Volume 17, Issue 2 p. 193-207
RESEARCH ARTICLE

Silencing Palestine: Limitations on free speech within mental health organizations

Elizabeth Berger

Corresponding Author

Elizabeth Berger

Department of Psychiatry and Behavioral Sciences, George Washington University, Washington, D.C., USA

Correspondence

Elizabeth Berger, Department of Psychiatry and Behavioral Sciences, George Washington University, Washington, D.C. USA

Email: elizabethbergermd@gmail.com

Search for more papers by this author
Samah Jabr

Samah Jabr

Department of Psychiatry and Behavioral Sciences, George Washington University, Washington, D.C., USA

Mental Health Unit, Palestinian MoH, Ramallah, Palestine

Search for more papers by this author
First published: 09 September 2019
Citations: 5

Abstract

The authors report on episodes in which five professional mental health organizations—for the most part associations for psychoanalysis and psychoanalytically oriented psychotherapy—have covertly tried to silence members who bring attention to the issue of human rights abuses inflicted by the Israeli occupation of Palestine. These various vignettes illustrate how the leadership of these organizations systematically attempts to limit the activism of their members, even in their “free time,” and to forbid the introduction of discussion of Israel/Palestine into their newsletters, meetings, chatrooms, and other organizational venues—despite the fact that these organizations profess their commitment to exploring themes of social justice and to the principle of open dialogue. Implications and recommendations are discussed, particularly the practical need for transparency on the part of our organizations and the intellectual need for a more complete theoretical understanding of the roles of history, ideology, and collective meaning within mental life.

CONFLICT OF INTEREST

The authors report no conflict of interest.

The full text of this article hosted at iucr.org is unavailable due to technical difficulties.