Volume 30, Issue 4 p. 159-171
INVITED SPECIAL ISSUE ARTICLE

Childhood risk factors for criminal career duration: Comparisons with prevalence, onset, frequency and recidivism

David P. Farrington

Corresponding Author

David P. Farrington

Emeritus Professor of Psychological Criminology, Cambridge University, Institute of Criminology, Cambridge, UK

Correspondence

David P. Farrington, Emeritus Professor of Psychological Criminology, Cambridge University, Institute of Criminology, Sidgwick Avenue, Cambridge, CB3 9DA, UK.

Email: dpf1@cam.ac.uk

Search for more papers by this author
First published: 22 June 2020
Citations: 34

Abstract

It has been argued that the predictors of all criminal career features are the same, and that childhood risk factors do not predict life-course-persistent offenders. Little is known about childhood predictors of the duration of criminal careers. The aim is to investigate childhood (aged 8–10 years) risk factors for criminal career duration, in comparison with childhood risk factors for other criminal career features. The Cambridge Study in Delinquent Development is a prospective longitudinal survey of 411 South London males from age 8, with conviction records up to age 61. Life-course-persistent (LCP) offenders were defined as those with a criminal career lasting at least 20 years. The strongest predictors of LCP offenders were harsh discipline, poor parental supervision, a convicted father and parental conflict. Childhood risk factors for LCP offenders and criminal career duration were different from childhood risk factors for the prevalence of offending (convicted versus unconvicted males). These results should be taken into account in developmental and life-course criminology theories, risk assessment instruments and risk-focused interventions.

CONFLICT OF INTEREST

The authors declare no potential conflict of interest.

DATA AVAILABILITY STATEMENT

The childhood risk factor data are openly available from the U.S. National Archive of Criminal Justice Data in Michigan. The criminal record data cannot be shared because of ethical, privacy and data protection issues.

The full text of this article hosted at iucr.org is unavailable due to technical difficulties.