Environmental disclosure and stakeholder engagement via social media: State of the art and potential in public utilities
Corresponding Author
Davide Giacomini PhD
Department of Economics and Management, University of Brescia, Brescia, Italy
Correspondence
Davide Giacomini, Department of Economics and Management, University of Brescia, Contrada S. Chiara 50, 25122 Brescia, Italy.
Email: davide.giacomini@unibs.it
Search for more papers by this authorPaola Zola PhD
Institute of Informatic and Telematics, National Research Council, Pisa, Italy
Search for more papers by this authorDiego Paredi
Department of Economics and Management, University of Brescia, Brescia, Italy
Search for more papers by this authorMario Mazzoleni
Department of Economics and Management, University of Brescia, Brescia, Italy
Search for more papers by this authorCorresponding Author
Davide Giacomini PhD
Department of Economics and Management, University of Brescia, Brescia, Italy
Correspondence
Davide Giacomini, Department of Economics and Management, University of Brescia, Contrada S. Chiara 50, 25122 Brescia, Italy.
Email: davide.giacomini@unibs.it
Search for more papers by this authorPaola Zola PhD
Institute of Informatic and Telematics, National Research Council, Pisa, Italy
Search for more papers by this authorDiego Paredi
Department of Economics and Management, University of Brescia, Brescia, Italy
Search for more papers by this authorMario Mazzoleni
Department of Economics and Management, University of Brescia, Brescia, Italy
Search for more papers by this authorFunding information: Acque Bresciane S.r.l.
Abstract
The concept of sustainable development has become dominant in the current socio-economic debate at the global level. In particular, environmental issues have become increasingly central in the action of all organisations: private, public, and hybrid. Analysing a sample of Italian public utilities, we studied the level of disclosure regarding environmental topics via public Facebook pages. The aim of this study is to evaluate the impact of Web 2.0 on municipally owned public utilities' voluntary disclosure of environmental issues and stakeholder interest in this field. The findings show that the use of Facebook by public utilities to disclose environmental issues is still at an early stage. However, it is constantly growing, especially in the larger companies and in those with mixed public/private ownership.
REFERENCES
- Adams, C., & Frost, G. (2006). The internet and change in corporate stakeholder engagement and communication strategies on social and environmental performance. Journal of Accounting & Organisational Change, 2(3), 281–303.
10.1108/18325910610690090 Google Scholar
- Agenzia per l'Italia digitale. (2018). Relazione Commissione Digitale/Digital Commission Report. Rome.
- Agostino, D., & Arnaboldi, M. (2015). A measurement framework for assessing the contribution of social media to public engagement: An empirical analysis on FB. Public Management Review, 18(9), 1289–1307.
- Ali, W., Frynas, J., & Mahmood, Z. (2017). Determinants of corporate social responsibility (CSR) disclosure in developed and developing countries: A literature review. Corporate Social Responsibility and Environmental Management, 24(4), 273–294.
- Argento, D., Grossi, G., Persson, K., & Vingren, T. (2019). Sustainability disclosures of hybrid organisations: Swedish state-owned enterprises. Meditari Accountancy Research, 27(4), 505–533.
- Ball, A., & Bebbington, J. (2008). Editorial: Accounting and reporting for sustainable development in public service organisations. Public Money & Management, 28(6), 323–326.
- Bebbington, J., Brown, J., & Frame, B. (2007). Accounting technologies and sustainability assessment models. Ecological Economics, 61(2–3), 224–236.
- Bedard, S., & Tolmie, C. (2018). Millennials' green consumption behaviour: Exploring the role of social media. Corporate Social Responsibility And Environmental Management, 25(6), 1388–1396.
- Bel, G., & Fageda, X. (2006). Between privatisation and intermunicipal cooperation: Small municipalities, scale economies and transaction costs. Urban Public Economics Review, 6, 13–31.
- Bellucci, M., & Manetti, G. (2017). FB as a tool for supporting dialogic accounting? Evidence from large philanthropic foundations in the United States. Accounting, Auditing & Accountability Journal, 30(4), 874–905.
- Bird, S. & Loper, E. (2004). NLTK: The natural language toolkit. In Proceedings of the ACL 2004 on Interactive Poster and Demonstration Sessions (p. 31). Morristown, N.J.: Association for Computing Linguistics.
10.3115/1219044.1219075 Google Scholar
- Bollegala, D., Weir, D., & Carroll, J. (2011). Using multiple sources to construct a sentiment sensitive thesaurus for cross-domain sentiment classification. In Proceedings of the 49th Annual Meeting of the Association for Computational Linguistics: Human Language Technologies (pp. 132–141). Association for Computational Linguistics.
- Bonsón, E., Royo, S., & Ratkai, M. (2017). FB practices in western European municipalities. Administration & Society, 49(3), 320–347.
- Branco, M., & Rodrigues, L. (2008). Factors influencing social responsibility disclosure by Portuguese companies. Journal Of Business Ethics, 83(4), 685–701. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10551-007-9658-z
- Brown, J. (2008). Democracy, sustainability and dialogic accounting technologies: Taking pluralism seriously. Critical Perspectives on Accounting, 20(3), 313–342.
10.1016/j.cpa.2008.08.002 Google Scholar
- Brown, N., & Deegan, C. (1998). The public disclosure of environmental performance information—A dual test of media agenda setting theory and legitimacy theory. Accounting And Business Research, 29(1), 21–41. https://doi.org/10.1080/00014788.1998.9729564
10.1080/00014788.1998.9729564 Google Scholar
- Bruton, G., Peng, M., Ahlstrom, D., Stan, C., & Xu, K. (2015). State-owned enterprises around the WORLD as hybrid organisations. Academy of Management Perspectives, 29(1), 92–114.
- Carini, C., Giacomini, D., & Teodori, C. (2018). Accounting reform in Italy and perceptions on the local government consolidated report. International Journal of Public Administration, 42(3), 195–204.
- Castelló, I., Etter, M., & Årup Nielsen, F. (2016). Strategies of legitimacy through social media: The networked strategy. Journal of Management Studies, 53(3), 402–432.
- Ceron, A., Curini, L., Iacus, S., & Porro, G. (2014). Every tweet counts? How sentiment analysis of social media can improve our knowledge of citizens' political preferences with an application to Italy and France. New Media & Society, 16(2), 340–358.
- Colleoni, E. (2013). CSR communication strategies for organisational legitimacy in social media. Corporate Communications: An International Journal, 18(2), 228–248.
10.1108/13563281311319508 Google Scholar
- Cormier, D., & Gordon, I. (2001). An examination of social and environmental reporting strategies. Accounting, Auditing & Accountability Journal, 14(5), 587–617.
10.1108/EUM0000000006264 Google Scholar
- Cormier, D., Magnan, M., & Van Velthoven, B. (2005). Environmental disclosure quality in large German companies: Economic incentives, public pressures or institutional conditions? European Accounting Review, 14(1), 3–39.
10.1080/0963818042000339617 Google Scholar
- Cosenza, V. (2019). World map of social networks. Retrieved January 2, 2019, from http://vincos.it/world-map-of-social-networks/
- Deegan, C. (2002). Introduction: The legitimising effect of social and environmental disclosures – a theoretical foundation. Accounting, Auditing & Accountability Journal, 15(3), 282–311. https://doi.org/10.1108/09513570210435852
10.1108/09513570210435852 Google Scholar
- Deegan, C., Rankin, M., & Tobin, J. (2002). An examination of the corporate social and environmental disclosures of BHP from 1983–1997. Accounting, Auditing & Accountability Journal, 15(3), 312–343.
10.1108/09513570210435861 Google Scholar
- Dowling, J., & Pfeffer, J. (1975). Organisational legitimacy: Social values and organisational behavior. The Pacific Sociological Review, 18(1), 122–136.
- Elkington, J. (1999). Cannibals with forks. Oxford, U.K.: Capstone.
- Estévez-Ortiz, F., García-Jiménez, A., & Glösekötter, P. (2016). An application of people's sentiment from social media to smart cities. El Profesional De La Información, 25(6), 851.
10.3145/epi.2016.nov.02 Google Scholar
- Etter, M., Colleoni, E., Illia, L., Meggiorin, K., & D'Eugenio, A. (2018). Measuring organisational legitimacy in social media: Assessing citizens’ judgments with sentiment analysis. Business & Society, 57(1), 60–97.
- Filbeck, G., & Gorman, R. (2004). The relationship between the environmental and financial performance of public utilities. Environmental & Resource Economics, 29(2), 137–157.
- Freeman, R. (1984). Stakeholder management: Framework and philosophy. Boston: Mansfield: Pitman.
- Freeman, R., Harrison, J., Wicks, A., Parmar, B., & Colle, S. (2010). Stakeholder theory: The state of the art. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
10.1017/CBO9780511815768 Google Scholar
- Gallo, P., & Christensen, L. (2011). Firm size matters: An empirical investigation of organisational size and ownership on sustainability-related behaviors. Business & Society, 50(2), 315–349.
- Garde Sánchez, R., Rodríguez Bolívar, M., & López Hernández, A. (2017). Corporate and managerial characteristics as drivers of social responsibility disclosure by state-owned enterprises. Review of Managerial Science, 11(3), 633–659.
- Garde-Sanchez, R., López-Pérez, M., & López-Hernández, A. (2018). Current trends in research on social responsibility in state-owned enterprises: A review of the literature from 2000 to 2017. Sustainability, 10(7), 2403.
- Gehan, E. (1965). A generalized Wilcoxon test for comparing arbitrarily singly-censored samples. Biometrika, 52(1–2), 203–224.
- Gesuele, B. (2016). Municipalities and FB use: Which key drivers? Empirical evidence from Italian municipalities. International Journal of Public Administration, 39(10), 771–777.
- Ghosh, M., & Kar, A. (2013). Unsupervised linguistic approach for sentiment classification from online reviews using SentiWordNet 3.0. International Journal of Engineering Research & Technology, 2(9), 55–60.
- Giacomini, D. (2016). Accountability in Italian local governments: State of the art and future perspective. In B. Cuadrado-Ballesteros & I. G. Sánchez (Eds.), Local governments in the digital era: Looking for accountability ( 1st ed., pp. 17–32). New York: Nova Publishers.
- Giacomini, D. (2019). Debate: Should there be rules governing social media use for accountability in the public sector? Public Money & Management, 1–2. https://doi.org/10.1080/09540962.2019.1687826
- Giacomini, D., Rocca, L., Carini, C., & Mazzoleni, M. (2018). Overcoming the barriers to the diffusion of sustainability reporting in Italian LGOs: Better stick or carrot? Sustainability, 10(2), 131.
- Goswami, K., & Lodhia, S. (2014). Sustainability disclosure patterns of south Australian local councils: A case study. Public Money & Management, 34(4), 273–280.
- Gray, R. (1997), The silent practice of social and environmental accounting and corporate social reporting in companies”, in S. Zadek R. Evans, P.P. Pruzan (Eds), Building corporate accountability: emerging practices in social and ethical accounting auditing and reporting, pp. 201–217. London: Earthscan.
- Gray, R. (2010). Is accounting for sustainability actually accounting for sustainability. and How would we know? An exploration of narratives of organizations and the planet. Accounting, Organizations and Society, 35(1), 47–62.
- Gray, R., Kouhy, R., & Lavers, S. (1995). Corporate social and environmental reporting. Accounting, Auditing & Accountability Journal, 8(2), 47–77.
- Greiling, D., & Grüb, B. (2014). Sustainability reporting in Austrian and German local public enterprises. Journal of Economic Policy Reform, 17(3), 209–223.
- Greiling, D., Traxler, A., & Stötzer, S. (2015). Sustainability reporting in the Austrian, German and Swiss public sector. International Journal of Public Sector Management, 28(4/5), 404–428.
- Grossi, G., Papenfuß, U., & Tremblay, M. (2015). Corporate governance and accountability of state-owned enterprises. International Journal of Public Sector Management, 28(4/5), 274–285.
- Grossi, G., Reichard, C., Thomasson, A., & Vakkuri, J. (2017). Theme: Performance measurement of hybrid organisations: Emerging issues and future research perspectives. Public Money & Management, 37(6), 379–386.
- Guthrie, J., & Farneti, F. (2008). GRI sustainability reporting by Australian public sector organisations. Public Money & Management, 28(6), 361–366.
- Heale, R., & Twycross, A. (2015). Validity and reliability in quantitative studies. Evidence Based Nursing, 18(3), 66–67.
- Hoffmann, C., & Lutz, C. (2014). The impact of online media on stakeholder engagement and the governance of corporations. Journal of Public Affairs, 15(2), 163–174.
- Hörisch, J., Freeman, R., & Schaltegger, S. (2014). Applying stakeholder theory in sustainability management. Organisation & Environment, 27(4), 328–346.
- Huafang, X., & Jianguo, Y. (2007). Ownership structure, board composition and corporate voluntary disclosure. Managerial Auditing Journal, 22(6), 604–619.
10.1108/02686900710759406 Google Scholar
- Huang, X., & Watson, L. (2015). Corporate social responsibility research in accounting. Journal of Accounting Literature, 34, 1–16.
- Inchausti, B. (1997). The influence of company characteristics and accounting regulation on information disclosed by Spanish firms. European Accounting Review, 6(1), 45–68.
10.1080/096381897336863 Google Scholar
- Jurietti, E., Mandelli, A., & Fudurić, M. (2017). How do virtual corporate social responsibility dialogs generate value? A case study of the Unilever Sustainable Living Lab. Corporate Social Responsibility and Environmental Management, 24(5), 357–367. https://doi.org/10.1002/csr.1407
- Kaplan, A., & Haenlein, M. (2010). Users of the world, unite! The challenges and opportunities of social media. Business Horizons, 53(1), 59–68.
- Konrad, K., Truffer, B., & Voß, J. (2008). Multi-regime dynamics in the analysis of sectoral transformation potentials: Evidence from German utility sectors. Journal of Cleaner Production, 16(11), 1190–1202.
- Lee, L., Hutton, A., & SHU, S. (2015). The role of social media in the capital market: Evidence from consumer product recalls. Journal of Accounting Research, 53(2), 367–404.
- Li, Q., Luo, W., Wang, Y., & Wu, L. (2013). Firm performance, corporate ownership, and corporate social responsibility disclosure in China. Business Ethics: A European Review, 22(2), 159–173.
- Liu, B. (2012). Sentiment analysis and opinion mining. San Rafael, Calif: Morgan & Claypool.
10.1007/978-3-031-02145-9 Google Scholar
- Lodhia, S., & Stone, G. (2017). Integrated reporting in an internet and social media communication environment: Conceptual insights. Australian Accounting Review, 27(1), 17–33.
- Lozano, R. (2019). Analysing the use of tools, initiatives, and approaches to promote sustainability in corporations. Corporate Social Responsibility and Environmental Management. https://doi.org/10.1002/csr.1860
- Manetti, G., & Bellucci, M. (2016). The use of social media for engaging stakeholders in sustainability reporting. Accounting, Auditing & Accountability Journal, 29(6), 985–1011.
- Martin, S., Greiling, D., & Wetzelhütter, D. (2018). Expectations of FB users towards a virtual dialogue with their public utility. International Journal of Energy Sector Management, 12(3), 408–425.
- McKnight, P., & Najab, J. (2010). Kruskal–Wallis Test. In The Corsini encyclopedia of psychology, London: John Wiley & Sons, 1(1).
10.1002/9780470479216.corpsy0491 Google Scholar
- Mia, P., Hazelton, J., & Guthrie, J. (2018). Measuring for climate actions: A disclosure study of ten megacities. Meditari Accountancy Research, 26(4), 550–575.
- Michelon, G. (2011). Sustainability disclosure and reputation: A comparative study. Corporate Reputation Review, 14(2), 79–96.
10.1057/crr.2011.10 Google Scholar
- Miller, G., & Skinner, D. (2015). The evolving disclosure landscape: How changes in technology, the media, and capital markets are affecting disclosure. Journal of Accounting Research, 53(2), 221–239.
- Ministero Economia e Finanze. (2017). Open data partecipazioni PA. Retrieved September 22, 2019, from http://www.dt.tesoro.it/it/attivita_istituzionali/partecipazioni_pubbliche/censimento_parteciazioni_pubbliche/open_data_partecipazioni/dati_partecipazioni_2015.html
- Mohammad, S. & Turney, P. (2010). Emotions evoked by common words and phrases: Using Mechanical Turk to create an emotion lexicon. In Proceedings of the NAACL HLT 2010 Workshop on Computational Approaches to Analysis and Generation of Emotion in Text (pp. 26–34). Association for Computational Linguistics.
- Oliveira, N., Cortez, P., & Areal, N. (2016). Stock market sentiment lexicon acquisition using microblogging data and statistical measures. Decision Support Systems, 85, 62–73.
- Rahman, N. H. W. A., Mohamed Zain, M., & Hanim Yaakop Yahaya Al-Haj, N. (2011). CSR disclosures and its determinants: Evidence from Malaysian government link companies. Social Responsibility Journal, 7(2), 181–201.
10.1108/17471111111141486 Google Scholar
- Rodríguez-Bolívar, M., Garde-Sánchez, R., & Lopez-Hernández, A. M. (2015). Managers as drivers of CSR in state-owned enterprises. Journal of Environmental Planning and Management, 58(5), 771–801.
- Russell, S., Milne, M., & Dey, C. (2017). Accounts of nature and the nature of accounts. Accounting, Auditing & Accountability Journal, 30(7), 1426–1458.
- Sancino, A., Sicilia, M., & Grossi, G. (2017). Between patronage and good governance: Organizational arrangements in (local) public appointment processes. International Review Of Administrative Sciences, 84(4), 785–802. https://doi.org/10.1177/0020852316675944
- Scarpa, C., & Pellizzola, L. (2009). Comuni SpA: Il capitalismo municipale in Italia. Bologna: Il Mulino.
- Schumaker, R., Jarmoszko, A., & Labedz, C. (2016). Predicting wins and spread in the Premier League using a sentiment analysis of twitter. Decision Support Systems, 88, 76–84.
- Smith, K., Blazovich, J., & Smith, L. (2015). Social media adoption by corporations: An examination by platform, industry, size, and financial performance. Academy of Marketing Studies Journal, 19(2), 127–143.
- Soliman, M. (2013). Firm characteristics and the extent of voluntary disclosure: The case of Egypt. Research Journal of Finance and Accounting, 4(17), 71–80 https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.2311005
- Song, B., & Wen, J. (2019). Online corporate social responsibility communication strategies and stakeholder engagements: A comparison of controversial versus noncontroversial industries. Corporate Social Responsibility and Environmental Management.
- Stubbs, W., Higgins, C., & Milne, M. (2013). Why do companies not produce sustainability reports? Business Strategy and the Environment, 22(7), 456–470. https://doi.org/10.1002/bse.1756
- Tagesson, T., Blank, V., Broberg, P., & Collin, S. O. (2009). What explains the extent and content of social and environmental disclosures on corporate websites: A study of social and environmental sustainability disclosures of hybrid organizations reporting in Swedish listed corporations. Corporate Social Responsibility and Environmental Management, 16(6), 352–364.
- Tagesson, T., Klugman, M., & Ekström, M. (2011). What explains the extent and content of social disclosures in Swedish municipalities' annual reports. Journal of Management & Governance, 17(2), 217–235.
10.1007/s10997-011-9174-5 Google Scholar
- Thomson, I., & Bebbington, J. (2005). Social and environmental reporting in the UK: A pedagogic evaluation. Critical Perspectives on Accounting, 16(5), 507–533.
10.1016/j.cpa.2003.06.003 Google Scholar
- Top Utility Analysis. (2018). Le performance delle utility italiane. Milano. Retrieved from http://www.toputility.it/wp-content/uploads/2018/01/Sintesi-dei-risultati-Top-Utility-VIEDstamp.pdf
- Voorn, B., van Genugten, M., & van Thiel, S. (2017). The efficiency and effectiveness of municipally owned corporations: A systematic review. Local Government Studies, 43(5), 820–841.
- Waters, R., & Jamal, J. (2011). Tweet, tweet, tweet: A content analysis of nonprofit organisations' Twitter updates. Public Relations Review, 37(3), 321–324.
- Williams, B., Wilmshurst, T., & Clift, R. (2011). Sustainability reporting by local government in Australia: Current and future prospects. Accounting Forum, 35(3), 176–186.
10.1016/j.accfor.2011.06.004 Google Scholar
- Yakhou, M., & Dorweiler, V. (2004). Environmental accounting: An essential component of business strategy. Business Strategy and the Environment, 13(2), 65–77.
10.1002/bse.395 Google Scholar
- Zheng, H., & Zhang, Y. (2016). Do SOEs outperform private enterprises in CSR? Evidence from China. Chinese Management Studies, 10(3), 435–457.
- Zola, P., Cortez, P., Ragno, C., & Brentari, E. (2019). Social media cross-source and cross domain sentiment classification. International Journal of Information Technology & Decision Making, 18(05), 1469–1499.
- Zola, P., Rocca, L., Giacomini, D., & Paredi, D. (2019). The “Sentability”: Sentiment analysis for social media's accountability. The case of environmental issues in Italian municipalities. In Book of Abstracts (p. 129). Milan, Italy: Data Science & Social Research 2019.