How significant is corporate social responsibility to business research?
Corresponding Author
Roberto Fernández-Gago
Facultad de Ciencias Económicas y Empresariales, Universidad de León, León, Spain
Correspondence
Roberto Fernández-Gago, Facultad de Ciencias Económicas y Empresariales, Universidad de León, León, Spain.
Email: roberto.fernandez@unileon.es
Search for more papers by this authorLaura Cabeza-García
Facultad de Ciencias Económicas y Empresariales, Universidad de León, León, Spain
Search for more papers by this authorJosé-Luis Godos-Díez
Facultad de Ciencias Económicas y Empresariales, Universidad de León, León, Spain
Search for more papers by this authorCorresponding Author
Roberto Fernández-Gago
Facultad de Ciencias Económicas y Empresariales, Universidad de León, León, Spain
Correspondence
Roberto Fernández-Gago, Facultad de Ciencias Económicas y Empresariales, Universidad de León, León, Spain.
Email: roberto.fernandez@unileon.es
Search for more papers by this authorLaura Cabeza-García
Facultad de Ciencias Económicas y Empresariales, Universidad de León, León, Spain
Search for more papers by this authorJosé-Luis Godos-Díez
Facultad de Ciencias Económicas y Empresariales, Universidad de León, León, Spain
Search for more papers by this authorAbstract
Previous studies have established that there is a positive evolution of the quantity of corporate social responsibility (CSR) research output in terms of published papers. So far, however, there has been little discussion about how influential it has become within the business discipline. This article seeks to obtain data which will help to address this research gap. The databases Web of Science and Journal Citation Reports (JCR) were used to carry out analyses at the journal and article levels. Results confirmed a solid growth in CSR research and revealed that papers on the topic have gained attention from the scientific community. Furthermore, CSR articles are mostly concentrated in a small number of specialized journals, and opting for these journals may be related to the total citations. The conclusions drawn from this study may be especially useful for academic managers and business researchers interested in the evaluation of academic performance.
REFERENCES
- Aguinis, H., & Glavas, A. (2012). What we know and don't know about corporate social responsibility: A review and research agenda. Journal of Management, 38(4), 932–968. https://doi.org/10.1177/0149206311436079
- Al-Abdin, A., Roy, T., & Nicholson, J. D. (2018). Researching corporate social responsibility in the Middle East: The current state and future directions. Corporate Social Responsibility and Environmental Management, 25(1), 47–65. https://doi.org/10.1002/csr.1439
- Alvarado-Herrera, A., Bigné-Alcañiz, E., Currás-Pérez, R., & Sánchez-García, I. (2011). Epistemological evolution of corporate social responsibility in management: An empirical analysis of 35 years of research. African Journal of Business Management, 5(6), 2055–2064 Retrieved from http://www.academicjournals.org/ajbm/pdf/pdf2011/18Mar/Herrera et al.pdf
- Amos, G. J. (2018). Researching corporate social responsibility in developing-countries context: A systematic review of the literature. International Journal of Law and Management, 60, 284–310. https://doi.org/10.1108/IJLMA-04-2017-0093
- Arellano, M., & Bond, S. (1991). Some tests of specification for panel data: Monte Carlo evidence and an application to employment equations. The Review of Economic Studies, 58(2), 277–297. https://doi.org/10.2307/2297968
- Baum, J. A. C. (2011). Free-riding on power laws: Questioning the validity of the impact factor as a measure of research quality in organization studies. Organization, 18(4), 449–466. https://doi.org/10.1177/1350508411403531
- Beets, S. D., Lewis, B. R., & Brower, H. H. (2016). The quality of business ethics journals: An assessment based on application. Business & Society, 55(2), 188–213. https://doi.org/10.1177/0007650313478974
- Bowen, H. R. (1953). Social responsibilities of the businessman. New York, NY: Harper & Row.
- Callan, S. J., & Thomas, J. M. (2011). Executive compensation, corporate social responsibility, and corporate financial performance: A multi-equation framework. Corporate Social Responsibility and Environmental Management, 18(6), 332–351. https://doi.org/10.1002/csr.249
- Carroll, A. B. (1991). The pyramid of corporate social responsibility: Toward the moral management of organizational stakeholders. Business Horizons, 34(4), 39–48. https://doi.org/10.1016/0007-6813(91)90005-G
10.1016/0007-6813(91)90005-G Google Scholar
- Chan, K. C., Fung, A., Fung, H.-G., & Yau, J. (2016). A citation analysis of business ethics research: A global perspective. Journal of Business Ethics, 136(3), 557–573. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10551-014-2533-9
- Chan, K. C., Fung, H.-G., & Yau, J. (2010). Business ethics research: A global perspective. Journal of Business Ethics, 95(1), 39–53. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10551-009-0346-z
- Chan, K. C., Fung, H.-G., & Yau, J. (2013). Predominant sources and contributors of influential business ethics research: Evidence and implications from a threshold citation analysis. Business Ethics: A European Review, 22(3), 263–276. https://doi.org/10.1111/beer.12024
- Clarivate Analytics. (n.d.). Scope notes. Science Citation Index. Retrieved from http://mjl.clarivate.com/scope/scope_ssci/
- Cronin, B. (2001). Bibliometrics and beyond: Some thoughts on web-based citation analysis. Journal of Information Science, 27(1), 1–7. https://doi.org/10.1177/016555150102700101
- Dahlsrud, A. (2008). How corporate social responsibility is defined: An analysis of 37 definitions. Corporate Social Responsibility and Environmental Management, 15(1), 1–13. https://doi.org/10.1002/csr.132
- De Bakker, F. G. A., Groenewegen, P., & Den Hond, F. (2005). A bibliometric analysis of 30 years of research and theory on corporate social responsibility and corporate social performance. Business & Society, 44(3), 283–317. https://doi.org/10.1177/0007650305278086
10.1177/0007650305278086 Google Scholar
- De Bakker, F. G. A., Groenewegen, P., & Den Hond, F. (2006). A research note on the use of bibliometrics to review the corporate social responsibility and corporate social performance literature. Business & Society, 45(1), 7–19. https://doi.org/10.1177/0007650305283092
10.1177/0007650305283092 Google Scholar
- Egri, C. P., & Ralston, D. A. (2008). Corporate responsibility: A review of international management research from 1998 to 2007. Journal of International Management, 14(4), 319–339. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.intman.2007.09.003
- European Commission. (2011). A renewed EU strategy 2011–14 for corporate social responsibility. Communication from the commission to the European Parliament, the council, the European economic and social committee and the Committee of the Regions, October 25, 2011, COM(2011) 681 final. Brussels: European Commission.
- Ferramosca, S., & Verona, R. (2019). Framing the evolution of corporate social responsibility as a discipline (1973–2018): A large-scale scientometric analysis. Corporate Social Responsibility and Environmental Management, 27, 1–26. https://doi.org/10.1002/csr.1792
- Frynas, J. G., & Yamahaki, C. (2016). Corporate social responsibility: Review and roadmap of theoretical perspectives. Business Ethics: A European Review, 25(3), 258–285. https://doi.org/10.1111/beer.12115
- Gilbert, G. N. (1977). Referencing as persuasion. Social Studies of Science, 7(1), 113–122. https://doi.org/10.1177/030631277700700105
- Grewatsch, S., & Kleindienst, I. (2017). When does it pay to be good? Moderators and mediators in the corporate sustainability—Corporate financial performance relationship: A critical review. Journal of Business Ethics, 145(2), 383–416. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10551-015-2852-5
- Huang, D. (2016). Positive correlation between quality and quantity in academic journals. Journal of Informetrics, 10(2), 329–335. https://doi.org/10.1016/J.JOI.2016.02.002
- Jouber, H. (2019). How does CEO pay slice influence corporate social responsibility? U.S.-Canadian versus Spanish-French listed firms. Corporate Social Responsibility and Environmental Management, 26(2), 502–517. https://doi.org/10.1002/csr.1728
- King, J. (1987). A review of bibliometric and other science indicators and their role in research evaluation. Journal of Information Science, 13(5), 261–276. https://doi.org/10.1177/016555158701300501
- Köseoglu, M. A., Yildiz, M., & Ciftci, T. (2018). Authorship trends and collaboration patterns in business ethics literature. Business Ethics: A European Review, 27(2), 164–177. https://doi.org/10.1111/beer.12177
- Lindsey, D. (1989). Using citation counts as a measure of quality in science measuring what's measurable rather than what's valid. Scientometrics, 15(3), 189–203. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02017198
- Lockett, A., Moon, J., & Visser, W. (2006). Corporate social responsibility in management research: Focus, nature, salience and sources of influence. Journal of Management Studies, 43(1), 115–136. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-6486.2006.00585.x
- Lu, L. Y. Y., & Liu, J. S. (2014). The knowledge diffusion paths of corporate social responsibility—From 1970 to 2011. Corporate Social Responsibility and Environmental Management, 21(2), 113–128. https://doi.org/10.1002/csr.1309
- Lulewicz-Sas, A. (2017). Corporate social responsibility in the light of management science—Bibliometric analysis. Procedia Engineering, 182, 412–417. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.proeng.2017.03.124
10.1016/j.proeng.2017.03.124 Google Scholar
- Ma, Z., Liang, D., Yu, K. H., & Lee, Y. (2012). Most cited business ethics publications: Mapping the intellectual structure of business ethics studies in 2001-2008. Business Ethics: A European Review, 21(3), 286–297. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-8608.2012.01652.x
- MacRoberts, M. H., & MacRoberts, B. R. (1996). Problems of citation analysis. Scientometrics, 36(3), 435–444. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02129604
- Meyer, M., Waldkirch, R. W., Duscher, I., & Just, A. (2018). Drivers of citations: An analysis of publications in “top” accounting journals. Critical Perspectives on Accounting, 51, 24–46. https://doi.org/10.1016/J.CPA.2017.07.001
- Moed, H. F., & Garfield, E. (2004). In basic science the percentage of “authoritative” references decreases as bibliographies become shorter. Scientometrics, 60(3), 295–303. https://doi.org/10.1023/B:SCIE.0000034375.39385.84
- Peng, C. (2019). The role of business strategy and CEO compensation structure in driving corporate social responsibility: Linkage towards a sustainable development perspective. Corporate Social Responsibility and Environmental Management, 1–12. https://doi.org/10.1002/csr.1863
- Perea, E., & Brady, M. (2017). Research rigor and the gap between academic journals and business practitioners. Journal of Management Development, 36(8), 1052–1062. https://doi.org/10.1108/JMD-12-2016-0332
- Phelan, T. J. (1999). A compendium of issues for citation analysis. Scientometrics, 45(1), 117–136. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02458472
- Piepenbrink, A., & Nurmammadov, E. (2015). Topics in the literature of transition economies and emerging markets. Scientometrics, 102(3), 2107–2130. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11192-014-1513-2
- Robertson, C. J. (2008). An analysis of 10 years of business ethics research in strategic management journal: 1996-2005. Journal of Business Ethics, 80(4), 745–753. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10551-007-9466-5
- Robertson, C. J., Blevins, D. P., & Duffy, T. (2013). A five-year review, update, and assessment of ethics and governance in strategic management journal. Journal of Business Ethics, 117(1), 85–91. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10551-012-1511-3
- Serenko, A., & Bontis, N. (2009). A citation-based ranking of the business ethics scholarly journals. International Journal of Business Governance and Ethics, 4(4), 390–399.
10.1504/IJBGE.2009.023790 Google Scholar
- Smith, S. D. (2004). Is an article in a top journal a top article? Financial Management, 33(4), 133–149 Retrieved from http://www.jstor.org/stable/3666331
- Solomon, D. J. (2007). The role of peer review for scholarly journals in the information age. The Journal of Electronic Publishing, 10(1). https://doi.org/10.3998/3336451.0010.107
10.3998/3336451.0010.107 Google Scholar
- Stewart, J. A. (1983). Achievement and ascriptive processes in the recognition of scientific articles. Social Forces, 62(1), 166–189. https://doi.org/10.2307/2578354
- Stremersch, S., Verniers, I., & Verhoef, P. C. (2007). The quest for citations: Drivers of article impact. Journal of Marketing, 71(3), 171–193. https://doi.org/10.1509/jmkg.71.3.171
- Taneja, S. S., Taneja, P. K., & Gupta, R. K. (2011). Researches in corporate social responsibility: A review of shifting focus, paradigms, and methodologies. Journal of Business Ethics, 101(3), 343–364. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10551-010-0732-6
- Thyer, B. A. (2008). Preparing research articles. New York, NY: Oxford University Press.
10.1093/acprof:oso/9780195323375.001.0001 Google Scholar
- Vogel, R., Hattke, F., & Petersen, J. (2017). Journal rankings in management and business studies: What rules do we play by? Research Policy, 46(10), 1707–1722. https://doi.org/10.1016/J.RESPOL.2017.07.001
- Wang, H., Tong, L., Takeuchi, R., & George, G. (2016). Corporate social responsibility: An overview and new research directions. Academy of Management Journal, 59(2), 534–544. https://doi.org/10.5465/amj.2016.5001
- Wilhite, A. W., & Fong, E. A. (2012). Coercive citation in academic publishing. Science, 335(6068), 542–543. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.1212540
- Zhao, H., Zhang, F., & Kwon, J. (2018). Corporate social responsibility research in international business journals: An author co-citation analysis. International Business Review, 27(2), 389–400. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ibusrev.2017.09.006