How do the size and independence of the board of trustees affect the financial and sustainable performance of socially responsible mutual funds?
Corresponding Author
Fernando Muñoz
Departamento de Contabilidad y Finanzas, Universidad de Zaragoza, Zaragoza, Spain
Correspondence
Fernando Muñoz, Facultad de Economía y Empresa, Universidad de Zaragoza, C/Gran Vía 2, 50005 Zaragoza, Spain.
Email: fmunoz@unizar.es
Search for more papers by this authorCorresponding Author
Fernando Muñoz
Departamento de Contabilidad y Finanzas, Universidad de Zaragoza, Zaragoza, Spain
Correspondence
Fernando Muñoz, Facultad de Economía y Empresa, Universidad de Zaragoza, C/Gran Vía 2, 50005 Zaragoza, Spain.
Email: fmunoz@unizar.es
Search for more papers by this authorFunding information: Gobierno de Aragón, Grant/Award Number: S38_17R; Ministerio de Ciencia e Innovación, Grant/Award Number: RTI2018-093483-B-I00; Universidad de Zaragoza and Fundación Ibercaja, Grant/Award Number: JIUZ-2018-SOC-13 (268-249)
Abstract
In this article, I study for first time how the board of trustees’ size and independence influence the financial performance and sustainability scores of socially responsible (SR) mutual funds. The sample analyzed consists of 99 SR US domestic equity mutual funds existing in the period 2012–2018. The results obtained indicate that funds monitored by boards with a lower number of trustees and an independent chair show lower net expense ratios and better sustainability scores. In addition, smaller boards and a greater percentage of independent trustees are positively associated with the achievement of a better risk-adjusted financial performance. Regarding SR strategies, negative screens are more likely among funds with larger and less independent boards whereas positive screens are more frequent when boards show the opposite characteristics. Another finding indicates that SR funds that implement positive screens present more industry concentrated portfolios that lead to the achievement of a more sustainable performance.
REFERENCES
- Adams, J. C., Mansi, S. A., & Nishikawa, T. (2010). Internal governance mechanisms and operational performance: Evidence from index mutual funds. The Review of Financial Studies, 23(3), 1261–1286.
- Adams, J. C., Nishikawa, T., & Rao, R. P. (2018). Mutual fund performance, management teams, and boards. Journal of Banking & Finance, 92, 358–368.
- Ammann, M., Bauer, C., Fischer, S., & Müller, P. (2019). The impact of the Morningstar sustainability rating on mutual fund flows. European Financial Management, 25(3), 520–553.
- Bauer, R., Koedijk, K., & Otten, R. (2005). International evidence on ethical mutual fund performance and investment style. Journal of Banking & Finance, 29(7), 1751–1767.
- Benson, K. L., & Humphrey, J. E. (2008). Socially responsible investment funds: Investor reaction to current and past returns. Journal of Banking & Finance, 32(9), 1850–1859.
- Bhojraj, S., Jun Cho, Y., & Yehuda, N. (2012). Mutual fund family size and mutual fund performance: The role of regulatory changes. Journal of Accounting Research, 50(3), 647–684.
- Bollen, N. P. (2007). Mutual fund attributes and investor behavior. Journal of Financial and Quantitative Analysis, 42(3), 683–708.
- Bos, J. (2017). Sustainability scores for investment funds. CFA Institute Magazine, 28(1), 26–28.
10.2469/cfm.v28.n1.13 Google Scholar
- Carhart, M. M. (1997). On persistence in mutual fund performance. The Journal of Finance, 52(1), 57–82.
- Chen, J., Hong, H., Huang, M., & Kubik, J. D. (2004). Does fund size erode mutual fund performance? The role of liquidity and organization. American Economic Review, 94(5), 1276–1302.
- Chen, X., & Scholtens, B. (2018). The urge to act: A comparison of active and passive socially responsible investment funds in the United States. Corporate Social Responsibility and Environmental Management, 25(6), 1154–1173.
- Chevalier, J., & Ellison, G. (1999). Career concerns of mutual fund managers. The Quarterly Journal of Economics, 114(2), 389–432.
- Christoffersen, S. E., & Sarkissian, S. (2009). City size and fund performance. Journal of Financial Economics, 92(2), 252–275.
- Cortez, M. C., Silva, F., & Areal, N. (2009). The performance of European socially responsible funds. Journal of Business Ethics, 87(4), 573–588.
- Del Guercio, D., Dann, L. Y., & Partch, M. M. (2003). Governance and boards of directors in closed-end investment companies. Journal of Financial Economics, 69(1), 111–152.
- Durán-Santomil, P., Otero-González, L., Correia-Domingues, R. H., & Reboredo, J. C. (2019). Does sustainability score impact mutual fund performance? Sustainability, 11(10), 2972.
- Elton, E. J., Gruber, M. J., Das, S., & Hlavka, M. (1993). Efficiency with costly information: A reinterpretation of evidence from managed portfolios. The Review of Financial Studies, 6(1), 1–22.
- Erragragui, E., & Lagoarde-Segot, T. (2016). Solving the SRI puzzle? A note on the mainstreaming of ethical investment. Finance Research Letters, 18, 32–42.
- Evans, R. B. (2010). Mutual fund incubation. The Journal of Finance, 65(4), 1581–1611.
- Ferris, S. P., & Yan, X. S. (2007). Do independent directors and chairmen matter? The role of boards of directors in mutual fund governance. Journal of Corporate Finance, 13(2–3), 392–420.
- Ferruz, L., Munoz, F., & Vargas, M. (2012). Managerial abilities: Evidence from religious mutual fund managers. Journal of Business Ethics, 105(4), 503–517.
- Francoeur, C., Labelle, R., Balti, S., & Bouzaidi, S. E. (2019). To what extent do gender diverse boards enhance corporate social performance? Journal of Business Ethics, 155(2), 343–357.
- Freshfields Bruckhaus Deringer. (2005). A legal framework for the integration of environmental, social and governance issues into institutional investment. Geneva: United Nations Environment Programme Finance Initiative.
- Fricke, E. (2015). Board holdings, compensation and mutual fund manager turnover. Journal of Financial Services Research, 47(3), 295–312.
- Fu, R., & Wedge, L. (2011). Board independence and mutual fund manager turnover. Financial Review, 46(4), 621–641.
10.1111/j.1540-6288.2011.00314.x Google Scholar
- García Martín, C. J., & Herrero, B. (2019). Do board characteristics affect environmental performance? A study of EU firms. Corporate Social Responsibility and Environmental Management, 27(1), 74–94.
- Hong, H., & Kacperczyk, M. (2009). The price of sin: The effects of social norms on markets. Journal of Financial Economics, 93(1), 15–36.
- Hong, H., & Kostovetsky, L. (2012). Red and blue investing: Values and finance. Journal of Financial Economics, 103(1), 1–19.
- Hyun, E., Yang, D., Jung, H., & Hong, K. (2016). Women on boards and corporate social responsibility. Sustainability, 8(4), 300.
- Indro, D. C., Jiang, C. X., Hu, M. Y., & Lee, W. Y. (1999). Mutual fund performance: Does fund size matter? Financial Analysts Journal, 55(3), 74–87.
10.2469/faj.v55.n3.2274 Google Scholar
- Kacperczyk, M., Sialm, C., & Zheng, L. (2005). On the industry concentration of actively managed equity mutual funds. The Journal of Finance, 60(4), 1983–2011.
- Karagiannidis, I. (2010). Management team structure and mutual fund performance. Journal of International Financial Markets Institutions and Money, 20(2), 197–211.
- Kempf, A., & Osthoff, P. (2008). SRI funds: Nomen est omen. Journal of Business Finance & Accounting, 35(9–10), 1276–1294.
- Khorana, A. (2001). Performance changes following top management turnover: Evidence from open-end mutual funds. Journal of Financial and Quantitative Analysis, 36(3), 371–393.
- Khorana, A., Tufano, P., & Wedge, L. (2007). Board structure, mergers, and shareholder wealth: A study of the mutual fund industry. Journal of Financial Economics, 85(2), 571–598.
- Latzko, D. A. (1999). Economies of scale in mutual fund administration. Journal of Financial Research, 22(3), 331–339.
10.1111/j.1475-6803.1999.tb00731.x Google Scholar
- Manning, B., Braam, G., & Reimsbach, D. (2019). Corporate governance and sustainable business conduct—E ffects of board monitoring effectiveness and stakeholder engagement on corporate sustainability performance and disclosure choices. Corporate Social Responsibility and Environmental Management, 26(2), 351–366.
- Markowitz, H. (1952). Portfolio selection. The Journal of Finance, 7(1), 77–91.
- Martin, W. (2009). Socially responsible investing: Is your fiduciary duty at risk? Journal of Business Ethics, 90(4), 549–560.
- Moskowitz, T. J. (2000). Mutual fund performance: An empirical decomposition into stock-picking talent, style, transactions costs, and expenses: Discussion. The Journal of Finance, 55(4), 1695–1703.
- Muñoz, F. (2016). Cash flow timing skills of socially responsible mutual fund investors. International Review of Financial Analysis, 48, 110–124.
- Muñoz, F. (2019). The ‘smart money effect’ among socially responsible mutual fund investors. International Review of Economics and Finance, 62, 160–179.
- Muñoz, F., Vargas, M., & Marco, I. (2014). Environmental mutual funds: Financial performance and managerial abilities. Journal of Business Ethics, 124(4), 551–569.
- Namvar, E., & Phillips, B. (2013). Commonalities in investment strategy and the determinants of performance in mutual fund mergers. Journal of Banking & Finance, 37(2), 625–635.
- Nofsinger, J., & Varma, A. (2014). Socially responsible funds and market crises. Journal of Banking & Finance, 48, 180–193.
- Renneboog, L., Ter Horst, J., & Zhang, C. (2008). The price of ethics and stakeholder governance: The performance of socially responsible mutual funds. Journal of Corporate Finance, 14(3), 302–322.
- Renneboog, L., Ter Horst, J., & Zhang, C. (2011). Is ethical money financially smart? Nonfinancial attributes and money flows of socially responsible investment funds. Journal of Financial Intermediation, 20(4), 562–588.
- Richardson, B. J. (2011). From fiduciary duties to fiduciary relationships for socially responsible investing: Responding to the will of beneficiaries. Journal of Sustainable Finance and Investment, 1(1), 5–19.
10.3763/jsfi.2010.0002 Google Scholar
- Richardson, B. J. (2013). Fiduciary responsibility in retail funds: Clarifying the prospects for SRI. Journal of Sustainable Finance & Investment, 3(1), 1–16.
10.1080/20430795.2012.751349 Google Scholar
- Riedl, A., & Smeets, P. (2017). Why do investors hold socially responsible mutual funds? The Journal of Finance, 72(6), 2505–2550.
- Sandberg, J. (2011). Socially responsible investment and fiduciary duty: Putting the freshfields report into perspective. Journal of Business Ethics, 101(1), 143–162.
- Statman, M. (2004). Quiet conversations: The expressive nature of socially responsible investors. Journal of Financial Planning, 21, 40–46.
- Tufano, P., & Sevick, M. (1997). Board structure and fee-setting in the US mutual fund industry. Journal of Financial Economics, 46(3), 321–355.
- USSIF (2018). Report on US sustainable, responsible and impact investing trends. Retrieved from https://www.ussif.org/.
- Zubeltzu-Jaka, E., Álvarez-Etxeberria, I., & Ortas, E. (2020). The effect of the size of the board of directors on corporate social performance: A meta-analytic approach. Corporate Social Responsibility and Environmental Management, forthcoming. https://doi.org/10.1002/csr.1889