Volume 27, Issue 5 p. 2354-2367
RESEARCH ARTICLE

Minding the gap: Asymmetric effects of pay dispersion on stakeholder engagement in corporate environmental (Ir)responsibility

Ying Zhang

Corresponding Author

Ying Zhang

School of Management, Northwestern Polytechnical University, Xi'an, China

Correspondence

Ying Zhang, School of Management, Northwestern Polytechnical University, Xi'an, China.

Email: zhangyingmgt@nwpu.edu.cn

Search for more papers by this author
Li Tong

Li Tong

Department of Strategic Management & Organization, Singapore Management University, Singapore

Search for more papers by this author
Ji Li

Ji Li

Department of Human Resource Management, Dongbei University of Finance and Economics, Dalian, China

Search for more papers by this author
First published: 23 July 2020
Citations: 11

Funding information: Fundamental Research Funds for the Central Universities, Grant/Award Number: 3102019XJS03; National Natural Science Foundation of China, Grant/Award Number: 71932007; Natural Science Basic Research Plan in Shaanxi Province of China, Grant/Award Number: 2020JQ-227

Abstract

How does pay dispersion affect corporate environmental performance? Building on the tournament effect and equity perspective, we theorize that vertical pay dispersion and horizontal pay dispersion can impinge on corporate environmental performance. We develop the theoretical argument that vertical pay dispersion is negatively related to corporate environmental responsibility (CER) and positively related to corporate environmental irresponsibility (CEIR) due to the tournament competition among executives, and that horizontal pay dispersion is negatively related to CER and positively related to CEIR due to the unjust sense among executives. We then delve into the asymmetric effects of vertical pay dispersion and horizontal pay dispersion on CER and CEIR. We argue that the asymmetric effects result from the difference in social comparison. We find strong empirical support for our predictions. Implications for the development of the literature on pay dispersion and corporate environmental performance are discussed.

The full text of this article hosted at iucr.org is unavailable due to technical difficulties.