Volume 29, Issue 4 e2179
RESEARCH ARTICLE

The role of empathy in children's costly prosocial lie-telling behaviour

Pooja Megha Nagar

Corresponding Author

Pooja Megha Nagar

Department of Educational and Counselling Psychology, McGill University, Montreal, Quebec, Canada

Correspondence

Pooja Megha Nagar, Department of Educational and Counselling Psychology, McGill University, 3700 McTavish Street, Montreal, QC H3A 1Y2, Canada.

Email: megha.nagar@mail.mcgill.ca

Search for more papers by this author
Oksana Caivano

Oksana Caivano

Department of Educational and Counselling Psychology, McGill University, Montreal, Quebec, Canada

Search for more papers by this author
Victoria Talwar

Victoria Talwar

Department of Educational and Counselling Psychology, McGill University, Montreal, Quebec, Canada

Search for more papers by this author
First published: 10 March 2020
Citations: 17

Abstract

The aim of the present study was to examine the role of induced empathy and parent-reported empathy (i.e., affective and cognitive) as underlying motives for children's prosocial lie-telling tendencies. An experimental paradigm was used to elicit prosocial lies in children (N = 146, 7–11 years) in varying cost (low-cost/high-cost) and induction (empathy/neutral) conditions. Results indicate that induced empathy predicts prosocial lie likelihood and maintenance in low-cost conditions, and that cognitive empathy is a predictor of lie-likelihood. Post-hoc analyses revealed that a large portion of children chose to prosocially share with the distressed confederate, regardless of whether they lied for them. Individuals who shared were more likely to share in low-cost conditions, and also had higher cognitive empathy. Overall, this study provides unique insights into the role of empathy as an underlying cognitive process for children's prosocial decision-making.

Highlights

  • The role of empathy was examined in relation to children's prosocial lying and sharing behaviour in low- and high-cost conditions.
  • Parent-reported cognitive empathy predicted both lying and sharing in an experimental paradigm; induced empathy only predicted lying in low-cost conditions.
  • Overall, empathy proved to be an important underlying motive for children's prosocial decision-making.

DATA AVAILABILITY STATEMENT

The data that support the findings of this study are available from the corresponding author upon reasonable request.

The full text of this article hosted at iucr.org is unavailable due to technical difficulties.