Government Transfers and Time Allocation Decisions: The Case of Child Labour in Ethiopia
Corresponding Author
Ervin Prifti
Food and Agriculture Organization, Viale delle Terme di Caracalla, Rome, Italy
Correspondence to:
Ervin Prifti, Food and Agriculture Organization, Viale delle Terme di Caracalla, Rome, Italy.
E-mail: ervin.prifti@fao.org
Search for more papers by this authorSilvio Daidone
Food and Agriculture Organization, Viale delle Terme di Caracalla, Rome, Italy
Search for more papers by this authorGreta Campora
Food and Agriculture Organization, Viale delle Terme di Caracalla, Rome, Italy
Search for more papers by this authorNoemi Pace
Food and Agriculture Organization, Viale delle Terme di Caracalla, Rome, Italy
University of Teramo, Italy
Search for more papers by this authorCorresponding Author
Ervin Prifti
Food and Agriculture Organization, Viale delle Terme di Caracalla, Rome, Italy
Correspondence to:
Ervin Prifti, Food and Agriculture Organization, Viale delle Terme di Caracalla, Rome, Italy.
E-mail: ervin.prifti@fao.org
Search for more papers by this authorSilvio Daidone
Food and Agriculture Organization, Viale delle Terme di Caracalla, Rome, Italy
Search for more papers by this authorGreta Campora
Food and Agriculture Organization, Viale delle Terme di Caracalla, Rome, Italy
Search for more papers by this authorNoemi Pace
Food and Agriculture Organization, Viale delle Terme di Caracalla, Rome, Italy
University of Teramo, Italy
Search for more papers by this authorAbstract
We exploit the social cash transfer programme in Ethiopia to study how an increase in unearned income through a government transfer affects children's work time allocation and their school attendance rate. In rural areas, the transfer led to a half an hour reduction in the total number of hours worked, while in urban areas, transfers had the opposite impacts, worsening the child labour situation with no impacts on the share of children attending school. An insufficient transfer amount and lack of messaging on its recommended use may partly explain the mixed results on child labour and the lack of impacts on school attendance. © 2020 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.
REFERENCES
- Akresh R, de Walque D, Kazianga H. 2013. Cash transfers and child schooling: evidence from a randomized Evaluation of the role of conditionality. World Bank policy research working paper 6340.
- Asfaw, S., Pickmans, R., Alfani, F. & Davis, B. (2016). Productive Impact of Ethiopia’s Social Cash Transfer Pilot Programme. PtoP report. Rome: FAO.
- Attanasio O, Kugler A, Meghir C. 2008. Training disadvantaged youth in Latin America: evidence from a randomized trial, NBER working paper no. 13931.
- Attanasio O, Meghir C, Santiago A. 2012. Education choices in Mexico: using a structural model and a randomized experiment to evaluate PROGRESA. The Review of Economic Studies 79(1): 37–66.
- Baird S, McIntosh C, Özler B. 2011. Cash or condition? Evidence from a cash transfer experiment. The Quarterly Journal of Economics 126(4): 1709–1753.
- Bandara A, Dehejia R, Lavie-Rouse S. 2015. The impact of income and non-income shocks on child labor: evidence from a panel survey of Tanzania. World Development 67(C): 218–237.
- Barrientos A. 2014. Social assistance in developing countries. Southeast Asian Economies 31(1): 160.
10.1355/ae31-1m Google Scholar
- Barrientos A. 2016. From evidence to action: the story of cash transfers and impact evaluation in sub-Saharan Africa, edited by Benjamin Davis, Sudhanshu Handa, Nicola Hypher, Nicola winder, Paul C. winters, and Jennifer Yablonski. The Journal of Development Studies 52(12): 1831–1832.
- Bastagli F, Hagen Zanker J, Harman L, Barca V, Sturge G, Schmidt T. 2019. The impact of cash transfers: a review of the evidence from low- and middle-income countries. Journal of Social Policy 48(3): 569–594.
- Basu K, Das S, Dutta D. 2010. Child labor and household wealth: theory and empirical evidence of an inverted-U. Journal of Development Economics 91(1): 8–14.
- Beegle K, Dehejia RH, Gatti R. 2009. Why should we care about child labor? The education, labor market and health consequences of child labor. The Journal of Human Resources 44(4): 871–889.
- Behrman J, Davis B, Skoufias E. 1999. Final report: an evaluation of the selection of beneficiary households in the education, health, and nutrition program (PROGRESA) of Mexico; 1999. International Food Policy Research Institute: Washington, DC.
- Berhane G, Devereux S, Hoddinott J, Nega Tegebu F, Roelen K, Schwab B. 2015. Evaluation of the Social Cash Transfers Pilot Program Tigray Region, Ethiopia. Endline Report: Washington, DC, IFPRI.
- Bhalotra S, Heady C. 2003. Child farm labor: the wealth paradox. World Bank Economic Review 17(2): 197–227.
- Bourguignon F, Ferreira FHG, Leite PG. 2003. Conditional cash transfers, schooling, and child labor: micro-simulating Brazil's Bolsa Escola program. The World Bank Economic Review 17(2): 229–254.
- Campello TH, Neri MC. 2013. Bolsa Família Program: uma década de inclusão e cidadania. Ipea: Brasília; 2013.
- Cardoso E, Souza AP. 2004. The impact of cash transfers on child labor and school attendance in Brazil. Vanderbilt University working paper no. 04-W07. Vanderbilt, TN: Vanderbilt University.
- Daidone S, Pellerano L, Handa S, Davis B. 2015. Is graduation from social safety nets possible? Evidence from sub-Saharan Africa. IDS Bulletin 46: 93–102.
- Dammert A. 2009. Heterogeneous impacts of conditional cash transfers: evidence from Nicaragua. Economic Development and Cultural Change 58(1): 53–83.
- De Groot R. 2015. Schooling impacts of Ghana's LEAP program. UNICEF Office of Research - Innocenti Research Brief 2015–2006
- De Hoop J, Rosati FC. 2014. Cash transfers and child labor. World Bank policy research working paper no. 6826.
- de Janvry A, Sadoulet E, Solomon P, Vakis R. 2006. Uninsured Risk and Asset Prediction: Can Conditional Cash Transfer Programs Serve as Safety Nets? Social Protection Discussion Paper 0604. The World Bank: Washington DC.
- Del Carpio XV, Loayza NV. 2012. The impact of wealth on the amount and quality of child labor. World Bank policy research working paper 5959.
- Dietrich S, Malerba D, Barrientos A, Gassmann F, Mohnen P, Tirivayi N. 2020. Human capital returns to cash transfers in Uganda: does it matter in the long run? Journal of Development Effectiveness 12(1): 54–73.
- Fiszbein A, Schady NR. 2009. Conditional Cash Transfers: Reducing Present and Future Poverty. World Bank Policy Research Report. World Bank: Washington, DC, United States.
- Foster A, Rosenzweig M. 1994. A test for moral hazard in the labor market: contractual arrangements, efforts and health. Review of Economics and Statistics 76(2): 213–227.
- Galiani S, McEwan P. 2013. The heterogeneous impact of conditional cash transfers. Journal of Public Economics 103: 85–96.
- Gee K. 2010. Reducing child labor through conditional cash transfers: evidence from Nicaragua's Red de Protección Social. Development and Policy Review 28(6): 711–732.
- Gentilini U. 2015. In Social protection and labor discussion paper; no. 1504, Entering the city: emerging evidence and practices with safety nets in urban areas (English) (ed). World Bank Group: Washington, D.C.
- Hainmueller J. 2012. Entropy balancing for causal effects: a multivariate reweighting method to produce balanced samples in observational studies. Political Analysis 20: 25–46.
- Handa S, Natali L, Seidenfeld D, Tembo G. 2016. The impact of Zambia's unconditional child grant on schooling and work: results from a large-scale social experiment. Journal of Development Effectiveness 8(3): 346–367.
- Haushofer J, Shapiro J. 2016. The short-term impact of unconditional cash transfers to the poor: experimental evidence from Kenya. The Quarterly Journal of Economics 131(4): 1973–2042.
- Honorati M, Gentilini U, Yemtsov RG. 2015. The State of Social Safety Nets 2015. International Bank for Reconstruction and Development/The World Bank: Washington DC.
- International Labour Organization. 2002. Ethiopia—child domestic workers in Addis Ababa: a rapid assessment. IWFCL, no 38. https://www.ilo.org/ipec/Informationresources/WCMS_113249/lang--en/index.htm
- Kenya CT-OVC Evaluation Team. 2012. The impact of the Kenya cash transfer for orphans and vulnerable children on households spending. Journal of Development Effectiveness 4(1): 9–37.
- Lee M. 2005. Micro-Econometrics for Policy, Program, and Treatment Effects. Oxford: Springer.
10.1093/0199267693.001.0001 Google Scholar
- Moffitt R, McDonald J. 1980. The uses of tobit analysis. The Review of Economics and Statistics 62: 318–321. https://doi.org/10.2307/1924766
- Olinto P, De Souza PZ. 2005. An impact evaluation of the conditional cash transfers to education under PRAF: an experimental approach. Fundação Getúlio Vargas (FGV), Escola de Pós-Graduação em Economia (EPGE): Rio de Janeiro, Brazil.
- Pace N, Daidone S, Davis B, Pellerano L. 2019. Shaping cash transfer impacts through soft-conditions: evidence from Lesotho. Journal of African Economies 28(1): 39–69.
- Parker SW, Skoufias E. 2000. The Impact of Progresa on Work, Leisure, and Time Allocation. International Food Policy Research Institute: Washington, DC.
- Pellerano L, Moratti M, Jakobsen M, Bajgar M, Barca V. 2014. Child Grants Program Impact Evaluation: Follow-up Report. Oxford: Oxford Policy Management.
- Peruffo M, Ferreira PC. 2017. The long-term effects of conditional cash transfers on child labor and school enrollment. Economic Inquiry 55: 2008–2030.
- Prifti E, Estruch E, Daidone S, Davis B. 2018. How differences in cash transfer sizes affect work allocation decisions: evidence from cross-country comparisons in SSA. LABOR 32(3): 395–426.
10.1111/labr.12127 Google Scholar
- Prifti E, Vuri D. 2013. Employment protection and fertility: evidence from the 1990 Italian reform. Labor Economics 23: 77–88.
- Rascon E, Rubalcava L. 2008. Diagnóstico General de las Barreras a la Acumulación del Capital Humano en Zonas Urbanas en México (Perfil de la Pobreza Urbana). IDB: Washington DC.
- Rogers CA, Swinnerton KA. 2004. Does child labor decrease when parental incomes rise? Journal of Political Economy 112(4): 939–946.
- Schultz T. 2000. School Subsidies for the Poor: Evaluating a Mexican Strategy for Reducing Poverty; 2000. International Food Policy Research Institute: Washington, DC.
- Sebastian A, de la O Campos AP, Daidone S, Pace N, Davis B, Niang O, Pellerano L. 2019. Cash transfers and gender differentials in child schooling and labor: evidence from the Lesotho Child Grants Program. Population and Development Review 45: 181–208.
- Todd P, Wolpin K. 2006. Assessing the impact of a school subsidy program in Mexico: using a social experiment to validate a dynamic behavioral model of child schooling and fertility. American Economic Review 96(5): 1384–1417.
- Yap Y-T, Sedlacek G, Orazem PF. 2002. Limiting child labor through behavior-based income transfers: an experimental evaluation of the PETI program in rural Brazil. In Child Labor and Education in Latin America: An Economic Perspective, PF Orazem, G Sedlacek, Z Tzannatos (eds). New York: Palgrave-Macmillan.