Volume 18, Issue 3 p. 271-300
RESEARCH ARTICLE

Pain Education in the Context of Non-Specific Low Back Pain: The Lived Experience of the Physiotherapist. An Interpretive Phenomenological Analysis

Josh Wellman

Corresponding Author

Josh Wellman

University of Brighton, United Kingdom of Great Britain, United Kingdom

Correspondence

Josh Wellman, University of Brighton United Kingdom of Great Britain, United Kingdom.

Email: joshwellman@live.co.uk

Search for more papers by this author
Luke Murray

Luke Murray

University of Brighton, United Kingdom of Great Britain, United Kingdom

Search for more papers by this author
Clair Hebron

Clair Hebron

University of Brighton, United Kingdom of Great Britain, United Kingdom

Search for more papers by this author
Pirjo Vuoskoski

Pirjo Vuoskoski

University of Brighton, United Kingdom of Great Britain, United Kingdom

Search for more papers by this author
First published: 15 April 2020
Citations: 2

Abstract

Objectives

The aim of this study was to explore the physiotherapists' lived experiences of providing pain education (PE), to people living with non-specific low back pain (NSLBP). In previous studies, PE has been associated with positive clinical outcomes within the physiotherapeutic management of NSLBP. However, the meaning of providing PE, as experienced by physiotherapists, has not been specifically explored.

Methods

This study adopted a hermeneutic phenomenological approach to explore PE experiences. Six semi-structured interviews were conducted, interviews were transcribed and analysed in line with the ‘interpretative phenomenological analysis’ framework.

Results

Five main thematic meaning structures emerged: Experienced significance of assessment in understanding NSLBP, PE as explaining the nature of NSLBP, Experienced challenges in providing PE, individualisation as key to PE for NSLBP and Reassurance as central to PE for people living with NSLBP.

Conclusions

The significance of subjective assessment, was a key component of PE, as experienced by participants. However, differences were noted between participants in addressing the sense of assessment; in seeking a physiotherapeutic understanding of the NSLBP, and in seeking to understand the situation of those who are in pain. Within the participant experience, the significance of ‘patient’ reassurance was highlighted, related to the individualisation and outcome of PE. Reassurance, as described by participants, was emotive and practically grounded and linked with physical activity promotion. Individualisation in PE was meaningfully related to language modification and developing positive therapeutic relationships. Physiotherapists described PE particularly challenging related to pain chronicity and psychosocial factors, which may have significant implications to practice.

The full text of this article hosted at iucr.org is unavailable due to technical difficulties.