Volume 18, Issue 4 p. 425-433
RESEARCH ARTICLE

Exercise and education for knee osteoarthritis—What are accredited exercise physiologists providing?

Adrian Ram

Corresponding Author

Adrian Ram

School of Medical Sciences, The University of New South Wales, Sydney, Australia

Correspondence

Adrian Ram, School of Medical Sciences, The University of New South Wales, Sydney, Australia.

Email: adrian.ram@unsw.edu.au

Search for more papers by this author
John Booth

John Booth

School of Medical Sciences, The University of New South Wales, Sydney, Australia

Search for more papers by this author
Jeanette Thom

Jeanette Thom

School of Medical Sciences, The University of New South Wales, Sydney, Australia

Search for more papers by this author
Matthew D. Jones

Matthew D. Jones

School of Medical Sciences, The University of New South Wales, Sydney, Australia

Centre for IMPACT (Investigating Mechanisms of Pain, Advancing Clinical Translation), Neuroscience Research Australia, Sydney, Australia

Search for more papers by this author
First published: 05 June 2020
Citations: 5

Abstract

Objectives

Clinical guidelines for the non-surgical management of knee osteoarthritis (OA) recommend exercise and education. This study aimed to evaluate the extent to which accredited exercise physiologists (AEPs) deliver exercise and education for knee OA and how it aligns with clinical practice guidelines.

Design

Cross-sectional survey.

Method

An online survey targeted to AEPs across Australia to understand the exercise and education content of their interventions for knee OA. Likert scale and multiple-choice questions were used to measure responses relating to exercise prescription. Thematic analysis was used to evaluate the nature of education being delivered by AEPs. The revised neurophysiology of pain questionnaire (r-NPQ) was used to quantify pain neuroscience knowledge.

Results

A total of 161 AEPs completed the survey (63 men, 98 women; mean experience 5.8 ± 4.7 years). Exercises commonly prescribed included: strength (99% of respondents), weight bearing (90%) and aerobic (83%), with 98% of AEPs prescribing exercise for the affected and unaffected limb. Only 32% of respondents frequently considered prescribing ‘exercise into pain’. The four main education themes were exercise (86%), self-management (61%), weight loss (56%) and pain management (51%). Specific pain neuroscience education (PNE) was provided by only 21% of respondents.

Conclusions

Exercise prescription mostly aligned with evidence-based recommendations. The education component of AEP interventions for knee OA focused on the benefits of exercise. However, other education guideline recommendations about the disease, appropriate treatments and self-management were underutilised. The PNE knowledge of AEPs was comparable with other secondary care providers, although only a minority of AEPs provide PNE.

CONFLICT OF INTEREST

None declared.

The full text of this article hosted at iucr.org is unavailable due to technical difficulties.