Empirical Paper
Testing the Information-Seeking Theory of Openness/Intellect
Hayley K. Jach,
Luke D. Smillie,
Corresponding Author
Hayley K. Jach
Melbourne School of Psychological Sciences, The University of Melbourne, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia
Correspondence to: Hayley K. Jach, Melbourne School of Psychological Sciences, Melbourne University, Redmond Barry Building, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia 3010.
E-mail: hayleyjach@gmail.com
Search for more papers by this authorLuke D. Smillie
Melbourne School of Psychological Sciences, The University of Melbourne, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia
Search for more papers by this authorHayley K. Jach,
Luke D. Smillie,
Corresponding Author
Hayley K. Jach
Melbourne School of Psychological Sciences, The University of Melbourne, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia
Correspondence to: Hayley K. Jach, Melbourne School of Psychological Sciences, Melbourne University, Redmond Barry Building, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia 3010.
E-mail: hayleyjach@gmail.com
Search for more papers by this authorLuke D. Smillie
Melbourne School of Psychological Sciences, The University of Melbourne, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia
Search for more papers by this authorThis article earned Open Data, Open materials and Preregistered + Analysis Plan badges through Open Practices Disclosure from the Center for Open Science: https://osf.io/tvyxz/wiki.The data are permanently and openly accessible at https://osf.io/2hjfc/, https://osf.io/mnw3d/ and https://osf.io/saqhe/. The permanent path to the registration is openly accessible at https://osf.io/fsx5e. Author's disclosure form may also be found at the Supporting Information in the online version.
Abstract
Why are open people open? A recent theory suggests that openness/intellect reflects sensitivity to the reward value of information, but so far, this has undergone few direct tests. To assess preferences for information, we constructed a novel task, adapted from information-seeking paradigms within decision science, in which participants could choose to see information related to a guessing game they had just completed. Across two studies (one exploratory, n = 151; one confirmatory, n = 301), openness/intellect did not predict information seeking. Our results thus do not support a straightforward version of the theory, whereby open individuals display a general-purpose sensitivity to any sort of new information. However, trait curiosity (arguably a facet of openness/intellect) predicted information seeking in both studies, and uncertainty intolerance (inversely related to openness/intellect) predicted information seeking in Study 2. Thus, it is possible that the domain-level null association masks two divergent information-seeking pathways: one approach motivated (curiosity) and one avoidance motivated (uncertainty intolerance). It remains to be seen whether these conflicting motivations can be isolated and if doing so reveals any association between information-seeking and the broader openness/intellect domain. © 2020 European Association of Personality Psychology
Supporting Information
| Filename | Description |
|---|---|
| per2271-sup-0001-Open_Practices_Disclosure_Form.pdfPDF document, 658.1 KB |
Open Practices Disclosure Form |
| per2271-supp-0002-Supplementary Information.pdfPDF document, 1,015.9 KB |
Data S1. Supporting Information |
Please note: The publisher is not responsible for the content or functionality of any supporting information supplied by the authors. Any queries (other than missing content) should be directed to the corresponding author for the article.
REFERENCES
- Allen, T. A., & DeYoung, C. G. (2017). Personality neuroscience and the five factor model. In T. A. Widiger (Ed.), The Oxford handbook of the five factor model (pp. 319–352). New York, NY: Oxford University Press.
- Antinori, A., Carter, O. L., & Smillie, L. D. (2017). Seeing it both ways: Openness to experience and binocular rivalry suppression. Journal of Research in Personality, 68, 15–22. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jrp.2017.03.005.
- Beaty, R. E., Kaufman, S. B., Benedek, M., Jung, R. E., Kenett, Y. N., Jauk, E., … Silvia, P. J. (2016). Personality and complex brain networks: The role of openness to experience in default network efficiency. Human Brain Mapping, 37, 773–779. https://doi.org/10.1002/hbm.23065.
- Behrendt, S. (2014). lm.beta: Add standardized regression coefficients to lm-Objects. R package version 1.5-1. Retrieved from https://CRAN.R-project.org/package=lm.beta
- Belke, B., Leder, H., Strobach, T., & Carbon, C. C. (2010). Cognitive fluency: High-level processing dynamics in art appreciation. Psychology of Aesthetics, Creativity, and the Arts, 4, 214.
- Bennett, D., Bode, S., Brydevall, M., Warren, H., & Murawski, C. (2016). Intrinsic valuation of information in decision making under uncertainty. PLoS Computational Biology, 12, e1005020. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pcbi.1005020.
- Bennett, D., Sutcliffe, K., Tan, N. P. J., Smillie, L. D., & Bode, S. (2019). Anxious and obsessive-compulsive traits are independently associated with valuation of non-instrumental information. BioRxiv.. https://doi.org/10.1101/768168.
- Blanchard, T. C., Hayden, B. Y., & Bromberg-Martin, E. S. (2015). Orbitofrontal cortex uses distinct codes for different choice attributes in decisions motivated by curiosity. Neuron, 85, 602–614. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.neuron.2014.12.050.
- Bromberg-Martin, E. S., & Hikosaka, O. (2009). Midbrain dopamine neurons signal preference for advance information about upcoming rewards. Neuron, 63, 119–126. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.neuron.2009.06.009.
- Brydevall, M., Bennett, D., Murawski, C., & Bode, S. (2018). The neural encoding of information prediction errors during non-instrumental information seeking. Scientific Reports, 8, 6134. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-018-24566-x.
- Carleton, R. N., Mulvogue, M. K., Thibodeau, M. A., McCabe, R. E., Antony, M. M., & Asmundson, G. J. (2012). Increasingly certain about uncertainty: Intolerance of uncertainty across anxiety and depression. Journal of Anxiety Disorders, 26, 468–479. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.janxdis.2012.01.011.
- Carleton, R. N., Norton, M. P. J., & Asmundson, G. J. (2007). Fearing the unknown: A short version of the intolerance of uncertainty scale. Journal of Anxiety Disorders, 21, 105–117. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.janxdis.2006.03.014.
- Chamorro-Premuzic, T., Reimers, S., Hsu, A., & Ahmetoglu, G. (2011). Who art thou? Personality predictors of artistic preferences in a large UK sample: The importance of openness. British Journal of Psychology, 100, 501–516.
- Charpentier, C. J., Bromberg-Martin, E. S., & Sharot, T. (2018). Valuation of knowledge and ignorance in mesolimbic reward circuitry. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 115, E7255–E7264. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1800547115.
- Coxe, S., West, S. G., & Aiken, L. S. (2009). The analysis of count data: A gentle introduction to Poisson regression and its alternatives. Journal of Personality Assessment, 91, 121–136. https://doi.org/10.1080/00223890802634175.
- Denissen, J. J., & Penke, L. (2008). Motivational individual reaction norms underlying the Five-Factor model of personality: First steps towards a theory-based conceptual framework. Journal of Research in Personality, 42(5), 1285-1302. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jrp.2008.04.002
- Depue, R. A., & Collins, P. F. (1999). Neurobiology of the structure of personality: Dopamine, facilitation of incentive motivation, and extraversion. The Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 22, 491–569. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0140525X99002046.
- DeYoung, C. G. (2013). The neuromodulator of exploration: A unifying theory of the role of dopamine in personality. Frontiers in Human Neuroscience, 7, 762. https://doi.org/10.3389/fnhum.2013.00762.
- DeYoung, C. G. (2015a). Openness/intellect: A dimension of personality reflecting cognitive exploration. In M. Mikulincer, P. R. Shaver, M. L. Cooper, & R. J. Larsen (Eds.), APA handbooks in psychology. APA handbook of personality and social psychology, Vol. 4. Personality processes and individual differences (pp. 369–399). Washington, DC, US: American Psychological Association doi:10.1037/14343-017.
10.1037/14343-017 Google Scholar
- DeYoung, C. G. (2015b). Cybernetic Big Five theory. Journal of Research in Personality, 56, 33–58. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jrp.2014.07.004.
- DeYoung, C. G., Grazioplene, R. G., & Peterson, J. B. (2012). From madness to genius: The openness/intellect trait domain as a paradoxical simplex. Journal of Research in Personality, 46, 63–78. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jrp.2011.12.003.
- DeYoung, C. G., Peterson, J. B., & Higgins, D. M. (2005). Sources of openness/intellect: Cognitive and neuropsychological correlates of the fifth factor of personality. Journal of Personality, 73, 825–858. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-6494.2005.00330.x.
- DeYoung, C. G., Quilty, L. C., & Peterson, J. B. (2007). Between facets and domains: 10 aspects of the big five. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 93, 880–896. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.93.5.880.
- DeYoung, C. G., Quilty, L. C., Peterson, J. B., & Gray, J. R. (2014). Openness to experience, intellect, and cognitive ability. Journal of Personality Assessment, 96, 46–52. https://doi.org/10.1080/00223891.2013.806327.
- Dienes, Z. (2014). Using Bayes to get the most out of non-significant results. Frontiers in Psychology, 5, 781.
- Fastrich, G. M., Kerr, T., Castel, A. D., & Murayama, K. (2018). The role of interest in memory for trivia questions: An investigation with a large-scale database. Motivation Science, 4, 227–250. https://doi.org/10.1037/mot0000087.
- Fayn, K., Silvia, P. J., Dejonckheere, E., Verdonck, S., & Kuppens, P. (2019). Confused or curious? Openness/intellect predicts more positive interest-confusion relations. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 117, 1016–1033. https://doi.org/10.1037/pspp0000257.
- Gignac, G. E., & Szodorai, E. T. (2016). Effect size guidelines for individual differences researchers. Personality and Individual Differences, 102, 74–78. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.paid.2016.06.069.
- Gosling, S. D., Ko, S. J., Mannarelli, T., & Morris, M. E. (2002). A room with a cue: Personality judgments based on offices and bedrooms. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 82, 379–398. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.82.3.379.
- Gottlieb, J., Oudeyer, P. Y., Lopes, M., & Baranes, A. (2013). Information-seeking, curiosity, and attention: Computational and neural mechanisms. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 17, 585–593. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tics.2013.09.001.
- Gruber, M. J., Gelman, B. D., & Ranganath, C. (2014). States of curiosity modulate hippocampus-dependent learning via the dopaminergic circuit. Neuron, 84, 486–496. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.neuron.2014.08.060.
- Hudson, N. W., & Fraley, R. C. (2015). Volitional personality trait change: Can people choose to change their personality traits? Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 109, 490–507. https://doi.org/10.1037/pspp0000021.
- Jach, H. K., & Smillie, L. D. (2019). To fear or fly to the unknown: Tolerance for ambiguity and Big Five personality traits. Journal of Research in Personality, 79, 67–78. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jrp.2019.02.003.
- Jacques-Hamilton, R., Sun, J., & Smillie, L. D. (2019). Costs and benefits of acting extraverted: A randomized controlled trial. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 148, 1538–1556. https://doi.org/10.1037/xge0000516.
- Jeffreys, H. (1939/1961). The theory of probability ( 1st/3rd ed.). Oxford, England: Oxford University Press.
- John, O. P., & Srivastava, S. (1999). The Big Five trait taxonomy: History, measurement, and theoretical perspectives. In L. A. Pervin, & O. P. John (Eds.), Handbook of personality: Theory and research (pp. 102–138). Guilford Press.
- Jost, J. T., Glaser, J., Kruglanski, A. W., & Sulloway, F. J. (2003). Political conservatism as motivated social cognition. Psychological Bulletin, 129, 339–375. https://doi.org/10.1037/0033-2909.129.3.339.
- Kang, M. J., Hsu, M., Krajbich, I. M., Loewenstein, G., McClure, S. M., Wang, J. T. Y., & Camerer, C. F. (2009). The wick in the candle of learning: Epistemic curiosity activates reward circuitry and enhances memory. Psychological Science, 20, 963–973. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9280.2009.02402.x.
- Kashdan, T. B., Gallagher, M. W., Silvia, P. J., Winterstein, B. P., Breen, W. E., Terhar, D., & Steger, M. F. (2009). The curiosity and exploration inventory-II: Development, factor structure, and psychometrics. Journal of Research in Personality, 43, 987–998. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jrp.2009.04.011.
- Kashdan, T. B., Rose, P., & Fincham, F. D. (2004). Curiosity and exploration: Facilitating positive subjective experiences and personal growth opportunities. Journal of Personality Assessment, 82, 291–305. https://doi.org/10.1207/s15327752jpa8203_05.
- Kashdan, T. B., & Steger, M. F. (2007). Curiosity and pathways to well-being and meaning in life: Traits, states, and everyday behaviors. Motivation and Emotion, 31, 159–173. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11031-007-9068-7.
- Kashdan, T. B., Stiksma, M. C., Disabato, D. J., McKnight, P. E., Bekier, J., Kaji, J., & Lazarus, R. (2018). The five-dimensional curiosity scale: Capturing the bandwidth of curiosity and identifying four unique subgroups of curious people. Journal of Research in Personality, 73, 130–149. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jrp.2017.11.011.
- Kaufman, S. B., Quilty, L. C., Grazioplene, R. G., Hirsh, J. B., Gray, J. R., Peterson, J. B., & DeYoung, C. G. (2016). Openness to experience and intellect differentially predict creative achievement in the arts and sciences. Journal of Personality, 84, 248–258. https://doi.org/10.1111/jopy.12156.
- Kobayashi, K., Ravaioli, S., Baranès, A., Woodford, M., & Gottlieb, J. (2019). Diverse motives for human curiosity. Nature Human Behaviour, 3, 587–595. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41562-019-0589-3.
- Kraaykamp, G., & Van Eijck, K. (2005). Personality, media preferences, and cultural participation. Personality and Individual Differences, 38, 1675–1688. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.paid.2004.11.002.
- Kretzschmar, A., Spengler, M., Schubert, A. L., Steinmayr, R., & Ziegler, M. (2018). The relation of personality and intelligence—What can the Brunswik symmetry principle tell us? Journal of Intelligence, 6, 30. https://doi.org/10.3390/jintelligence6030030.
10.3390/jintelligence6030030 Google Scholar
- Ligneul, R., Mermillod, M., & Morisseau, T. (2018). From relief to surprise: Dual control of epistemic curiosity in the human brain. NeuroImage, 181, 490–500. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.neuroimage.2018.07.038.
- Lowenstein, G. (1994). The psychology of curiosity: A review and reinterpretation. Psychological Bulletin, 116, 75–98. https://doi.org/10.1037/0033-2909.116.1.75.
- Lydon-Staley, D. M., Zhou, D., Blevins, A. S., Zurn, P., & Bassett, D. S. (2019). Hunters, busybodies, and the knowledge network building associated with curiosity. PsyArXiv. https://doi.org/10.31234/osf.io/undy4.
- Marvin, C. B., & Shohamy, D. (2016). Curiosity and reward: Valence predicts choice and information prediction errors enhance learning. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 145, 266–272. https://doi.org/10.1037/xge0000140.
- McCrae, R. R. (1987). Creativity, divergent thinking, and openness to experience. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 52, 1258–1265. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.52.6.1258.
- McCrae, R. R., & Costa, P. T. Jr. (1997). Conceptions and correlates of openness to experience. In Handbook of personality psychology (pp. 825–847). Academic Press.
10.1016/B978-012134645-4/50032-9 Google Scholar
- McLain, D. L. (2009). Evidence of the properties of an ambiguity tolerance measure: The multiple stimulus types ambiguity tolerance scale–II (MSTAT–II). Psychological Reports, 105, 975–988. https://doi.org/10.2466/pr0.105.3.975-988.
- Morey, R. D., & Rouder, J. N. (2018). BayesFactor: Computation of Bayes factors for common designs. R package version 0.9.12–4.2. https://CRAN.R-project.org/package=BayesFactor
- Mõttus, R. (2016). Towards more rigorous personality trait–outcome research. European Journal of Personality, 30, 292–303. https://doi.org/10.1002/per.2041.
- Mussel, P. (2013). Intellect: A theoretical framework for personality traits related to intellectual achievements. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 104, 885–906. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0031918.
- Pickering, A. D., & Gray, J. A. (2001). Dopamine, appetitive reinforcement, and the neuropsychology of human learning: An individual differences approach. In A. Eliasz, & A. Angleitner (Eds.), Advances in research on temperament (pp. 113–149). Lengerich: PABST Science Publishers.
- Rammsayer, T. H. (1998). Extraversion and dopamine: Individual differences in respon- siveness to changes in dopaminergic activity as a possible biological basis of extra- version. European Psychologist, 3, 37–50. https://doi.org/10.1027/1016-9040.3.1.37.
- R Core Team. (2019). R: A language and environment for statistical computing. R Foundation for Statistical Computing. Vienna, Austria. URL https://www.R-project.org/
- Rentfrow, P. J., & Gosling, S. D. (2003). The do re mi's of everyday life: The structure and personality correlates of music preferences. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 84, 1236–1256. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.84.6.1236.
- Revelle, W. (2018). Psych: Procedures for personality and psychological research. Evanston, Illinois, USA: Northwestern University Retrieved from https://CRAN.R-project.org/package=psych.
- Rosseel, Y. (2012). lavaan: An R package for structural equation modeling. Journal of Statistical Software, 48, 1–36.
- Rouder, J. N., & Morey, R. D. (2012). Default Bayes factors for model selection in regression. Multivariate Behavioral Research, 47, 877–903. https://doi.org/10.1080/00273171.2012.734737.
- Schwaba, T. (2019). The structure, measurement, and development of openness to experience across adulthood. In D. P. McAdams, R. L. Shiner, & J. L. Tackett (Eds.), Handbook of personality development. Guilford Publications.
- Scollon, C. N., Prieto, C. K., & Diener, E. (2009). Experience sampling: Promises and pitfalls, strength and weaknesses. In E. Diener (Ed.), Assessing well-being (pp. 157–180). Dordrecht: Springer DOI: 10.1007/978-90-481-2354-4_8.
10.1007/978-90-481-2354-4_8 Google Scholar
- Shannon, C. E. (1948). A mathematical theory of communication. Bell System Technical Journal, 27, 379–423. https://doi.org/10.1002/j.1538-7305.1948.tb01338.x.
- Silvia, P. J., Nusbaum, E. C., Berg, C., Martin, C., & O'Connor, A. (2009). Openness to experience, plasticity, and creativity: Exploring lower-order, high-order, and interactive effects. Journal of Research in Personality, 43, 1087–1090. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jrp.2009.04.015.
- Smillie, L. D. (2019). Does openness/intellect predict dopaminergic non-instrumental information-seeking? Symposium talk presented at the World Conference on Personality, Hanoi, Vietnam.
- Soto, C. J., & John, O. P. (2017). The next Big Five Inventory (BFI-2): Developing and assessing a hierarchical model with 15 facets to enhance bandwidth, fidelity, and predictive power. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 113, 117–143. https://doi.org/10.1037/pspp0000096.
- Stanley, D. (2018). apaTables: Create American Psychological Association (APA) style tables. R package version 2.0.5. Retrieved from https://CRAN.R-project.org/package=apaTables3
- Trapp, S., & Ziegler, M. (2019). How openness enriches the environment: Read more. Frontiers in Psychology, 10. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2019.01123.
- Underwood, B. J. (1975). Individual differences as a crucible in theory construction. American Psychologist, 302), 128. https://doi.org/10.1037/h0076759.
- Van Eijck, K., & de Graaf, P. M. (2004). The Big Five at school: The impact of personality on educational attainment. The Netherlands Journal of Social Sciences, 40, 24–40.
- von Stumm, S. (2018). Better open than intellectual: The benefits of investment personality traits for learning. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 44, 562–573. https://doi.org/10.1177/0146167217744526.
- Westfall, J., & Yarkoni, T. (2016). Statistically controlling for confounding constructs is harder than you think. PLoS ONE, 11, e0152719. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0152719.
- Wickham, H. (2017). tidyverse: Easily install and load the ‘Tidyverse’. R package version 1.2.1. Retrieved from https://CRAN.R-project.org/package=tidyverse
- Wilke, C. O. (2018). cowplot: Streamlined plot theme and plot annotations for ‘ggplot2’. R package version 0.9.3. Retrieved from https://CRAN.R-project.org/package=cowplot
- Woo, S. E., Chernyshenko, O. S., Longley, A., Zhang, Z. X., Chiu, C. Y., & Stark, S. E. (2014). Openness to experience: Its lower level structure, measurement, and cross-cultural equivalence. Journal of Personality Assessment, 96, 29–45. https://doi.org/10.1080/00223891.2013.806328.
- Yentes R.D., & Wilhelm, F. (2018). careless: Procedures for computing indices of careless responding. R package version 1.1.3.
- Ziegler, M., Schroeter, T. A., Lüdtke, O., & Roemer, L. (2018). The enriching interplay between openness and interest: A theoretical elaboration of the OFCI model and a first empirical test. Journal of Intelligence, 6, 35. https://doi.org/10.3390/jintelligence6030035.
10.3390/jintelligence6030035 Google Scholar
