Subjectifying the Personality State: Theoretical Underpinnings and an Empirical Example
Corresponding Author
Gal Lazarus
Psychology Department, Bar-Ilan University, Ramat Gan, Israel
Correspondence to: Gal Lazarus, Psychology Department, Bar-Ilan University, Ramat Gan 5290002, Israel.
E-mail: gal.lazarus@gmail.com
Search for more papers by this authorHaran Sened
Psychology Department, Bar-Ilan University, Ramat Gan, Israel
Search for more papers by this authorEshkol Rafaeli
Psychology Department, Bar-Ilan University, Ramat Gan, Israel
Barnard College, Columbia University, New York, NY, USA
Search for more papers by this authorCorresponding Author
Gal Lazarus
Psychology Department, Bar-Ilan University, Ramat Gan, Israel
Correspondence to: Gal Lazarus, Psychology Department, Bar-Ilan University, Ramat Gan 5290002, Israel.
E-mail: gal.lazarus@gmail.com
Search for more papers by this authorHaran Sened
Psychology Department, Bar-Ilan University, Ramat Gan, Israel
Search for more papers by this authorEshkol Rafaeli
Psychology Department, Bar-Ilan University, Ramat Gan, Israel
Barnard College, Columbia University, New York, NY, USA
Search for more papers by this authorAbstract
Recent developments in personality research highlight the value of modelling dynamic state-like manifestations of personality. The present work integrates these developments with prominent clinical models addressing within-person multiplicity and promotes the exploration of models centred on state-like manifestations of personality that function as cohesive organizational units. Such units possess distinct subjective qualities and are characterized by specific affects, behaviours, cognitions, and desires that tend to be co-activated. As background, we review both theory and research from the fields of social cognition, psychotherapy, and psychopathology that serve as the foundation for such models. We then illustrate our ideas in greater detail with one well-supported clinical model—the schema therapy mode model, chosen because it provides a finite and definite set of modes (i.e. cohesive personality states). We assessed these modes using a newly developed experience-sampling measure administered to 52 individuals (four times daily for 15 days). We estimated intraindividual and group-level temporal and contemporaneous networks based on the within-person variance as well as between-person network. We discuss findings from exemplar participants and from group-level networks and address cross-model particularities and consistencies. In conclusion, we consider potential idiographic and nomothetic applications of subjective states dynamic personality research based on intensive longitudinal methods. © 2020 European Association of Personality Psychology
Open Research
Open Research Badges
This article earned Open Data and Open Materials badges through Open Practices Disclosure from the Center for Open Science: https://osf.io/tvyxz/wiki. The data and materials are permanently and openly accessible at https://osf.io/jkxzn/. Author's disclosure form may also be found at the Supporting Information in the online version.
Supporting Information
Filename | Description |
---|---|
per2278-sup-0001-Open_Practices_Disclosure_Form.pdfPDF document, 649.4 KB |
Supporting info item |
Please note: The publisher is not responsible for the content or functionality of any supporting information supplied by the authors. Any queries (other than missing content) should be directed to the corresponding author for the article.
References
- Adler, J. M., Chin, E. D., Kolisetty, A. P., & Oltmanns, T. F. (2012). The distinguishing characteristics of narrative identity in adults with features of borderline personality disorder: An empirical investigation. Journal of Personality Disorders, 26, 498–512. https://doi.org/10.1521/pedi.2012.26.4.498
- Allport, G. W. (1955). Becoming. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.
- Arntz, A., Klokman, J., & Sieswerda, S. (2005). An experimental test of the schema mode model of borderline personality disorder. Journal of Behavior Therapy and Experimental Psychiatry, 36, 226–239. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbtep.2005.05.005
- Bach, B., & Bernstein, D. P. (2019). Schema therapy conceptualization of personality functioning and traits in ICD-11 and DSM-5. Current Opinion in Psychiatry, 32, 38–49. https://doi.org/10.1097/YCO.0000000000000464
- Bamelis, L. L., Evers, S. M., Spinhoven, P., & Arntz, A. (2014). Results of a multicenter randomized controlled trial of the clinical effectiveness of schema therapy for personality disorders. American Journal of Psychiatry, 171, 305–322. https://doi.org/10.1176/appi.ajp.2013.12040518
- Bandura, A. (1999). Social cognitive theory of personality. In D. Cervone, & Y. Shoda (Eds.), The coherence of personality: Social-cognitive bases of consistency, variability, and organization (pp. 185–241). New York: Guilford Press.
- Bastiaansen, J. A., Kunkels, Y. K., Blaauw, F., Boker, S. M., Ceulemans, E., Chen, M., … Bringmann, L. F. (2019, May 12). Time to get personal? The impact of researchers' choices on the selection of treatment targets using the experience sampling methodology. https://doi.org/10.31234/osf.io/c8vp7
- Baumert, A., Schmitt, M., Perugini, M., Johnson, W., Blum, G., Borkenau, P., & Jayawickreme, E. (2017). Integrating personality structure, personality process, and personality development. European Journal of Personality, 31, 503–528. https://doi.org/10.1002/per.2115
- Beck, A. T. (1976). Cognitive therapy and the emotional disorders. New York: International Universities Press.
- Beck, E. D., & Jackson, J. J. (2017). The search for a bridge: Idiographic personality networks. European Journal of Personality., 31, 529–595.
- Block, J. (1961). Ego identity, role variability, and adjustment. Journal of Consulting Psychology, 25, 392–397.
- Borsboom, D. (2017a). A network theory of mental disorders. World Psychiatry, 16, 5–13. https://doi.org/10.1002/wps.20375
- Borsboom, D. (2017b). Mental disorders, network models, and dynamical systems. In: K.S. Kendler, J. Parnas (Eds.), Philosophical issues in psychiatry IV: Psychiatric nosology DSM-5 (International Perspectives in Philosophy and Psychiatry). New York: Oxford University Press.
- Borsboom, D., & Cramer, A. O. J. (2013). Network analysis: An integrative approach to the structure of psychopathology. Annual Review of Clinical Psychology, 9, 91–121. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev-clinpsy-050212-185608
- Bos, F. M., Snippe, E., de Vos, S., Hartmann, J. A., Simons, C. J., van der Krieke, L., & Wichers, M. (2017). Can we jump from cross-sectional to dynamic interpretations of networks implications for the network perspective in psychiatry. Psychotherapy and Psychosomatics, 86, 175–177. https://doi.org/10.1159/000453583
- Bringmann, L. F., Hamaker, E. L., Vigo, D. E., Aubert, A., Borsboom, D., & Tuerlinckx, F. (2017). Changing dynamics: Time-varying autoregressive models using generalized additive modeling. Psychological Methods, 22, 409–425. https://doi.org/10.1037/met0000085
- Bringmann, L. F., Vissers, N., Wichers, M., Geschwind, N., Kuppens, P., Peeters, F., … Tuerlinckx, F. (2013). A network approach to psychopathology: New insights into clinical longitudinal data. PLoS ONE, 8, e60188. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0060188
- Bromberg, P. M. (1998). Standing in the spaces: Essays on clinical process, trauma, and dissociation. Hillsdale, NJ: Analytic Press.
- Campbell, J. D., Trapnell, P. D., Heine, S. J., Katz, I. M., Lavallee, L. F., & Lehman, D. R. (1996). Self-concept clarity: Measurement, personality correlates, and cultural boundaries. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 70, 141–156. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.70.1.141
- Costantini, G., Richetin, J., Preti, E., Casini, E., Epskamp, S., & Perugini, M. (2019). Stability and variability of personality networks. A tutorial on recent developments in network psychometrics. Personality and Individual Differences, 136, 68–78. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.paid.2017.06.011
- Cranford, J. A., Shrout, P. E., Iida, M., Rafaeli, E., Yip, T., & Bolger, N. (2006). A procedure for evaluating sensitivity to within-person change: Can mood measures in diary studies detect change reliably? Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 32, 917–929. https://doi.org/10.1177/0146167206287721
- Dejonckheere, E., Mestdagh, M., Houben, M., Rutten, I., Sels, L., Kuppens, P., & Tuerlinckx, F. (2019). Complex affect dynamics add limited information to the prediction of psychological well-being. Nature Human Behaviour, 3, 478–491. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41562-019-0555-0
- Derogatis, L. R., & Melisaratos, N. (1983). The Brief Symptom Inventory: An introductory report. Psychological Medicine, 13, 595–605. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0033291700048017
- Dimaggio, G., Semerari, A., Carcione, A., Nicolò, G., & Procacci, M. (2007). Psychotherapy of personality disorders: Metacognition, states of mind and interpersonal cycles. London: Routledge 10.4324/9780203939536.
10.4324/9780203939536 Google Scholar
- Dimaggio, G., & Stiles, W. B. (2007). Psychotherapy in light of internal multiplicity. Journal of Clinical Psychology, 63, 119–127. https://doi.org/10.1002/jclp.20335
- Dörfel, D., Lamke, J. P., Hummel, F., Wagner, U., Erk, S., & Walter, H. (2014). Common and differential neural networks of emotion regulation by detachment, reinterpretation, distraction, and expressive suppression: A comparative fMRI investigation. Neuroimage, 101, 298–309. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.neuroimage.2014.06.051
- Dorman, C., & Griffin, M. A. (2015). Optimal time lags in panel studies. Psychological Methods, 20, 487–505. https://doi.org/10.1037/met0000041
- Dunlop, W. L. (2015). Contextualized personality, beyond traits. European Journal of Personality, 29, 310–325. https://doi.org/10.1002/per.1995
- Dwyer, D. B., Falkai, P., & Koutsouleris, N. (2018). Machine learning approaches for clinical psychology and psychiatry. Annual Review of Clinical Psychology, 14, 91–118. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev-clinpsy-032816-045037
- Elliott, R., & Greenberg, L. S. (2007). The essence of process-experiential/emotion-focused therapy. American Journal of Psychotherapy, 61, 241–254. https://doi.org/10.1176/appi.psychotherapy.2007.61.3.241
- Elliott, R., Watson, J., Goldman, R., & Greenberg, L. S. (2003). Learning emotion-focused therapy: The process-experiential approach to change. Washington, DC: APA.
- Epskamp, S. (2017). graphicalVAR: Graphical VAR for experience sampling data. Retrieved from http://cran.r-project.org/package=graphicalVAR
- Epskamp, S., Borsboom, D., & Fried, E. I. (2018). Estimating psychological networks and their accuracy: A tutorial paper. Behavior Research Methods, 50, 195–212. https://doi.org/10.3758/s13428-017-0862-1
- Epskamp, S., Cramer, A., Waldorp, L., Schmittmann, V. D., & Borsboom, D. (2012). qgraph: Network visualizations of relationships in psychometric data. Journal of Statistical Software, 48, 1–18. https://doi.org/10.18637/jss.v048.i04
- Epskamp, S., & Fried, E. I. (2018). A tutorial on regularized partial correlation networks. Psychological Methods, 23, 617–634. https://doi.org/10.1037/met0000167
- Epskamp, S., Fried, E. I., van Borkulo, C. D., Robinaugh, D. J., Marsman, M., Dalege, J., & Cramer, A. O. (2018). Investigating the utility of fixed-margin sampling in network psychometrics. Multivariate Behavioral Research, 1–15. https://doi.org/10.1080/00273171.2018.1489771
- Epskamp, S., van Borkulo, C. D., van der Veen, D. C., Servaas, M. N., Isvoranu, A. M., Riese, H., & Cramer, A. O. (2018). Personalized network modeling in psychopathology: The importance of contemporaneous and temporal connections. Clinical Psychological Science, 6, 416–427. https://doi.org/10.1177/2F2167702617744325
- Epskamp, S., Waldorp, L. J., Mõttus, R., & Borsboom, D. (2018). The Gaussian graphical model in cross-sectional and time-series data. Multivariate Behavioral Research, 53, 453–480. https://doi.org/10.1080/00273171.2018.1454823
- Fassbinder, E., Brand-de, W. O., & Arntz, A. (2019). Case formulation in schema therapy: Working with the mode model. In U. Kramer (Ed.), Case formulation in personality disorders. New York: Elsevier Books 10.1016/B978-0-12-813521-1.00005-9.
10.1016/B978-0-12-813521-1.00005-9 Google Scholar
- Fisher, A. J., Bosley, H. G., Fernandez, K. C., Reeves, J. W., Soyster, P. D., Diamond, A. E., & Barkin, J. (2019). Open trial of a personalized modular treatment for mood and anxiety. Behaviour Research and Therapy, 116, 69–79. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.brat.2019.01.010
- Fisher, A. J., Medaglia, J. D., & Jeronimus, B. F. (2018). Lack of group-to-individual generalizability is a threat to human subjects research. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 115, E6106–E6115. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1711978115
- Fisher, A. J., Reeves, J. W., Lawyer, G., Medaglia, J. D., & Rubel, J. A. (2017). Exploring the idiographic dynamics of mood and anxiety via network analysis. Journal of Abnormal Psychology, 126, 1044–1056. https://doi.org/10.1037/abn0000311
- Fleeson, W. (2001). Toward a structure- and process-integrated view of personality: Traits as density distributions of states. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 80, 1011–1027. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.80.6.1011
- Forbes, M. K., Wright, A. G., Markon, K. E., & Krueger, R. F. (2017). Evidence that psychopathology symptom networks have limited replicability. Journal of Abnormal Psychology, 126, 969–988. https://doi.org/10.1037/abn0000276
- Foygel, R., & Drton, M. (2010). Extended Bayesian information criteria for Gaussian graphical models. Advances in Neural Information Processing Systems, 23, 2020–2028 Retrieved from https://arxiv.org/abs/1011.6640
- Fraley, R. C., Heffernan, M. E., Vicary, A. M., & Brumbaugh, C. C. (2011). The Experiences in Close Relationships—Relationship Structures Questionnaire: A method for assessing attachment orientations across relationships. Psychological Assessment, 23, 615–625. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0022898
- Gallagher, S. (2012). Multiple aspects in the sense of agency. New Ideas in Psychology, 30, 15–31. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.newideapsych.2010.03.003
- Gates, K. M., Lane, S. T., Varangis, E., Giovanello, K., & Guiskewicz, K. (2017). Unsupervised classification during time-series model building. Multivariate Behavioral Research, 52, 129–148. https://doi.org/10.1080/00273171.2016.1256187
- Geukes, K., & Back, M. D. (2017). Towards a process-based understanding of personality structure, development, consequences, and assessment: Systemizing personality processes into state domains and sequences. European Journal of Personality, 31, 543–545. https://doi.org/10.1002/per
- Geukes, K., van Zalk, M., & Back, M. D. (2018). Understanding personality development: An integrative state process model. International Journal of Behavioral Development, 42, 43–51. https://doi.org/10.1177/0165025416677847
- Gilbert, P., Baldwin, M. W., Irons, C., Baccus, J. R., & Palmer, M. (2006). Self-criticism and self-warmth: An imagery study exploring their relation to depression. Journal of Cognitive Psychotherapy, 20, 183–200. https://doi.org/10.1891/jcop.20.2.183
10.1891/jcop.20.2.183 Google Scholar
- Han, H. A., Olson, M. A., & Fazio, R. H. (2006). The influence of experimentally created extrapersonal associations on the Implicit Association Test. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 42, 259–272. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jesp.2005.04.006
- Hermans, H. J. (2001). The dialogical self: Toward a theory of personal and cultural positioning. Culture & Psychology, 7, 243–281. https://doi.org/10.1177/1354067X0173001
- Higgins, E. T. (1987). Self-discrepancy: A theory relating self and affect. Psychological Review, 94, 319–340. https://doi.org/10.1037/0033-295X.94.3.319
- Hofmann, S. G., & Hayes, S. C. (2019). The future of intervention science: Process-based therapy. Clinical Psychological Science, 7, 37–50. https://doi.org/10.1177/2167702618772296
- Holgado-Tello, F. P., Chacón-Moscoso, S., Barbero-García, I., & Vila-Abad, E. (2010). Polychoric versus Pearson correlations in exploratory and confirmatory factor analysis of ordinal variables. Quality & Quantity, 44, 153–166. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11135-008-9190-y
- Hopwood, C. J. (2018). Interpersonal dynamics in personality and personality disorders. European Journal of Personality, 32, 499–524. https://doi.org/10.1002/per.2155
- Hopwood, C. J., Pincus, A. L., & Wright, A. G. C. (2019). The interpersonal situation: Integrating clinical assessment, formulation, and intervention. In D. B. Samuel, & D. Lynam (Eds.), Using basic personality research to inform personality pathology (pp. 95–121). Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press.
- Hox, J. (2010). Multilevel analysis: Techniques and applications. New York: Routledge 10.4324/9780203852279.
10.4324/9780203852279 Google Scholar
- Jacobs, I., Lenz, L., Wollny, A., & Horsch, A. (2018). The higher-order structure of schema modes. Journal of Personality Disorders, 1–29. https://doi.org/10.1521/pedi_2018_32_401
- James, W. (1950). The principles of psychology. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press (Original work published 1890).
- Janet, P. (1907). The major symptoms of hysteria. New York, NY: Macmillan 10.1037/10008-000.
10.1037/10008-000 Google Scholar
- Jayawickreme, E., Zachry, C. E., & Fleeson, W. (2019). Whole trait theory: An integrative approach to examining personality structure and process. Personality and Individual Differences, 136, 2–11. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.paid.2018.06.045
- Kelly, G. A. (1955). The psychology of personal constructs 1–2. New York: Norton.
- Kotov, R., Krueger, R. F., Watson, D., Achenbach, T. M., Althoff, R. R., Bagby, M., … Zimmerman, M. (2017). The Hierarchical Taxonomy of Psychopathology (HiTOP): A dimensional alternative to traditional nosologies. Journal of Abnormal Psychology, 126, 454–477. https://doi.org/10.1037/abn0000258
- van der Krieke, L., Emerencia, A. C., Bos, E. H., Rosmalen, J. G., Riese, H., Aiello, M., … de Jonge, P. (2015). Ecological momentary assessments and automated time series analysis to promote tailored health care: A proof-of-principle study. JMIR Research Protocols, 4, e100. https://doi.org/10.2196/resprot.4000
- Kross, E., & Ayduk, O. (2017). Self-distancing: Theory, research, and current directions. In J. M. Olson (Ed.), Advances in experimental social psychology (pp. 81–136), 55. Cambridge, MA: Academic Press https://doi.org/10.1016/bs.aesp.2016.10.002
- Kross, E., & Grossmann, I. (2012). Boosting wisdom: Distance from the self enhances wise reasoning, attitudes, and behavior. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 141, 43–48. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0024158
- Krueger, R. F., & Markon, K. E. (2014). The role of the DSM-5 personality trait model in moving toward a quantitative and empirically based approach to classifying personality and psychopathology. Annual Review of Clinical Psychology, 10, 477–501. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev-clinpsy-032813-153732
- Levinson, C. A., Vanzhula, I. A., & Brosof, L. C. (2018). Longitudinal and personalized networks of eating disorder cognitions and behaviors: Targets for precision intervention a proof of concept study.. International Journal of Eating Disorders, 51, 1233–1243. https://doi.org/10.1002/eat.22952
- Linville, P. W. (1987). Self-complexity as a cognitive buffer against stress-related illness and depression. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 52, 663–676. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.52.4.663
- Lobbestael, J., van Vreeswijk, M., Spinhoven, P., Schouten, E., & Arntz, A. (2010). Reliability and validity of the short Schema Mode Inventory (SMI). Behavioural and Cognitive Psychotherapy, 38, 437–458. https://doi.org/10.1017/S1352465810000226
- Longe, O., Maratos, F. A., Gilbert, P., Evans, G., Volker, F., Rockliff, H., & Rippon, G. (2010). Having a word with yourself: Neural correlates of self-criticism and self-reassurance. NeuroImage, 49, 1849–1856. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.neuroimage.2009.09.019
- McAdams, D. P. (1996). Personality, modernity, and the storied self: A contemporary framework for studying persons. Psychological Inquiry, 7, 295–321. https://doi.org/10.1177/1745691612464657
- McAdams, D. P. (2013). The psychological self as actor, agent, and author. Perspectives on Psychological Science, 8, 272–295. https://doi.org/10.1177/1745691612464657
- Mead, G. H. (1934). Mind, self, and society. Chicago: University of Chicago.
10.2307/3822971 Google Scholar
- Molenaar, P. C. (2004). A manifesto on psychology as idiographic science: Bringing the person back into scientific psychology, this time forever. Measurement, 2, 201–218. https://doi.org/10.1207/s15366359mea0204_1
10.1207/s15366359mea0204_1 Google Scholar
- Nijenhuis, E. R., & Van der Hart, O. (2011). Dissociation in trauma: A new definition and comparison with previous formulations. Journal of Trauma & Dissociation, 12, 416–445. https://doi.org/10.1080/15299732.2011.570592
- Osatuke, K., Stiles, W. B., Barkham, M., Hardy, G. E., & Shapiro, D. A. (2011). Relationship between mental states in depression: The assimilation model perspective. Psychiatry Research, 190, 52–59. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.psychres.2010.11.001
- Piccirillo, M. L., & Rodebaugh, T. L. (2019). Foundations of idiographic methods in psychology and applications for psychotherapy. Clinical Psychology Review., 71, 90–100. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cpr.2019.01.002
- Pos, A. E., & Greenberg, L. S. (2012). Organizing awareness and increasing emotion regulation: Revising chair work in emotion-focused therapy for borderline personality disorder. Journal of Personality Disorders, 26, 84–107. https://doi.org/10.1521/pedi.2012.26.1.84
- Pugh, M. (2015). A narrative review of schemas and schema therapy outcomes in the eating disorders. Clinical Psychology Review, 39, 30–41. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cpr.2015.04.003
- Rafaeli, E., Bernstein, D. P., & Young, J. (2011). Schema therapy: Distinctive features. New York: Routledge.
- Rafaeli, E., Maurer, O., Lazarus, G., & Thoma, N. C. (2016). The self in schema therapy. In M. Kyrios, R. Moulding, G. Doron, N. Nedeljkovic, S. S. Bhar, & M. Mikulincer (Eds.), The self in understanding and treating psychological disorders (pp. 59–48). Cambridge, United Kingdom: Cambridge University Press 10.1017/CBO9781139941297.008.
10.1017/CBO9781139941297.008 Google Scholar
- Ram, N., & Diehl, M. (2015). Multiple time-scale design and analysis: Pushing towards real-time modeling of complex developmental processes. In M. Diehl, K. Hooker, & M. Sliwinski (Eds.), Handbook of intraindividual variability across the lifespan (pp. 308–323). New York, NY: Routledge.
- Rauthmann, J. F., Beckmann, N., Noftle, E. E., & Sherman, R. A. (2019). Personality dynamics: A new frontier in personality psychology. Personality and Individual Differences, 136, 1. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.paid.2018.07.012
- Rauthmann, J. F., Jones, A. B., & Sherman, R. A. (2016). Directionality of person–situation transactions: Are there spillovers among and between situation experiences and personality states? Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 42, 893–909. https://doi.org/10.1177/0146167216647360
- Renner, F., DeRubeis, R., Arntz, A., Peeters, F., Lobbestael, J., & Huibers, M. J. (2018). Exploring mechanisms of change in schema therapy for chronic depression. Journal of Behavior Therapy and Experimental Psychiatry, 58, 97–105. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbtep.2017.10.002
- Revelle, W., & Condon, D. M. (2015). A model for personality at three levels. Journal of Research in Personality, 56, 70–81. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jrp.2014.12.006
- Roberts, B. W., & Donahue, E. M. (1994). One personality, multiple selves: Integrating personality and social roles. Journal of Personality, 62, 199–218. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-6494.1994.tb00291.x
- Sadikaj, G., Moskowitz, D. S., Russell, J. J., Zuroff, D. C., & Paris, J. (2013). Quarrelsome behavior in borderline personality disorder: Influence of behavioral and affective reactivity to perceptions of others. Journal of Abnormal Psychology, 122, 195–207. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0030871
- Schäflein, E., Sattel, H., Schmidt, U., & Sack, M. (2018). The enemy in the mirror: Self-perception-induced stress results in dissociation of psychological and physiological responses in patients with dissociative disorder. European Journal of Psychotraumatology, 9, 1472991. https://doi.org/10.1080/20008198.2018.1472991
- Sempértegui, G. A., Karreman, A., Arntz, A., & Bekker, M. H. J. (2014). Schema therapy for borderline personality disorder: A comprehensive review of its empirical foundations, effectiveness and implementation possibilities. Clinical Psychology Review, 33, 426–447. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cpr.2012.11.006
- Sened, H., Lazarus, G., Gleason, M. J., Rafaeli, E., & Fleeson, W. (2018). The use of intensive longitudinal methods in explanatory personality research. European Journal of Personality, 32, 269–285. https://doi.org/10.1002/per.2143
- Shahar, B. (2014). Emotion-focused therapy for the treatment of social anxiety: An overview of the model and a case description. Clinical Psychology & Psychotherapy, 21, 536–547. https://doi.org/10.1002/cpp.1853
- Shrout, P. E., & Lane, S. P. (2012). Psychometrics. In M. R. Mehl, & T. S. Conner (Eds.), Handbook of research methods for studying daily life (pp. 302–320). New York, NY: Guilford.
- Siegel, D. (2012). The developing mind, second edition: How relationships and the brain interact to shape who we are. New York, NY: Guilford Press.
10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199755059.001.0001 Google Scholar
- Sosnowska, J., Kuppens, P., De Fruyt, F., & Hofmans, J. (2019). A dynamic systems approach to personality: The Personality Dynamics (PersDyn) model. Personality and Individual Differences, 144, 11–18. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.paid.2019.02.013
- Spiegel, D., Loewenstein, R. J., Lewis-Fernández, R., Sar, V., Simeon, D., Vermetten, E., … Dell, P. F. (2011). Dissociative disorders in DSM-5. Depression and Anxiety, 28, 824–852. https://doi.org/10.1002/da.20874
- Stiles, W. B. (2006). Assimilation and the process of outcome: Introduction to a special section. Psychotherapy Research, 16, 389–392. https://doi.org/10.1080/10503300600735497
- Teasdale, J. D. (1997). The relationship between cognition and emotion: The mind-in-place in mood disorders. In D. M. Clark, & C. G. Fairburn (Eds.), Science and practice of cognitive behaviour therapy (pp. 67–94). Oxford, England: Oxford University Press.
- Vater, A., Schröder-Abé, M., Weißgerber, S., Roepke, S., & Schütz, A. (2015). Self-concept structure and borderline personality disorder: Evidence for negative compartmentalization. Journal of Behavior Therapy and Experimental Psychiatry, 46, 50–58. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbtep.2014.08.003
- Weger, U., Meyer, A., & Wagemann, J. (2016). Exploring the behavioral, experiential, and conceptual dimensions of the self. European Psychologist, 21, 180–194. https://doi.org/10.1027/1016-9040/a000263
- Wigman, J. T. W., Van Os, J., Borsboom, D., Wardenaar, K. J., Epskamp, S., Klippel, A., … Wichers, M. (2015). Exploring the underlying structure of mental disorders: Cross-diagnostic differences and similarities from a network perspective using both a top-down and a bottom-up approach. Psychological Medicine, 45, 2375–2387. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0033291715000331
- van Wijk-Herbrink, M. F., Roelofs, J., Broers, N. J., Rijkeboer, M. M., Arntz, A., & Bernstein, D. P. (2018). Validation of Schema Coping Inventory and Schema Mode Inventory in adolescents. Journal of Personality Disorders, 32, 220–241. https://doi.org/10.1521/pedi_2017_31_295
- Wilson, R. E., Harris, K., & Vazire, S. (2015). Personality and friendship satisfaction in daily life: Do everyday social interactions account for individual differences in friendship satisfaction? European Journal of Personality, 29, 173–186. https://doi.org/10.1002/per.1996
- Wilt, J., & Revelle, W. (2015). Affect, behaviour, cognition and desire in the Big Five: An analysis of item content and structure. European Journal of Personality, 29, 478–497. https://doi.org/10.1002/per.2002
- Wright, A. G. C., Gates, K. M., Arizmendi, C., Lane, S. T., Woods, W. C., & Edershile, E. A. (2019). Focusing personality assessment on the person: Modeling general, shared, and person specific processes in personality and psychopathology. Psychological Assessment, 31, 502–515. https://doi.org/10.1037/pas0000617
- Wright, A. G. C., & Simms, L. J. (2016). Stability and fluctuation of personality disorder features in daily life. Journal of Abnormal Psychology, 125, 641–656. https://doi.org/10.1037/abn0000169
- Wright, A. G., & Zimmermann, J. (2019). Applied ambulatory assessment: Integrating idiographic and nomothetic principles of measurement. Psychological Assessment, 31, 1467–1480. https://doi.org/10.1037/pas0000685
- Wylie, R. (1974). The self concept ( Rev. ed.), 1. Lincoln: University of Nebraska Press.
- Young, J. E., Klosko, J. S., & Weishaar, M. E. (2003). Schema therapy: A practitioner's guide. New York: Guilford.
- Zimmermann, J., Woods, W. C., Ritter, S., Happel, M., Masuhr, O., Jaeger, U., … Wright, A. G. (2019). Integrating structure and dynamics in personality assessment: First steps toward the development and validation of a Personality Dynamics Diary. Psychological Assessment., 31, 516–531. https://doi.org/10.31234/osf.io/5zcth
Citing Literature
Special Issue:New approaches towards conceptualizing and assessing personality
November/December 2020
Pages 1017-1036