Understanding Personality through Patterns of Daily Socializing: Applying Recurrence Quantification Analysis to Naturalistically Observed Intensive Longitudinal Social Interaction Data
Corresponding Author
Alexander F. Danvers
Department of Psychology, University of Arizona, Tucson, AZ, USA
Correspondence to: Alexander F. Danvers, University of Arizona, Tucson, AZ, USA.
E-mail: alexander.danvers@gmail.com
Search for more papers by this authorDavid A. Sbarra
Department of Psychology, University of Arizona, Tucson, AZ, USA
Search for more papers by this authorMatthias R. Mehl
Department of Psychology, University of Arizona, Tucson, AZ, USA
Search for more papers by this authorCorresponding Author
Alexander F. Danvers
Department of Psychology, University of Arizona, Tucson, AZ, USA
Correspondence to: Alexander F. Danvers, University of Arizona, Tucson, AZ, USA.
E-mail: alexander.danvers@gmail.com
Search for more papers by this authorDavid A. Sbarra
Department of Psychology, University of Arizona, Tucson, AZ, USA
Search for more papers by this authorMatthias R. Mehl
Department of Psychology, University of Arizona, Tucson, AZ, USA
Search for more papers by this authorAbstract
Ambulatory assessment methods provide a rich approach for studying daily behaviour. Too often, however, these data are analysed in terms of averages, neglecting patterning of this behaviour over time. This paper describes recurrence quantification analysis (RQA), a non-linear time series technique for analysing dynamic systems, as a method for analysing patterns of categorical, intensive longitudinal ambulatory assessment data. We apply RQA to objectively assessed social behaviour (e.g. talking to another person) coded from the Electronically Activated Recorder. Conceptual interpretations of RQA parameters, and an analysis of Electronically Activated Recorder data in adults going through a marital separation, are provided. Using machine learning techniques to avoid model overfitting, we find that adding RQA parameters to models that include just average amount of time spent talking (a static measure) improves prediction of four Big Five personality traits: extraversion, neuroticism, conscientiousness, and openness. Our strongest results suggest that a combination of average amount of time spent talking and four RQA parameters yield an R2 = .09 for neuroticism. Neuroticism is shown to be associated with shorter periods of extended conversation (periods of at least 12 minutes), demonstrating the utility of RQA to identify new relationships between personality and patterns of daily behaviour. Materials: https://osf.io/5nkr9/. © 2020 European Association of Personality Psychology
Open Research
Open Research Badges
This article earned Open Data badge through Open Practices Disclosure from the Center for Open Science: https://osf.io/tvyxz/wiki. The materials are permanently and openly accessible at https://osf.io/5nkr9/. Author's disclosure form may also be found at the Supporting Information in the online version.
Supporting Information
Filename | Description |
---|---|
per2282-sup-0001-Supplementary Materials.docxWord 2007 document , 14.8 KB |
Data S1. Supporting information |
per2282-sup-0001-Open_Practices_Disclosure_Form.pdfWord 2007 document , 647.5 KB | Supporting info item |
Please note: The publisher is not responsible for the content or functionality of any supporting information supplied by the authors. Any queries (other than missing content) should be directed to the corresponding author for the article.
References
- Allen, L. K., Likens, A. D., & McNamara, D. S. (2017, May). Recurrence quantification analysis: A technique for the dynamical analysis of student writing. In The Thirtieth International Flairs Conference.
- Baumeister, R. F., & Leary, M. R. (1995). The need to belong: Desire for interpersonal attachments as a fundamental human motivation. Psychological Bulletin, 117, 497–529. https://doi.org/10.1037/0033-2909.117.3.497
- Bourassa, K. J., Tackman, A. M., Mehl, M. R., & Sbarra, D. A. (2019). Psychological overinvolvement, emotional distress, and daily affect following marital dissolution. Collabra: Psychology, 5.
- Breil, S. M, Geukes, K, Wilson, R. E, Nestler, S, Vazire, S, & Back, M. D (2019). Zooming into real-life extraversion—How personality and situation shape sociability in social interactions. Collabra Psychology, 5(1), Article 7
10.1525/collabra.170 Google Scholar
- Chow, S. M., Ferrer, E., & Hsieh, F. (2011). Statistical methods for modeling human dynamics: An interdisciplinary dialogue. Routledge.
10.4324/9780203864746 Google Scholar
- Coco, M. I., & Dale, R. (2014). Cross-recurrence quantification analysis of categorical and continuous time series: An R package. Frontiers in Psychology, 5, 510.
- Dale, R., Warlaumont, A. S., & Richardson, D. C. (2011). Nominal cross recurrence as a generalized lag sequential analysis for behavioral streams. International Journal of Bifurcation and Chaos, 21, 1153–1161. https://doi.org/10.1142/S0218127411028970
- Danvers, A. F., Wundrack, R., & Mehl, M. R. (2020). (in press). Equilibria in personality states: A conceptual primer for dynamical analyses. European Journal of Personality.
- Dishion, T. J., & Snyder, J. (2004). An introduction to the special issue on advances in process and dynamic system analysis of social interaction and the development of antisocial behavior.
- Ferrer, E., Steele, J. S., & Hsieh, F. (2012). Analyzing the dynamics of affective dyadic interactions using patterns of intra-and interindividual variability. Multivariate Behavioral Research, 47, 136–171. https://doi.org/10.1080/00273171.2012.640605
- Fleeson, W., & Jayawickreme, E. (2015). Whole trait theory. Journal of Research in Personality, 56, 82–92. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jrp.2014.10.009
- Funder, D. C., & Ozer, D. J. (2019). Evaluating effect size in psychological research: Sense and nonsense. Advances in Methods and Practices in Psychological Science, 2(2), 156–168.
10.1177/2515245919847202 Google Scholar
- Gundogdu, D., Finnerty, A. N., Staiano, J., Teso, S., Passerini, A., Pianesi, F., & Lepri, B. (2017). Investigating the association between social interactions and personality states dynamics. Royal Society Open Science, 4, 170194. https://doi.org/10.1098/rsos.170194
- Hasselmo, K., Mehl, M. R., Tackman, A. M., Carey, A. L., Wertheimer, A. M., Stowe, R. P., & Sbarra, D. A. (2018). Objectively measured social integration is associated with an immune risk phenotype following marital separation. Annals of Behavioral Medicine, 52, 130–145. https://doi.org/10.1093/abm/kax034
- Hindman, M. (2015). Building better models: Prediction, replication, and machine learning in the social sciences. The Annals of the American Academy of Political and Social Science, 659, 48–62. https://doi.org/10.1177/0002716215570279
- Hollenstein, T. (2007). State space grids: Analyzing dynamics across development. International Journal of Behavioral Development, 31, 384–396. https://doi.org/10.1177/0165025407077765
- Hopwood, C. J., Zimmermann, J., Pincus, A. L., & Krueger, R. F. (2015). Connecting personality structure and dynamics: Towards a more evidence-based and clinically useful diagnostic scheme. Journal of Personality Disorders, 29, 431–448. https://doi.org/10.1521/pedi.2015.29.4.431
- John, O. P., & Srivastava, S. (1999). The Big Five trait taxonomy: History, measurement, and theoretical perspectives. Handbook of personality: Theory and research, 2, 102–138.
- Karoly, P. (1993). Mechanisms of self-regulation: A systems view. Annual Review of Psychology, 44, 23–52. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev.ps.44.020193.000323
- Lavictoire, L. A., Snyder, J., Stoolmiller, M., & Hollenstein, T. (2012). Affective dynamics in triadic peer interactions in early childhood. Nonlinear Dynamics, Psychology, and Life Sciences, 16, 293.
- Main, A., Paxton, A., & Dale, R. (2016). An exploratory analysis of emotion dynamics between mothers and adolescents during conflict discussions. Emotion, 16, 913–928. https://doi.org/10.1037/emo0000180
- McCabe, K. O., & Fleeson, W. (2016). Are traits useful? Explaining trait manifestations as tools in the pursuit of goals. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 110, 287–301. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0039490
- Mehl, M. R., Gosling, S. D., & Pennebaker, J. W. (2006). Personality in its natural habitat: Manifestations and implicit folk theories of personality in daily life. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 90, 862–877. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.90.5.862
- Milek, A., Butler, E. A., Tackman, A. M., Kaplan, D. M., Raison, C. L., Sbarra, D. A., … Mehl, M. R. (2018). “Eavesdropping on happiness” revisited: A pooled, multisample replication of the association between life satisfaction and observed daily conversation quantity and quality. Psychological Science, 29, 1451–1462. https://doi.org/10.1177/0956797618774252
- Mischel, W., & Shoda, Y. (1995). A cognitive-affective system theory of personality: Reconceptualizing situations, dispositions, dynamics, and invariance in personality structure. Psychological Review, 102, 246–268. https://doi.org/10.1037/0033-295X.102.2.246
- Mønster, D., Håkonsson, D. D., Eskildsen, J. K., & Wallot, S. (2016). Physiological evidence of interpersonal dynamics in a cooperative production task. Physiology & Behavior, 156, 24–34. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.physbeh.2016.01.004
- O’Hara, K. L., Grinberg, A. M, Tackman, A. M, Mehl, M. R., & Sbarra, D. A (2020). Contact With an Ex-Partner Is Associated With Psychological Distress After Marital Separation. Clinical Psychological Science, 2167702620916454
- O'Hara, K. L., Grinberg, A. M., Tackman, A. M., Mehl, M. R., & Sbarra, D. A. (in press). Contact with an ex-partner is associated with psychological distress after marital separation. Clinical Psychological Science.
- Read, S. J., Monroe, B. M., Brownstein, A. L., Yang, Y., Chopra, G., & Miller, L. C. (2010). A neural network model of the structure and dynamics of human personality. Psychological Review, 117, 61–92. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0018131
- Read, S. J., Smith, B. J., Droutman, V., & Miller, L. C. (2017). Virtual personalities: Using computational modeling to understand within-person variability. Journal of Research in Personality, 69, 237–249. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jrp.2016.10.005
- Richardson, D. C., Dale, R., & Kirkham, N. Z. (2007). The art of conversation is coordination. Psychological Science, 18, 407–413. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9280.2007.01914.x
- Richardson, M. J., Dale, R., & Marsh, K. L. (2014). Complex dynamical systems in social and personality psychology. Handbook of research methods in social and personality psychology, 253.
- Robinson, M. D., & Gordon, K. H. (2011). Personality dynamics: Insights from the personality social cognitive literature. Journal of Personality Assessment, 93, 161–176. https://doi.org/10.1080/00223891.2010.542534
- Rosen, P. J., Epstein, J. N., & Van Orden, G. (2013). I know it when I quantify it: Ecological momentary assessment and recurrence quantification analysis of emotion dysregulation in children with ADHD. ADHD Attention Deficit and Hyperactivity Disorders, 5, 283–294. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12402-013-0101-2
- Sbarra, D. A., & Ferrer, E. (2006). The structure and process of emotional experience following nonmarital relationship dissolution: Dynamic factor analyses of love, anger, and sadness. Emotion, 6, 224–238. https://doi.org/10.1037/1528-3542.6.2.224
- Schelling, T. C. (1998). Social mechanisms and social dynamics. Social mechanisms: An analytical approach to social theory, 32–44. https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511663901.002
10.1017/CBO9780511663901.002 Google Scholar
- Shannon, C. E. (1948). A mathematical model of communication. The Bell System Technical Journal, 27, 279–423.
10.1002/j.1538-7305.1948.tb01338.x Google Scholar
- Sherman, R. A, Rauthmann, J. F, Brown, N. A, Serfass, D. G, & Jones, A. B. (2015). The independent effects of personality and situations on real-time expressions of behavior and emotion. Journal of personality and social psychology, 109(5), 98–111.
- Shockley, K. (2005). Cross recurrence quantification of interpersonal postural activity. Tutorials in contemporary nonlinear methods for the behavioral sciences, 142–177.
- Sosnowska, J., Hofmans, J., & De Fruyt, F. (2019). Relating emotional arousal to work vigour: A dynamic systems perspective. Personality and Individual Differences, 136, 178–183. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.paid.2017.06.040
- Sosnowska, J., Kuppens, P., De Fruyt, F., & Hofmans, J. (2019). A dynamic systems approach to personality: The Personality Dynamics (PersDyn) model. Personality and Individual Differences, 144, 11–18. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.paid.2019.02.013
- Stachl, C, Au, Q, Schoedel, R, Gosling, S.D, Harari, G. M., Buschek, D., & … Bühner, M. (in press). Predicting Personality from Patterns of Behavior Collected with Smartphones. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America (PNAS). Preprint.. https://doi.org/10.31234/osf.io/ks4vd
- Sun, J., & Vazire, S. (2019). Do people know what they're like in the moment? Psychological Science, 30, 405–414. https://doi.org/10.1177/0956797618818476
- Tackman, A.M., Baranski, E.N., Sbarra, D.A., Raison, C.L., Moseley, S.A., Polsinelli, A.J., & Mehl, M.R. (under review). Personality in its natural habitat revisited: A pooled, multi-sample examination of the relationships between the Big Five personality traits and daily behavior and language.
- Vaidyanathan, P., Pelz, J., Alm, C., Shi, P., & Haake, A. (2014, March). Recurrence quantification analysis reveals eye-movement behavior differences between experts and novices. In Proceedings of the Symposium on Eye Tracking Research and Applications (pp. 303–306). ACM.
10.1145/2578153.2578207 Google Scholar
- Vallacher, R. R., Read, S. J., & Nowak, A. (2002). The dynamical perspective in personality and social psychology. Personality and Social Psychology Review, 6, 264–273. https://doi.org/10.1207/S15327957PSPR0604_01
- R. R. Vallacher, S. J. Read, & A. Nowak (Eds.). (2017). Computational social psychology. Routledge, DOI: https://doi.org/10.4324/9781315173726
10.4324/9781315173726 Google Scholar
- Wallot, S. (2018). Multidimensional cross-recurrence quantification analysis (MdCRQA)—A method for quantifying correlation between multivariate time-series. Multivariate Behavioral Research, 1–19.
- Wallot, S., Roepstorff, A., & Mønster, D. (2016). Multidimensional recurrence quantification analysis (MdRQA) for the analysis of multidimensional time-series: A software implementation in MATLAB and its application to group-level data in joint action. Frontiers in Psychology, 7, 1835.
- Wang, W., Harari, G. M., Wang, R., Müller, S. R., Mirjafari, S., Masaba, K., & Campbell, A. T. (2018). Sensing behavioral change over time: Using within-person variability features from mobile sensing to predict personality traits. Proceedings of the ACM on Interactive, Mobile, Wearable and Ubiquitous Technologies, 2(3), 141.
- Webber, C. L. Jr., & Zbilut, J. P. (2005). Recurrence quantification analysis of nonlinear dynamical systems. Tutorials in contemporary nonlinear methods for the behavioral sciences, 94, 26–94.
- Wright, A. G., Hopwood, C. J., & Simms, L. J. (2015). Daily interpersonal and affective dynamics in personality disorder. Journal of Personality Disorders, 29, 503–525. https://doi.org/10.1521/pedi.2015.29.4.503
- Yarkoni, T., & Westfall, J. (2017). Choosing prediction over explanation in psychology: Lessons from machine learning. Perspectives on Psychological Science, 12, 1100–1122. https://doi.org/10.1177/1745691617693393
- Zou, H., & Hastie, T. (2005). Regularization and variable selection via the elastic net. Journal of the Royal Statistical Society, Series B: Statistical Methodology, 67, 301–320. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9868.2005.00503.x
Special Issue:Behavioral personality science in the age of big data
September/October 2020
Pages 777-793