Volume 34, Issue 6 p. 1151-1174
Special Issue Article
Open DataOpen Material

An Adaptationist Framework for Personality Science

Aaron W. Lukaszewski

Corresponding Author

Aaron W. Lukaszewski

Department of Psychology, California State University, Fullerton, CA, USA

Correspondence to: Aaron W. Lukaszewski, Department of Psychology, California State University, Fullerton, CA, USA.

E-mail: aalukas.1859@gmail.com

Search for more papers by this author
David M.G. Lewis

David M.G. Lewis

School of Psychology and Exercise Science, Murdoch University, Perth, WA, Australia

Search for more papers by this author
Patrick K. Durkee

Patrick K. Durkee

Department of Psychology, University of Texas at Austin, Austin, TX, USA

Search for more papers by this author
Aaron N. Sell

Aaron N. Sell

Psychology and Criminology Department, Heidelberg University, Tiffin, OH, USA

Search for more papers by this author
Daniel Sznycer

Daniel Sznycer

Department of Psychology, University of Montreal, Montreal, QC, Canada

Search for more papers by this author
David M. Buss

David M. Buss

Department of Psychology, University of Texas at Austin, Austin, TX, USA

Search for more papers by this author
First published: 06 August 2020
Citations: 3

For their discussion or feedback on previous drafts of this manuscript, we thank Michael Barlev, David Condon, Leda Cosmides, Aaron Goetz, Cari Goetz, David Pietraszewski, Jim Roney, Thom Scott-Phillips, Anna Sedlecek, and John Tooby; the members of the Center for Evolutionary Psychology (UCSB) and Center for the Study of Human Nature (at Cal State Fullerton); and the participants in the 2018 EAPP/EAPA expert meeting at the University of Edinburgh.

Abstract

The field of personality psychology aspires to construct an overarching theory of human nature and individual differences: one that specifies the psychological mechanisms that underpin both universal and variable aspects of thought, emotion, and behaviour. Here, we argue that the adaptationist toolkit of evolutionary psychology provides a powerful meta-theory for characterizing the psychological mechanisms that give rise to within-person, between-person, and cross-cultural variations. We first outline a mechanism-centred adaptationist framework for personality science, which makes a clear ontological distinction between (i) psychological mechanisms designed to generate behavioural decisions and (ii) heuristic trait concepts that function to perceive, describe, and influence others behaviour and reputation in everyday life. We illustrate the utility of the adaptationist framework by reporting three empirical studies. Each study supports the hypothesis that the anger programme—a putative emotional adaptation—is a behaviour-regulating mechanism whose outputs are described in the parlance of the person description factor called ‘Agreeableness’. We conclude that the most productive way forward is to build theory-based models of specific psychological mechanisms, including their culturally evolved design features, until they constitute a comprehensive depiction of human nature and its multifaceted variations. © 2020 European Association of Personality Psychology

Open Research Badges

Open DataOpen Material

This article earned Open Data and Open Materials badges through Open Practices Disclosure from the Center for Open Science: https://osf.io/tvyxz/wiki. The data and materials are permanently and openly accessible at https://osf.io/evu2k/. Author's disclosure form may also be found at the Supporting Information in the online version.

The full text of this article hosted at iucr.org is unavailable due to technical difficulties.