Volume 49, Issue 2 p. 196-233
Original Article

When Do Foreign Institutional Blockholders Passively Promote Firm Innovation in a Local Market? Evidence from Korea

Denis Yongmin Joe

Denis Yongmin Joe

College of Global Business, Korea University, Republic of Korea

Search for more papers by this author
Chune Young Chung

Corresponding Author

Chune Young Chung

School of Business Administration, Chung-Ang University, Republic of Korea

Corresponding author: School of Business Administration, Chung-Ang University, 84 Heukseok-ro, Dongjak-gu, Seoul 06974, Republic of Korea. Tel: +82-2-820-5544, email: bizfinance@cau.ac.kr.

Search for more papers by this author
Justin Morscheck

Justin Morscheck

School of Business Administration, Gonzaga University, United States

Search for more papers by this author
First published: 23 March 2020
Citations: 7
This research was supported by the New Scholars Grant Program of the Korean Securities Association and Mirae Asset in 2019. The standard disclaimer applies, and all errors are our own.

Abstract

Using extensive hand-collected data on granted patents, we examine the effect of institutional blockholder monitoring on corporate innovation in Korea. Specifically, we focus on the relation between institutional blockholding and firm innovation. We find that institutional blockholders positively influence firm innovation and that this positive effect is driven primarily by foreign institutional blockholders, particularly when they engage in passive monitoring. The Korean market features limited participation by shareholders and pressure-sensitive domestic institutions. Thus, we demonstrate the importance of corporate governance for firm innovation in emerging markets, where corporate innovation is increasingly important for long-term economic growth, competitiveness, and value creation.

The full text of this article hosted at iucr.org is unavailable due to technical difficulties.