Volume 27, Issue 3 p. 216-223
ORIGINAL RESEARCH

Patterns of prostate-specific antigen testing by remoteness of residence and socio-economic status: An Australian population-based study

Ross J. S. Calopedos MD, BMed, BA, MS (Urol)

Corresponding Author

Ross J. S. Calopedos MD, BMed, BA, MS (Urol)

Cancer Research Division, Cancer Council NSW, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia

Gosford Hospital, Gosford, New South Wales, Australia

Correspondence

Dr. Ross J. S. Calopedos, Cancer Research Division, Cancer Council NSW, Sydney, NSW, Australia.

Email: r.calopedos@gmail.com

Search for more papers by this author
Albert Bang B.Comm M. Biostat

Albert Bang B.Comm M. Biostat

Cancer Research Division, Cancer Council NSW, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia

Search for more papers by this author
Peter Baade PhD

Peter Baade PhD

Cancer Research Centre, Cancer Council Queensland, Brisbane, Queensland, Australia

School of Mathematical Sciences, Queensland University of Technology, Brisbane, Queensland, Australia

Menzies Health Institute Queensland, Griffith University, Southport, Queensland, Australia

Search for more papers by this author
Xue Q. Yu PhD

Xue Q. Yu PhD

Cancer Research Division, Cancer Council NSW, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia

Sydney Medical School, The University of Sydney, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia

Search for more papers by this author
Stephen Ruthven MBBS, FRACS (Urol)

Stephen Ruthven MBBS, FRACS (Urol)

Gosford Hospital, Gosford, New South Wales, Australia

Search for more papers by this author
Manish I. Patel MBBS, MMed, PhD, FRACS (Urol)

Manish I. Patel MBBS, MMed, PhD, FRACS (Urol)

Discipline of Surgery, Sydney Medical School, The University of Sydney, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia

Department of Urology, Westmead Hospital, Westmead, New South Wales, Australia

Search for more papers by this author
David P. Smith MPH, PhD

David P. Smith MPH, PhD

Cancer Research Division, Cancer Council NSW, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia

Menzies Health Institute Queensland, Griffith University, Southport, Queensland, Australia

Sydney Medical School, The University of Sydney, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia

School of Public Health and Preventive Medicine, Monash University, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia

Search for more papers by this author
First published: 09 May 2019
Citations: 9

Abstract

Objective

Describes the variation in prostate cancer testing by the remoteness of residence and socio-economic status groups in Australia.

Design

A national population-based descriptive study using Medicare data extracted by the Department of Health (formerly the Department of Health and Ageing).

Setting

Australia.

Participants

All men, with a Medicare-reimbursed prostate-specific antigen test conducted in Australia between 2002 and 2017, were included. We focused on “screening and case finding” tests (Medicare Benefits Schedule item number 66655) from 1 April 2005 to 31 December 2009, to describe testing differences in subgroups. Groups were categorised into State and Territory, socio-economic status and region of residence. A negative binomial regression model was fitted to measure the incidence rate ratios of those who had a screening prostate-specific antigen test by group.

Main outcome measures

Age-standardised testing rates and incidence rate ratios.

Results

Between 2002 and 2017, 11 588 775 screening prostate-specific antigen tests were reimbursed by the Department of Human Services. During 2005-2009, 52% of all Australian men, aged 40 years and over, had a screening test. The incidence rate ratios differed by State and Territory. Men aged 40 years and over, living in very remote areas, were 43% less likely to have had a screening test than residents of major cities. Prostate-specific antigen testing rates fell in all age groups between 2007 and 2009 and 2017.

Conclusions

The prostate-specific antigen testing behaviour differs between community groups in Australia. Men were less likely to have had a screening prostate-specific antigen test the farther they lived from the major cities. This highlights the need for a more targeted approach to achieve an equitable and evidence-based prostate cancer care across all sectors of the community.

The full text of this article hosted at iucr.org is unavailable due to technical difficulties.