Volume 27, Issue 5 p. 398-404
ORIGINAL RESEARCH

Advance care planning in rural New South Wales from the perspective of general practice registrars and recently fellowed general practitioners

Jean Littlewood BMed

Corresponding Author

Jean Littlewood BMed

School of Public Health and Community Medicine, UNSW Medicine, UNSW, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia

Correspondence

Ms Jean Littlewood, Port Macquarie Rural Clinical School, University of New South Wales, 26 Highfields Circuit, Port Macquarie, NSW 2444, Australia.

Email: j.littlewood@student.unsw.edu.au

Search for more papers by this author
Reece Hinchcliff PhD

Reece Hinchcliff PhD

Centre for Health Services Management, University of Technology Sydney, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia

Queensland University of Technology, Brisbane, Queensland, Australia

Search for more papers by this author
Winston Lo BMed FRACGP

Winston Lo BMed FRACGP

Centre for Primary Health Care and Equity, UNSW, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia

School of Medicine, University of Western Sydney, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia

Search for more papers by this author
Joel Rhee MBBS(Hons) PhD FRACGP

Joel Rhee MBBS(Hons) PhD FRACGP

Centre for Primary Health Care and Equity, UNSW, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia

School of Medicine, University of Wollongong, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia

Search for more papers by this author
First published: 28 June 2019
Citations: 5

Abstract

Objective

This study examined advance care planning as delivered by general practice registrars and recently fellowed GPs in New South Wales rural settings. The facilitators and barriers to advance care planning uptake in these areas were investigated, as well as the state of general practice training on advance care planning.

Design

Qualitative descriptive methodology, involving semi-structured face-to-face and telephone interviews.

Setting

Primary care.

Participants

General practice registrars and recently fellowed GPs in New South Wales rural settings. Definition of rural using the Australian Standard Geographical Classification - Remoteness Area. Thirteen participants were included in the study.

Main outcome measures

Thematic analysis of interview transcripts elucidated key issues emerging from participants' accounts.

Results

Key barriers included doctor-dependent uptake, demands on doctor's time and the limited relevant resources available. Facilitators recognised were patient control in end-of-life care and long-standing relationships between GPs and their patients. Uptake among patients was low, and minimal training on advance care planning reported.

Conclusion

The lack of training opportunities in advance care planning during vocational training, especially when combined with the essential role played by rural GPs in initiating advance care planning and providing end-of-life care, appears to be a major problem that might contribute to poor uptake among patients in rural areas. This study demonstrated, however, the significant benefits that advance care planning could bring in patients living in rural communities if delivered effectively. Given that rural GPs face a number of barriers to providing routine health care, these results highlight an important need to provide GPs and rural communities with support, education, incentive, better administrative tools, options and greater awareness of advance care planning.

The full text of this article hosted at iucr.org is unavailable due to technical difficulties.