Volume 27, Issue 4 p. 351-357
SPECIAL ISSUE ARTICLE

Reviewing the extent of rural and remote considerations in elder abuse policy: A scoping review

Barbara Blundell BSW Hons, PhD

Corresponding Author

Barbara Blundell BSW Hons, PhD

School of Occupational Therapy, Social Work and Speech Pathology, Curtin University, Perth, Western Australia, Australia

Correspondence

Barbara Blundell, School of Occupational Therapy, Social Work and Speech Pathology, Curtin University, GPO Box U1987, Perth, WA 6845, Australia.

Email: barbara.blundell@curtin.edu.au

Search for more papers by this author
Amy Warren BSW Hons

Amy Warren BSW Hons

School of Occupational Therapy, Social Work and Speech Pathology, Curtin University, Perth, Western Australia, Australia

Search for more papers by this author
First published: 19 August 2019
Citations: 4

Abstract

Objective

To identify national and international research and literature focussed on policy responses to elder abuse in rural and remote communities to generate recommendations for Australian responses.

Design

Scoping literature review.

Setting

Australia (some international policy also included).

Participants

National and international elder abuse policy documents relating to rural and remote responses were reviewed. Seventy-two stakeholders were invited to contribute literature that may have been missed in the scoping review.

Main outcome measure(s)

Identification of the extent to which issues for rural and remote communities were discussed in elder abuse policy.

Result

Of the 13 Australian policy documents reviewed, only four made mention of rural and remote communities, though this was generally only in regard to increase in vulnerability. No mention of these communities were identified in reviewed global policy. One document focussing on abuse in rural and remote Indigenous communities highlighted the importance of developing culturally appropriate responses hinged on community collaboration and consultation.

Conclusion

Consideration of rural and remote communities in elder abuse policy is generally not meaningful. It is recommended that future policy development includes recognition of the distinct features of elder abuse in rural and remote communities, as well as how these features may impact on prevention and responses in these locations. These features include geographical isolation, lack of access to services and transportation, confidentiality and privacy issues, and the need for culturally sensitive approaches to address elder abuse for Indigenous people which take into account the impact of historical disenfranchisement.

CONFLICT OF INTEREST

The authors have no competing interests in the conduct of this systematic review or the preparation of this manuscript.

The full text of this article hosted at iucr.org is unavailable due to technical difficulties.