Main Article
Institutional bricolage in payment for ecosystem services: Insights from the Sloping Land Conversion Programme in upland communities, Southwest China
Jun He,
Corresponding Author
Jun He
National Centre for Borderland Ethnic Studies in Southwest China, Yunnan University, Kunming, 650091 China
School of Ethnology and Sociology, Yunnan University, Kunming, 650091 China
Search for more papers by this authorJun He,
Corresponding Author
Jun He
National Centre for Borderland Ethnic Studies in Southwest China, Yunnan University, Kunming, 650091 China
School of Ethnology and Sociology, Yunnan University, Kunming, 650091 China
Search for more papers by this authorAbstract
Global discussion of payment for ecosystem services (PES) has moved beyond the simple notion of effecting environmental and livelihood improvement for participants. Changes in the local governance following the introduction of PES have become a focus as it may affect the local incentive for sustainable natural resource management. Although there has been increasing attention on the interplay between different institutions in shaping PES outcomes, the institutional outcomes resulting from these interactions and the understandings of local institutional dynamics are limited. Drawing on in-depth case studies from Southwest China, this research uses an institutional bricolage framework to examine how pre-existing and informal local institutions interacted with a newly introduced and formal PES programme – the Chinese Sloping Land Conversion Programme. It reveals that institutional bricolage processes can lead to positive ecological and socioeconomic outcomes when hybrid institutions were built to fit the local socio-ecological contexts. The policy implication from this research calls for decentralisation reforms and provision of institutional flexibility. This would allow bricolage processes to foster adaptive governance in the implementation of PES programmes.
References
- Ahrends, A., P.M. Hollingsworth, P. Beckschäfer et al. (2017) China's fight to halt tree cover loss, Proceedings of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences 284(1854): 20162559.
- Bennett, M.T. (2008) China's Sloping Land Conversion Program: Institutional innovation or business as usual? Ecological Economics 65(4): 699–711.
- Bennett, M.T., C. Xie, N.J. Hogarth, D. Peng and L. Putzel (2014) China's conversion of cropland to forest program for household delivery of ecosystem services: How important is a local implementation regime to survival rate outcomes? Forests 5(9): 2345–2376.
- Bryan, B.A., L. Gao, Y. Ye et al. (2018) China's response to a national land-system sustainability emergency, Nature 559(7713): 193–204.
- Bryman, A. (2015) Social research methods, 5th edn. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
- Chambers, R. (1994) The origins and practice of participatory rural appraisal, World Development 22(7): 953–969.
- Cleaver, F. (2002) Reinventing institutions: Bricolage and the social embeddedness of natural resource management, The European Journal of Development Research 14(2): 11–30.
10.1080/714000425 Google Scholar
- Cleaver, F. (2012) Development through bricolage: Rethinking institutions for natural resource management, New York, NY: Routledge.
- Cleaver, F. and J. De Koning (2015) Furthering critical institutionalism, International Journal of the Commons 9(1): 1–18.
- Cleaver, F. and L. Whaley (2018) Understanding process, power, and meaning in adaptive governance: A critical institutional reading, Ecology and Society 23(2): 49. https://doi.org/10.5751/ES-10212-230249
- Corbera, E., C.G. Soberanis and K. Brown (2009) Institutional dimensions of payments for ecosystem services: An analysis of Mexico's carbon forestry programme, Ecological Economics 68(3): 743–761.
- Engel, S., S. Pagiola and S. Wunder (2008) Designing payments for environmental services in theory and practice: An overview of the issues, Ecological Economics 65(4): 663–674.
- Faggin, J.M. and J.H. Behagel (2018) Institutional bricolage of sustainable forest management implementation in rural settlements in Caatinga biome, Brazil, International Journal of the Commons 12(2): 275–299.
- Fauzi, A. and Z. Anna (2013) The complexity of the institution of payment for environmental services: A case study of two Indonesian PES schemes, Ecosystem Services 6: 54–63.
- Frick-Trzebitzky, F. (2017) Crafting adaptive capacity: Institutional bricolage in adaptation to urban flooding in Greater Accra, Water Alternatives 10(2): 625.
- Frick-Trzebitzky, F., R. Baghel and A. Bruns (2017) Institutional bricolage and the production of vulnerability to floods in an urbanising delta in Accra, International Journal of Disaster Risk Reduction 26: 57–68.
- Gorenflo, L.J., S. Romaine, R.A. Mittermeier and K. Walker-Painemilla (2012) Co-occurrence of linguistic and biological diversity in biodiversity hotspots and high biodiversity wilderness areas, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences 109(21): 8032–8037.
- Gross-Camp, N.D., A. Martin, S. McGuire, B. Kebede and J. Munyarukaza (2012) Payments for ecosystem services in an African protected area: Exploring issues of legitimacy, fairness, equity and effectiveness, Oryx 46(01): 24–33.
- Hassenforder, E., N. Ferrand, J. Pittock, K.A. Daniell and O. Barreteau (2015) A participatory planning process as an arena for facilitating institutional bricolage: Example from the Rwenzori region, Uganda, Society & Natural Resources 28(9): 995–1012.
- He, J. (2014) Governing forest restoration: Local case studies of sloping land conversion program in Southwest China, Forest Policy and Economics 46: 30–38.
- He, J. (2020) Situated payments for ecosystem services: Local agencies in the implementation of the sloping land conversion programme in Southwest China, Development and Change 51(1): 73–93.
- He, J., H. Yang, R. Jamnadass, J. Xu, and Y. Yang (2012) Decentralization of tree seedling supply systems for afforestation in the west of Yunnan Province, China. Small-scale Forestry 11(2): 147–166.
- He, J. and R. Lang (2015) Limits of state-led programs of payment for ecosystem services: Field evidence from the sloping land conversion program in Southwest China, Human Ecology 43(5): 749–758.
- He, J. and T. Sikor (2015) Notions of justice in payments for ecosystem services: Insights from China's sloping land conversion program in Yunnan Province, Land Use Policy 43: 207–216.
- He, J. and T. Sikor (2017) Looking beyond tenure in China's collective forest tenure reform: Insight from Yunnan Province, Southwest China, International Forestry Review 19(1): 29–41.
- He, J., Z. Zhou, H. Weyerhaeuser and J. Xu (2009) Participatory technology development for incorporating non-timber forest products into forest restoration in Yunnan, Southwest China, Forest Ecology and Management 257(10): 2010–2016.
- He, J., R. Lang and J. Xu (2014) Local dynamics driving forest transition: Insights from upland villages in Southwest China, Forests 5(2): 214–233.
- Ishihara, H., U. Pascual and I. Hodge (2017) Dancing with storks: The role of power relations in payments for ecosystem services, Ecological Economics 139: 45–54.
- Jones, S.D. (2015) Bridging political economy analysis and critical institutionalism: An approach to help analyse institutional change for rural water services, International Journal of the Commons 9(1): 65–86.
- Kolinjivadi, V., J. Adamowski and N. Kosoy (2014) Recasting payments for ecosystem services (PES) in water resource management: A novel institutional approach, Ecosystem Services 10: 144–154.
- Lin, Y. and S. Yao (2014) Impact of the sloping land conversion program on rural household income: An integrated estimation, Land Use Policy 40: 56–63.
- Liu, C., J. Lu and R. Yin (2010) An estimation of the effects of China's priority forestry programs on farmers' income, Environmental Management 45(3): 526–540.
- Lu, G. and R. Yin (2020) Evaluating the evaluated socioeconomic impacts of China's sloping land conversion program, Ecological Economics 177: 106785.
- Martin, A., N. Gross-Camp, B. Kebede and S. McGuire (2014) Measuring effectiveness, efficiency and equity in an experimental payments for ecosystem services trial, Global Environmental Change 28: 216–226.
- Milne, S. and B. Adams (2012) Market masquerades: Uncovering the politics of community-level payments for environmental services in Cambodia, Development and Change 43(1): 133–158.
- Muradian, R., M. Arsel, L. Pellegrini et al. (2013) Payments for ecosystem services and the fatal attraction of win-win solutions, Conservation Letters 6(4): 274–279.
- van Noordwijk, M., B. Leimona, R. Jindal et al. (2012) Payments for environmental services: Evolution toward efficient and fair incentives for multifunctional landscapes, Annual Review of Environment and Resources 37(1): 389–420.
- North, D.C. (1990) Institutions, institutional change and economic performance, New York, NY: Cambridge University Press.
10.1017/CBO9780511808678 Google Scholar
- Ostrom, E. (2009) Understanding institutional diversity, Princeton: Princeton University Press.
10.2307/j.ctt7s7wm Google Scholar
- Pattanayak, S.K., S. Wunder and P.J. Ferraro (2010) Show me the money: Do payments supply environmental services in developing countries? Review of Environmental Economics and Policy 4(2): 254–274.
- Persson, M., J. Moberg, M. Ostwald and J. Xu (2013) The Chinese grain for green programme: Assessing the carbon sequestered via land reform, Journal of Environmental Management 126: 142–146.
- Phelps, J., E.L. Webb and A. Agrawal (2010) Does REDD+ threaten to recentralize forest governance? Science 328(5976): 312–313.
- Ren, L., J. Li, S. Li, C. Li and G.C. Daily (2020) Does China's major payment for ecosystem services program meet the ‘gold criteria’? Targeting strategies of different decision-makers, Journal of Cleaner Production 275: 122667.
- Sakketa, T.G. (2018) Institutional bricolage as a new perspective to analyse institutions of communal irrigation: Implications towards meeting the water needs of the poor communities, World Development Perspectives 9: 1–11.
10.1016/j.wdp.2017.11.003 Google Scholar
- Shapiro-Garza, E., P. McElwee, G. Van Hecken and E. Corbera (2020) Beyond market logics: Payments for ecosystem services as alternative development practices in the global south, Development and Change 51(1): 3–25.
- Sikor, T. and H. Cầm (2016) REDD+ on the rocks? Conflict over forest and politics of justice in Vietnam, Human Ecology 44(2): 217–227.
- State Forestry Administration (2002) Improving implementation of the sloping land conservation program. Policy Document by State Forestry Administration. Beijing: State Forestry Administration.
- State Forestry Administration (2018) 2017 China forestry development report. Beijing: China Forestry Publishing House.
- Steenbergen, D. J., and C. Warren (2018) Implementing strategies to overcome social-ecological traps: the role of community brokers and institutional bricolage in a locally managed marine area. Ecology and Society 23(3): 10. https://doi.org/10.5751/ES-10256-230310
- Vatn, A. (2010) An institutional analysis of payments for environmental services, Ecological Economics 69(6): 1245–1252.
- Wang, R.Y., T. Liu and H. Dang (2018) Bridging critical institutionalism and fragmented authoritarianism in China: An analysis of centralized water policies and their local implementation in semi-arid irrigation districts, Regulation & Governance 12(4): 451–465.
- Wang, J.H.Z., R. Fisher and J. Connell (2019) Participatory natural resource management in rural China: Making and unmaking environmental narratives, Asia Pacific Viewpoint 60(2): 205–219.
- Woodhouse, E. (2015) Local experiences and contested meanings of the Chinese ‘grain for green’ land conversion programme in an agro-pastoralist Tibetan community, Nomadic Peoples 19(2): 281–302.
- Wunder, S. (2008) Payments for environmental services and the poor: Concepts and preliminary evidence, Environment and Development Economics 13(3): 279–297.
- Wunder, S., R. Brouwer, S. Engel et al. (2018) From principles to practice in paying for nature's services, Nature Sustainability 1(3): 145–150.
- Xu, Z.G., M.T. Bennett, R. Tao and J.T. Xu (2004) China's sloping land conversion programme four years on: Current situation and pending issues, International Forestry Review 6: 317–326.
- Yin, R. and G. Yin (2010) China's primary programs of terrestrial ecosystem restoration: Initiation, implementation, and challenges, Environmental Management 45(3): 429–441.
- Yin, R., M. Zhao and S. Yao (2014) Designing and implementing payments for ecosystem services programs: What lessons can be learned from China's experience of restoring degraded cropland? Environmental Science and Technology 48(1): 19–20.
- Yu, X. (2016) Central–local conflicts in China's environmental policy implementation: The case of the sloping land conversion program, Natural Hazards 84(1): 77–96.
- Zinda, J.A., C.J. Trac, D. Zhai and S. Harrell (2017) Dual-function forests in the returning farmland to forest program and the flexibility of environmental policy in China, Geoforum 78: 119–132.
