Volume 37, Issue 1 p. 138-144
ORIGINAL ARTICLE

Effect of acute angle model on mouthguard thickness with the thermoforming method and moving the model position just before fabrication

Mutsumi Takahashi

Corresponding Author

Mutsumi Takahashi

Department of Physiology, The Nippon Dental University School of Life Dentistry at Niigata, Niigata, Japan

Correspondence

Mutsumi Takahashi, Department of Physiology, The Nippon Dental University School of Life Dentistry at Niigata, 1-8, Hamaura-cho, Chuo-ku, Niigata City, Niigata, 951-8580, Japan.

Email: mutsumit@ngt.ndu.ac.jp

Search for more papers by this author
Yogetsu Bando

Yogetsu Bando

BANDO Dental Clinic, Ishikawa, Japan

Search for more papers by this author
First published: 19 August 2020
Citations: 7

Abstract

Background/Aim

The effectiveness and safety of mouthguards are affected by their thickness. The aim of this study was to investigate the effect of an acute angle model on the mouthguard thickness with the thermoforming method in which the model position was moved just before fabrication.

Materials and Methods

Mouthguards were thermoformed using 4.0 mm thick ethylene vinyl acetate sheets and a vacuum forming machine. Three hard plaster models were prepared: 1) the angle of the labial surface to the model base was 90°, and the anterior height was 25 mm (model A); 2) the angle was 90°, and the anterior height was 30 mm (model B); and 3) the angle was 80°, and the anterior height was 30 mm (model C). The sheet was softened until it sagged 15 mm, after which the sheet frame was lowered to cover the model. The model was then pushed from behind to move it forward, and the vacuum was switched on (MP). The model was moved 20 mm whereas a control model was not moved. Mouthguard thickness was measured using a specialized caliper. The differences in mouthguard thicknesses due to model forms and forming conditions were analyzed by two-way ANOVA and Bonferroni's multiple comparison tests. Results: The MP tended to be thicker than the control in all models. In the controls, model C was significantly thicker than models A and B at the labial and buccal surfaces. In MP, model A was significantly thicker than models B and C on the labial surface. On the labial and buccal surfaces in MP, model C was significantly thicker than model B.

Conclusions

This study suggested that in the thermoforming method in which the model position was moved just before fabrication, reducing the height was more effective than changing the angle of the model to ensure the appropriate thickness.

CONFLICT OF INTEREST

The authors confirm that they have no conflict of interest.

The full text of this article hosted at iucr.org is unavailable due to technical difficulties.