Volume 56, Issue 1 p. 5-28
ORIGINAL ARTICLE

Independent director compensation, corruption, and monitoring

Natasha Burns

Natasha Burns

Department of Finance, University of Texas at San Antonio, San Antonio, Texas, USA

Search for more papers by this author
Anna Kapalczynski

Anna Kapalczynski

School of Business and Leadership, University of Puget Sound, Tacoma, Washington, USA

Search for more papers by this author
John K. Wald

Corresponding Author

John K. Wald

Department of Finance, University of Texas at San Antonio, San Antonio, Texas, USA

Correspondence

John K. Wald, Department of Finance, UTSA, One UTSA Circle, San Antonio, TX 78249, USA.

Email: john.wald@utsa.edu

Search for more papers by this author
First published: 18 June 2020
Citations: 9

Abstract

We find that independent directors in more corrupt countries receive greater pay. This relation could reflect outside directors in corrupt countries expropriating firm value, or it could reflect higher compensation for the additional effort required to lessen the negative effects of corruption. Acquirer acquisition announcement returns are lower in more corrupt countries, and this relation is mitigated by higher director pay. Higher director pay is also associated with greater sensitivity of CEO turnover to firm performance and moderates the negative effects of country-level corruption on firm value. This evidence is consistent with higher director pay in corrupt countries incentivizing effort.

The full text of this article hosted at iucr.org is unavailable due to technical difficulties.