How do independent directors view corporate social responsibility (CSR)? Evidence from a quasi-natural experiment
Pandej Chintrakarn
Business Administration Division, Mahidol University International College (MUIC), Nakhon Pathom, Thailand
Search for more papers by this authorPornsit Jiraporn
School of Graduate Professional Studies, Pennsylvania State University, Malvern, Pennsylvania
Search for more papers by this authorCorresponding Author
Shenghui Tong
School of Business, Siena College, Loudonville, New York
Correspondence
Shenghui Tong, Siena College, Loudonville, 515 Loudon Road, Loudonville NY 12211.
Email: tongshenghui@yahoo.com
Search for more papers by this authorNapatsorn Jiraporn
School of Business, State University of New York at Oswego, Oswego, New York
Search for more papers by this authorRichard Proctor
School of Business, Siena College, Loudonville, New York
Search for more papers by this authorPandej Chintrakarn
Business Administration Division, Mahidol University International College (MUIC), Nakhon Pathom, Thailand
Search for more papers by this authorPornsit Jiraporn
School of Graduate Professional Studies, Pennsylvania State University, Malvern, Pennsylvania
Search for more papers by this authorCorresponding Author
Shenghui Tong
School of Business, Siena College, Loudonville, New York
Correspondence
Shenghui Tong, Siena College, Loudonville, 515 Loudon Road, Loudonville NY 12211.
Email: tongshenghui@yahoo.com
Search for more papers by this authorNapatsorn Jiraporn
School of Business, State University of New York at Oswego, Oswego, New York
Search for more papers by this authorRichard Proctor
School of Business, Siena College, Loudonville, New York
Search for more papers by this authorPart of this research was carried out while Pornsit Jiraporn served as a visiting scholar at The National Institute of Development Administration (NIDA) and at SASIN Graduate Institute of Business Administration, Chulalongkorn University in Bangkok, Thailand.
The Supporting Information can be found at the journal website at https://financialreview.poole.ncsu.edu.
Abstract
We investigate how independent directors view corporate social responsibility (CSR). Exploiting the passage of the Sarbanes-Oxley (SOX) Act and the associated exchange listing requirements as an exogenous regulatory shock, we document that independent directors view CSR activities unfavorably. In particular, firms forced to raise board independence reduce CSR engagement significantly relative to those not required to increase board independence. Our results are consistent with the risk-mitigation view and the agency cost hypothesis where managers over-invest in CSR to mitigate their own exposure to nonsystematic risk. The over-investments in CSR are curbed in the presence of a stronger, more independent, board of directors. Several robustness checks confirm the results, including fixed-effects and random-effects regressions, dynamic panel data analysis, instrumental-variable analysis, propensity score matching, Lewbel's heteroscedastic identification, and Oster's method for coefficient stability. We also confirm the risk-mitigation hypothesis by showing that CSR activities reduce firm risk significantly. Our research design is much less vulnerable to endogeneity and is therefore likely to show a causal effect of board independence on CSR.
Supporting Information
Filename | Description |
---|---|
fire12244-sup-0001-Appendixes.docx69 KB | SUPPORTING INFORMATION |
Please note: The publisher is not responsible for the content or functionality of any supporting information supplied by the authors. Any queries (other than missing content) should be directed to the corresponding author for the article.
REFERENCES
- Adhikari, B. (2016). Causal effect of analyst following on corporate social responsibility. Journal of Corporate Finance, 41, 201–216.
- Amihud, Y., & Lev, B. (1981). Risk reduction as a managerial motive by conglomerate managers. Bell Journal of Economics, 12, 605–617.
- Barnea, A., & Rubin, A. (2010). Corporate social responsibility as a conflict between shareholders. Journal of Business Ethics, 97, 71–86.
- Baron, D. P., Harjoto, M. A., & Jo, H. (2011). The economics and politics of corporate social performance. Business and Politics, 13, 1–46.
10.2202/1469-3569.1374 Google Scholar
- Beurden, P. V., & Gosslingm, T. (2008). The worth of values —A literature review on the relation between corporate social and financial performance. Journal of Business Ethics, 82, 407–424.
- Bhandari, A., & Javakhadze, D. (2017). Corporate social responsibility and capital allocation efficiency. Journal of Corporate Finance, 43, 354–377.
- Borghesi, R., Houston, J., & Naranjo, H. (2014). Corporate socially responsible investments: CEO altruism, reputation, and shareholder interests. Journal of Corporate Finance, 26, 164–181.
- Carroll, A. B. (1991). The pyramid of corporate social responsibility: Toward the moral management of organizational stakeholders. Business Horizons, https://doi.org/10.1016/0007-6813(91)90005-G.
10.1016/0007-6813(91)90005-G Google Scholar
- Cespa, G., & Cestone, G. (2007). Corporate social responsibility and managerial entrenchment. Journal of Economics and Management Strategy, 16, 741–771.
- Chintrakarn, P., Jiraporn, P., Jiraporn, N., & Davidson, T. (2017). Estimating the effect of corporate social responsibility on firm value using geographic identification. Asia-Pacific Journal of Financial Studies, 46, 276–304.
- Chintrakarn, P., Jiraporn, P., Kim, Y. S., & Kim, J. C. (2015). Does corporate governance quality affect analyst coverage? Evidence from the Institutional Shareholder Services (ISS). Applied Economics Letters, 22, 312–317.
- Chintrakarn, P., Jiraporn, P., Kim, Y. S., & Kim, J. C. (2016). The effect of corporate governance on corporate social responsibility. Asia-Pacific Journal of Financial Studies, 45, 102–123.
- Chhaochharia, V., & Grinstein, Y. (2009). CEO compensation and board structure. Journal of Finance, 64, 231–261.
- Deng, X., Kang, J. K., & Low, B. S. (2013). Corporate social responsibility and stakeholder value maximization: Evidence from mergers. Journal of Financial Economics, 110, 87–109.
- Engel, E., Hayes, R., & Wang, X. (2007). The Sarbanes-Oxley act and firms’ going private decisions. Journal of Accounting and Economics, 44, 116–145.
- Fama, E. (1980). Agency problems and the theory of the firm. Journal of Political Economy, 88, 288–307.
- Garcia-Castro, R., Arino, M. A., & Canela, M. A. (2010). Does social performance really lead to financial performance? Accounting for endogeneity. Journal of Business Ethics, 92, 107–126.
- Gardberg, N. A., & Fombrun, C. (2006). Corporate citizenship: Creating intangible assets across institutional environment. Academy of Management Review, 31, 329–346.
- Godfrey, P. C. (2005). The relationship between corporate philanthropy and shareholder wealth: A risk management perspective. Academy of Management Review, 30, 777–798.
- Godfrey, P. C., Merrill, C. B., & Hansen, J. M. (2009). The relationship between corporate social responsibility and shareholder value: An empirical test of the risk management hypothesis. Strategic Management Journal, 30, 425–445.
- Gompers, P., Ishii, J., & Metrick, A. (2003). Corporate governance and equity prices. Quarterly Journal of Economics, 118, 107–155.
- Gormley, T.&A. and Matsa, D. (2014). Common errors: How to (and not to) control for unobserved heterogeneity. Review of Financial Studies, 27, 617–661.
- Goss, A., & Roberts, G. (2011). The impact of corporate social responsibility on the cost of bank loans. Journal of Banking & Finance, 35, 1794–1810.
- Guo, L., Lach, P., & Mobbs, S. (2015). Tradeoffs between internal and external governance: Evidence from exogenous regulatory shocks. Financial Management, , 44, 81–114.
- Guo, L., & Masulis, R. (2014). Board structure and monitoring: New evidence from CEO turnovers. Working paper, University of New South Wales.
- Guthrie, K., Sokolowsky, J., & Wan, K. (2012). CEO compensation and board structure revisited. Journal of Finance, 67, 1149–1168.
- Jamali, D., Safieddine, A. M., & Rabbath, M. (2008). Corporate governance and corporate social responsibility synergies and interrelationships. Corporate Governance: An International Review, 16, 443–459.
- Jensen, M. C. (2011). Value maximization, stakeholder theory, and the corporate objective function. Journal of Applied Corporate Finance, 14, 8–21.
10.1111/j.1745-6622.2001.tb00434.x Google Scholar
- Jha, A., & Cox, J. (2015). Corporate social responsibility and social capital. Journal of Banking and Finance, 60, 252–270.
- Jiraporn, P., & Chintrakarn, P. (2013). How do powerful CEOs view corporate social responsibility (CSR)? An empirical note. Economics Letters, 119, 344–347.
- Jiraporn, P., Chintrakarn, P., Tong, S., & Treepongkaruna, S. (2018). Does board independence substitute for external audit quality? Evidence from an exogenous regulatory shock. Australian Journal of Management, 43, 27–41.
- Jiraporn, P., Jiraporn, N., Boeprasert, A., & Chang, K. (2014). Does corporate social responsibility (CSR) improve credit ratings? Evidence from geographic identification. Financial Management, 43, 505–531.
- Jiraporn, P., & Nimmanunta, K. (2018). Estimating the effect of board independence on managerial ownership using a quasi-natural experiment. Applied Economics Letters, 25, 1237–1243.
- Jo, H., & Harjoto, M. A. (2011). Corporate governance and firm value: The impact of corporate social responsibility. Journal of Business Ethics, 103, 351–383.
- Jo, H., & Harjoto, M. A. (2012). The causal effect of corporate governance on corporate social responsibility. Journal of Business Ethics, 106, 53–72.
- Kamar, E., Karaca-Mandic, P., & Talley, E. (2009). Going-private decisions and the Sarbanes-Oxley act of 2002: A cross-country analysis. Journal of Law, Economics, and Organizations, 25, 107–133.
- Knyazeva, A., Knyaxeva, D., & Masulis, R. W. (2013). The supply of corporate directors and board independence. Review of Financial Studies, 26, 1561–1605.
- Linck, J., Netter, J., & Yang, T. (2009). The effects and unintended consequences of the Sarbanes-Oxley act on the supply and demand for directors. Review of Financial Studies, 22, 3287–3328.
- Leuz, C., Triantis, A., & Wang, T. (2008). Why do firms go dark? Causes and economic consequences of voluntary SEC deregistrations. Journal of Accounting and Economics, 45, 181–208.
- Lewbel, A. (2012). Using heteroscedasticity to identify and estimate mismeasured and endogenous regressor models. Journal of Business &Economic Statistics, 30, 67–80.
- Margolis, J. D., & Walsh, J. P. (2003). Misery loves companies: Rethinking social initiatives by business. Administrative Science Quarterly, 48, 268–305.
- McGuire, J., Sundgren, A., & Schneeweis, T. (1988). Corporate social responsibility and firm financial performance. Academy of Management Journal, 31, 854–872.
- Nofsinger, J. R., Sulaeman, J., & Varma, A. (2019). Institutional investors and corporate social responsibility. Journal of Corporate Finance, 58, 700–725.
- Oh, W. Y., Chang, Y. K., & Martynov, A. (2011). The effect of ownership structure on corporate social responsibility: Empirical evidence from Korea. Journal of Business Ethics, 104, 283–297.
- Onsakul, V., & Jiraporn, P. (2019). How do independent directors view powerful executive risk-taking incentives? A quasi-natural experiment. Finance Research Letters, 31, 463–470.
- Oster, E. (2017). Unobservable selection and coefficient stability: Theory and evidence, Journal of Business and Economic Statistics, 37, 187–204
- Peters, R. H., & Taylor, L. (2017). Intangible capital and the investment-q relation. Journal of Financial Economics, 123, 251–272.
- Piotroski, J., & Srinivasan, S. (2008). Regulation and bonding: The Sarbanes-Oxley act and the flow of international listings. Journal of Accounting Research, 46, 383–425.
- Scherer, A. G., & Palazzo, G. (2007). Toward a political conception of corporate responsibility: Business and society seen from a Habermasian perspective. Academy of Management Review, 32, 1096–1120.
- Starks, L. T. (2009). Corporate governance and corporate social responsibility: What do investors care about? What should investors care about? The Financial Review, 44, 461–468.
10.1111/j.1540-6288.2009.00225.x Google Scholar
- Surroca, J., & Tribo, J. A. (2008). Managerial entrenchment and corporate social performance. Journal of Business, Finance, and Accounting, 35, 748–789.
- Waddock, S. A., & Graves, S. B. (1997). The corporate social performance-financial performance link. Strategic Management Journal, 18(4), 303–319.
- Withisuphakorn, P., & Jiraporn, P. (2018). Deciphering the motives behind corporate social responsibility using managerial ownership: Evidence from heteroskedastic identification. Working paper, Pennsylvania State University, School of Graduate Professional Studies.