Staging environmental risk: a methodological cosmopolitanism approach to Chinese media events
Corresponding Author
ZHIFEI MAO
Shenzhen University, School of Media and Communication
Shenzhen University, School of Media and Communication feimyks@gmail.com (corresponding author)Search for more papers by this authorJACK LINCHUAN QIU
Chinese University of Hong Kong, School of Journalism and Communication
Search for more papers by this authorCorresponding Author
ZHIFEI MAO
Shenzhen University, School of Media and Communication
Shenzhen University, School of Media and Communication feimyks@gmail.com (corresponding author)Search for more papers by this authorJACK LINCHUAN QIU
Chinese University of Hong Kong, School of Journalism and Communication
Search for more papers by this authorAbstract
The aim of this study is to enrich Beck's (2016) concept of methodological cosmopolitanism and digital metamorphosis from the perspective of communication researchers using a ‘media event', namely the live broadcasting of history through communication technology (Dayan and Katz 1992) as the research unit. Based on our observation of media events of environmental crises in China, we argue that digital metamorphoses are happening, albeit in a complicated form. These disruptive events that netizens evoke, participate in and resolve make a stronger and longer lasting impact on the social consensus about environmental protections than do pre-set pseudo-events. The effects of the digital empowerment of people are, however, case specific and the nation-state still dominates many media events pertaining to environmental crises.
References
- Althusser, L. (2006) ‘Ideology and ideological state apparatuses (notes towards an investigation)’, in A. Sharma and A. Gupta (eds) The anthropology of the state: a reader, Oxford: Blackwell, 86–111.
- Beck, U. (1992) The risk society: towards a new modernity, London: Sage.
- Beck, U. (2002) ‘The cosmopolitan society and its enemies’, Theory Culture & Society, 19 (1), 17–44, doi: 10.1177/026327640201900101.
- Beck, U. (2006) ‘Living in the world risk society: a Hobhouse Memorial Public Lecture given on Wednesday 15 February 2006 at the London School of Economics’, Economy and Society, 35 (3), 329–45, doi: 10.1080/03085140600844902.
- Beck, U. (2009) ‘Critical theory of world risk society: a cosmopolitan vision’, Constellations, 16 (1), 3–22, doi: 10.1111/j.1467-8675.2009.00534.x.
- Beck, U. (2016) The metamorphosis of the world: how climate change is transforming our concept of the world, Cambridge: Polity Press.
- Bisht, P. (2013) ‘The politics of cosmopolitan memory’, Media, Culture & Society, 35 (1), 13–20, doi: 10.1177/0163443712464553.
- Boorstin, D. J. (1962) The image: a guide to pseudo-events in America, New York: Vintage.
- Carson, R. (1962) Silent Spring, Cambridge, MS: Houghton Mifflin.
- Chakravartty, P. and D. Schiller (2010) ‘Neoliberal newspeak and digital capitalism in crisis’, International Journal of Communication, 4 (4), 670–92, available at: https://ijoc.org/index.php/ijoc/article/view/798/491.
- Chan, J. M. and Z. Mao (2017) ‘The global–local communication synchronization’, in J. M. Chan and F. L. F. Lee (eds) Advancing comparative communication research, London: Routledge, 171–203.
- Chan, J. M. and J. L. Qiu (2002) ‘China: media liberalization under authoritarianism’, in M. Price, B. Bouzumilowics and S. Verhulst (eds) Media reform: democratizing the media, democratizing the state, London: Routledge, 27–47.
- Chen, K. H. (2010) Asia as method: toward deimperialization, Durham: Duke University Press.
10.1215/9780822391692 Google Scholar
- Connell, R. (2007) Southern theory: the global dynamics of knowledge in social science, Crows Nest: Allen & Unwin.
- Cottle S. (2006) ‘Mediatized rituals: beyond manufacturing content’, Media, Culture & Society, 28 (3), 411–32, doi: 10.1177/0163443706062910.
- Cottle, S. (2009) ‘Global crises in the news: staging new wars, disasters and climate change’, International Journal of Communication, 3, 494–516, available at: https://ijoc.org/index.php/ijoc/article/view/473.
- Dayan, D. (2009) ‘Beyond media events: disenchantment, derailment, disruption’, in N. Couldry, A. Hepp and F. Krotz (eds) (2009) Media events in a global age, Abingdon: Routledge, 35–43.
- Dayan, D. and E. Katz (1992). Media events: the live broadcasting of history, Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
10.4159/9780674030305 Google Scholar
- Debord, G. (1983) Society of the spectacle, Detroit: Black & Red.
- Debord G. (1999) The society of the spectacle, translated by D. Nicholson-Smith, New York: Zone Books.
- Duan, R. and B. Takahashi (2017) ‘The two-way flow of news: a comparative study of American and Chinese newspaper coverage of Beijing's air pollution’, International Communication Gazette, 79 (1), 83–107, doi: 10.1177/1748048516656303.
- Esarey, A. and Q. Xiao (2011) ‘Digital communication and political change in China’, International Journal of Communication, 5, 298–319, available at: https://ijoc.org/index.php/ijoc/article/view/688/525.
- Foucault, M. (1977) Discipline and punish: the birth of the prison, translated by Alan Sherida, New York: Vintage Books.
- Fu, K.-w., C.-h. Chan and M. Chau (2013) ‘Assessing censorship on microblogs in China: discriminatory keyword analysis and the real-name registration policy’, IEEE Internet Computing, 17 (3), 42–50, doi: 10.1109/MIC.2013.28.
- Giddens, A. (1999) Runaway world: how globalisation is reshaping our lives, London: Profile Books.
- Katz, E. and T. Liebes (2007) ‘“No more peace!”: how disaster, terror and war have upstaged media events’, International Journal of Communication, 1 (1), 157–66, available at: https://ijoc.org/index.php/ijoc/article/view/44.
- Kellner, D. (2003) Media spectacle, London: Routledge.
10.4324/9780203166383 Google Scholar
- King, G., J. Pan and M. E. Roberts (2013) ‘How censorship in China allows government criticism but silences collective expression’, American Political Science Review, 107 (2), 326–43, available at: http://j.mp/2nxNUhk.
- Lang, K. and G. E. Lang (1953) ‘The unique perspective on television and its effects: pilot study’, American Sociological Review, 18 (1), 183–12, doi: 10.2307/2087842.
- B. Magnusson and Z. Zalloua (eds) (2016) Spectacle, Seattle: University of Washington Press.
- Mao, Z. (2014) ‘Cosmopolitanism and global risk: news framing of the Asian Financial Crisis and the European Debt Crisis’, International Journal of Communication, 8, 1029–48, available at: https://ijoc.org/index.php/ijoc/article/view/2240/1115.
- Marquis, C. and Z. Yang (2014) ‘The sharing economy in China: toward a unique local model’, China Policy Review, 9, 109–11, available at: https://hdl.handle.net/1813/40210.
- Mathews, J. A. and H. Tan (2015) China's renewable energy revolution, Houndmills, Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan, doi: 10.1057/9781137546258.0001.
10.1057/9781137546258.0001 Google Scholar
- Mezzadra, S. and B. Neilson (2013) Border as method, or, the multiplication of labor, Durham, NC: Duke University Press.
- Qiu, J. L. and J. M. Chan (2008) ‘Approaching new media events research’, Communication & Society, 9, 19–37, available at: www.cschinese.com/issue.asp?P_No=56.
- Rushkoff, D. (2011) ‘Afterword to the Vintage edition’, in D. J. Boorstin, The image: a guide to pseudo-events in America, new edition, New York: Vintage, 263–8.
- Seeck, H. and T. Rantanen (2015) ‘Media events, spectacles and risky globalization: a critical review and possible avenues for future research’, Media, Culture & Society, 37 (2), 163–79, doi:10.1177/0163443714553493.
- Stockmann, D. and M. E. Gallagher (2011) ‘Remote control: how the media sustain authoritarian rule in China’, Comparative Political Studies, 44 (4), 436–67, doi: 10.1177/0010414010394773.
- Wasserstrom, J. (2009) ‘China since Tiananmen: middle-class mobilization’, Journal of Democracy, 20 (3), 29–32, doi: 10.1353/jod.0.0090.
- WHO (2006) ‘ Air quality guidelines global update 2005: particulate matter, ozone, nitrogen dioxide and sulfur dioxide’, WHO Regional Office for Europe, Copenhagen, available from: www.euro.who.int/__data/assets/pdf_file/0005/78638/E90038.pdf.
- World Bank (n.d.) ‘ World Bank online database’, available at: https://data.worldbank.org/.
- Xiao, Q. (2011) ‘The battle for the Chinese internet’, Journal of Democracy, 22 (2), 47–61, doi: 10.1353/jod.2011.0020.
- Yang, G. (2005) ‘Environmental NGOs and institutional dynamics in China’, The China Quarterly, 181, 46–66, doi: 10.1017/S0305741005000032.
- Yang, G. (2009) The power of the Internet in China: citizen activism online, New York: Columbia University Press.
- Yang, F. (2016) ‘Under the dome: “Chinese” smog as a viral media event’, Critical Studies in Media Communication, 33 (3), 232–44, doi: 10.1080/15295036.2016.1170172.
- Yu, H. (2006) ‘From active audience to media citizenship: the case of post-Mao China’, Social Semiotics, 16 (2), 303–26, doi: 10.1080/10350330600664888.
10.1080/10350330600664888 Google Scholar
- Zhan, X. and S. Y. Tang (2013) ‘Political opportunities, resource constraints and policy advocacy of environmental NGOs in China’, Public Administration, 91 (2), 381–99, doi: 10.1111/j.1467-9299.2011.02011.x.
- Zhou, B. (2011) ‘Media exposure, civic participation and political efficacy: an empirical study on “Xiamen PX Event”’, Open Times, 5, 123–41.
- Zhou, Y. and P. Moy (2007) ‘Parsing framing processes: the interplay between online public opinion and media coverage’, Journal of Communication, 57 (1), 79–98, doi: 10.1111/j.0021-9916.2007.00330.x.