Art, climate change and (other) eco materials: rethinking the cosmopolitanization of aesthetics and the aesthetics of cosmopolitanization with Ulrich Beck
Corresponding Author
LINE MARIE THORSEN
Aarhus University, Department of Art History at the Institute of Communication and Culture, Langelandsgade 139, Building 1586, 313, 8000 Aarhus C, Denmark
Search for more papers by this authorCorresponding Author
LINE MARIE THORSEN
Aarhus University, Department of Art History at the Institute of Communication and Culture, Langelandsgade 139, Building 1586, 313, 8000 Aarhus C, Denmark
Search for more papers by this authorAbstract
Based on fieldwork in Japan and Hong Kong, I ask how methodological cosmopolitanism, as formulated by Ulrich Beck, may afford new and highly needed modes for grappling with climatically concerned art and aesthetic practices across geographical regions. I will argue that methodological cosmopolitanism serves as an important framework for approaching such art practices, and suggest that two overall intertwined strands concerning aesthetic practices engaged in global issues of climate change, emerge from this – the cosmopolitanization of aesthetics and, reversely, the aesthetics of cosmopolitanization. Departing from my fieldwork among farming artists in the Hong Kong countryside and in the Japanese satoyama – rural mountain – areas, I will, on the one hand, argue that art practices are ‘cosmopolitanized’ by the awareness of global risks, manifested in anticipation of the comprehensive climatic changes (in)discriminately affecting across nations and regions. At the same time, and importantly, art practices are actively attending to this ‘risky’ cosmopolitanization, giving aesthetic voice, form and ‘visuality’ to unfolding climatic issues and concerns and hereby practising what I will call an ‘aesthetics of cosmopolitanization’.
References
- Beck, U. (2006) The cosmopolitan vision, translated by C. Cronin, Cambridge: Polity.
- Beck, U. (2011a) ‘Cosmopolitanism as imagined communities of global risk’, American Behavioral Scientist, 55 (10), 1346–61, doi: 10.1177/0002764211409739.
- Beck, U. (2011b) ‘We do not live in an age of cosmopolitanism but in an age of cosmopolitisation: the “global other” is in our midst’, Irish Journal of Sociology, 19 (1), 16–34, doi: 10.7227/IJS.19.1.2.
10.7227/IJS.19.1.2 Google Scholar
- Beck, U. (2016) The metamorphosis of the world, Cambridge: Polity.
- Beck, U. and D. Levy (2013) ‘Cosmopolitanized nations: re-imagining collectivity in world risk society’, Theory, Culture and Society, 30 (2), 3–31, doi: 10.1177/0263276412457223.
- Beck, U. and N. Sznaider (2006) ‘Unpacking cosmopolitanism for the social sciences: a research agenda’, British Journal of Sociology, 57 (1), 1–23, doi: 10.1111/j.1468-4446.2006.00091.x.
- Beck, U., A. Blok, D. Tyfield and J. Y. Zhang (2013) ‘Cosmopolitan communities of climate risk: conceptual and empirical suggestions for a new research agenda’, Global Networks, 13 (1), 1–21, doi: 10.1111/j.1468-4446.2006.00091.x.
- Belting, H. (2009) ‘Contemporary art as global art: a critical estimate’, in H. Belting, A. Buddensieg and P. Weibel (eds) The global art world: audiences, markets and museums, Ostfildern: Hatje Cantz Verlag, 38–73.
- Belting, H., A. Buddensieg, E. Araújo, Global Art and the Museum (Project) and Zentrum für Kunst und Medientechnologie Karlsruhe (eds) (2009) The global art world: audiences, markets, and museums, Ostfildern: Hatje Cantz.
- Bishop, C. (2012) Artificial hells: participatory art and the politics of spectatorship, London: Verso Books.
- Blok, A. (2017) ‘Scoping endangered futures: rethinking the political aesthetics of climate change in world risk society’, STS Encounters, 9 (1), 1–34, available at: www.dasts.dk/wp-content/uploads/2017/05/Blok-2017-Scoping-endangered-futures.pdf.
- Boykoff, M., M. Daly, R. Fernández-Reyes, L. McAllister, M. McNatt, A. Nacu-Schmidt and O. Pearman (2018) ‘ World newspaper coverage of climate change or global warming, 2004–2018’, data set, Center for Science and Technology Policy Research, University of Colorado Boulder, doi: 10.25810/4C3B-B819.1.
- Char, E. and G. Yeung (2018) Farmers’ horizon: urban x rural, Japan x Hong Kong connect: Echigo Tsumari Art Triennale, Hong Kong: Elite Production.
- Cheetham, M. (2019) Landscape into eco art: articulations of nature since the 1960s, Pennsylvania: Penn State University Press.
- Choy, T. K. (2011) Ecologies of comparison: an ethnography of endangerment in Hong Kong, Durham, NC: Duke University Press.
10.1215/9780822393795 Google Scholar
- Demos, T. (2010) ‘The politics of sustainability: art and ecology’, in F. Manacorda, G. Sheffield, K. Bush and J. Porritt (eds) Radical nature: art and architecture for a changing planet 1969–2009, Cologne: Walther König, 16–30.
- Demos, T. J. (2013a) ‘Contemporary art and the politics of ecology: an introduction’, Third Text, 27 (1), 1–9, doi: 10.1080/09528822.2013.753187.
- Demos, T. J. (2013b) The migrant image: the art and politics of documentary during global crisis, Durham: Duke University Press.
10.1215/9780822395751 Google Scholar
- Demos, T. J. (ed.) (2013c) ‘Contemporary art and the politics of ecology’, Third Text’, 27 (1), online supplemental issue, available at: http://thirdtext.org/contemporary-art-and-the-politics-of-ecology-arc.
- Demos, T. J. (2016) Decolonizing nature: contemporary art and the politics of ecology, Berlin: Sternberg Press.
- J. Elkins (ed.) (2007) Is art history global?, London: Routledge.
- Gabrys, J. and K. Yusoff (2012) ‘Arts, sciences and climate change: practices and politics at the threshold’, Science as Culture, 21 (1), 1–24, doi: 10.1080/09505431.2010.550139.
- Gore, A. (2006) An inconvenient truth: the planetary emergency of global warming and what we can do about it, London: Bloomsbury.
- Hallam, H. (2008) ‘Globalised art history: the new universality and the question of cosmopolitanism’, Australian and New Zealand Journal of Art, 9 (1/2), 74–89, doi: 10.1080/14434318.2008.11432795.
10.1080/14434318.2008.11432795 Google Scholar
- Heise, U. K. (2008) Sense of place and sense of planet: the environmental imagination of the global, Oxford: New York: Oxford University Press.
10.1093/acprof:oso/9780195335637.001.0001 Google Scholar
- Kitagawa, F. (2015) Art place Japan: the Echigo-Tsumari triennale and the vision to reconnect art and nature, New York: Princeton Architectural Press.
- Klien, S. (2010) ‘Collaboration or confrontation? Local and non-local actors in the Echigo-Tsumari Art Triennial’, Contemporary Japan, 22 (1/2), 153–78, doi: 10.1515/cj-2010-010.
10.1515/cj-2010-010 Google Scholar
- Latour, B. (2004) Politics of nature: how to bring the sciences into democracy, Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
10.4159/9780674039964 Google Scholar
- Latour, B. (2005) ‘From realpolitik to dingpolitik: or how to make things public’, in B. Latour and P. Weibel (eds) Making things public: atmospheres of democracy, Cambridge, MA: MIT Press; ZKM/Center for Art and Media in Karlsruhe, 4–33.
- Latour, B. (2008) What is the style of matters of concern? Two lectures in empirical philosophy, Assen: Koninklijke Van Gorcum.
- Latour, B. (2011) ‘ Waiting for Gaia: composing the common world through art and politics’, lecture presented at the French Institute, London, for the launching of SPEAP, available at: www.bruno-latour.fr/sites/default/files/124-GAIA-LONDON-SPEAP_0.pdf.
- Lippard, L. R. (curator) (2007) ‘ Weather report: art and climate change’, Boulder Museum of Contemporary Art exhibition in collaboration with EcoArts, 14 September–21 December.
- Maharaj, S. (2010) ‘“Small change of the universal”: beyond modernity?’ British Journal of Sociology, 61 (3), 565–78, doi: 10.1111/j.1468-4446.2010.01326.x.
- Matilsky, B. C. (1992) Fragile ecologies: contemporary artists’ interpretations and solutions, New York: Rizzoli International.
- Morita, A., W. Suzuki and L. N. Krause (2016) 人新世の時代における実験システム [Experimental systems in the era of Anthropocene], available at: https://bit.ly/2QgOSA3.
- Ong, A. (2012) ‘“What Marco Polo forgot”: contemporary Chinese art reconfigures the global’, Current Anthropology, 53 (4), 471–94, doi: 10.1086/666699.
- Papastergiadis, N. (2007) ‘Glimpses of cosmopolitanism in the hospitality of art’, European Journal of Social Theory, 10 (1), 139–52, doi: 10.1177/1368431006068766.
10.1177/1368431006068766 Google Scholar
- Papastergiadis, N. (2010) ‘What is the South?’ Thesis Eleven, 100 (1), 141–56, doi: 10.1177/0725513609353708.
10.1177/0725513609353708 Google Scholar
- Papastergiadis, N. (2012) Cosmopolitanism and culture, Cambridge, MA: Polity Press.
- Rampley, M. (2012a) ‘Introduction’, in M. Rampley (ed.) Art history and visual studies in Europe: transnational discourses and national frameworks, Leiden: Brill, 1–13.
10.1163/9789004231702_002 Google Scholar
- Rampley, M. (2012b) ‘The construction of national art histories and the new Europe’, in M. Rampley (ed.) Art history and visual studies in Europe: transnational discourses and national frameworks, Leiden: Brill, 231–46.
10.1163/9789004231702_017 Google Scholar
- S. Smith (curator/ed.) (2005) Beyond green: toward a sustainable art, exhibition and accompanying book, Chicago: Smart Museum of Art; New York: Independent Curators Int.
- Stallabrass, J. (2004) Art incorporated: the story of contemporary art, Oxford: Oxford University Press.
- Strathern, M. (2002) ‘Foreword: not giving the game away’, in A. Gingrich and R. G. Fox (eds) Anthropology, by comparison, London: Routledge, xiii–xvii.
- A. N. Stuckenberger (ed.) (2007) Thin ice: Inuit traditions within a changing environment, Hanover, NH: Hood Museum of Art.
- Thévenot, L. (2017) ‘Arts of replanting common-places alive: engaging with artful plants to communicate environmental care’, in L. M. Thorsen (ed.) Moving plants, Næstved: R⊘nnebæksholm, 49–59.
- Thorsen, L. M. (2017a) ‘Introduction: moving plants’, in L. M. Thorsen (ed.) Moving plants, Næstved: R⊘nnebæksholm, 11–15.
- L. M. Thorsen (ed.) (2017b) Moving plants, Næstved: R⊘nnebæksholm.
- Thorsen, L. M. (2019) ‘ On the margins of eco-art: aesthetics, plants and environmental imaginations in East Asia’, Ph.D., University of Aarhus, Denmark.
- Tsing, A. L. (2005) Friction: an ethnography of global connection, Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
10.1515/9781400830596 Google Scholar
- Tsing, A. L. (2015) The mushroom at the end of the world: on the possibility of life in capitalist ruins, Princeton: Princeton University Press.
10.1515/9781400873548 Google Scholar
- 鶴見 俊輔 [Tsurumi Shunsuke] (1967) 限界芸術論 [ Genkai geijutsuron], Tokyo: Chikuma Shobō.
- A. S. Witzke and S. Hede (eds) (2009) RETHINK: contemporary art and climate change, Århus: Alexandra Institute.
- 郑波 [Zheng Bo] (2018) ‘善良人类世之生态艺术实践[Ecological art practices in a good Anthropocene]’, 中国美术学院学报 · 月刊[Journal of the National Academy of Art], 39 (6), 5–8.