Special theme introduction: methodological cosmopolitanism across the socio-cultural sciences
Corresponding Author
ANDERS BLOK
Department of Sociology, University of Copenhagen, Øster Farimagsgade 5, 1353 K⊘benhavn K., Denmark
(corresponding author) Department of Sociology, University of Copenhagen, Øster Farimagsgade 5, 1353 K⊘benhavn K., Denmark abl@soc.ku.dkSearch for more papers by this authorSABINE SELCHOW
University of Sydney, Camperdown, NSW, 2006 Australia
Search for more papers by this authorCorresponding Author
ANDERS BLOK
Department of Sociology, University of Copenhagen, Øster Farimagsgade 5, 1353 K⊘benhavn K., Denmark
(corresponding author) Department of Sociology, University of Copenhagen, Øster Farimagsgade 5, 1353 K⊘benhavn K., Denmark abl@soc.ku.dkSearch for more papers by this authorSABINE SELCHOW
University of Sydney, Camperdown, NSW, 2006 Australia
Search for more papers by this authorAbstract
The cosmopolitan sociology of Ulrich Beck has been widely recognized as making vital contributions to crosscutting conversations on globalization and transnational studies, including these debates that are being played out on the pages of Global Networks. Beck's impassioned critique of ‘methodological nationalism’ in his own discipline of sociology, in particular, has often served as a springboard for programmatic calls to attend more closely to transnational actors, issues, and processes. However, beyond the occasional acknowledgement, comparatively less attention has been paid so far to the potentialities, specificities, and practicalities of Beck's affirmative alternative vision for the socio-cultural sciences, that of ‘methodological cosmopolitanism’. Building on and extending out from research experiences obtained in Beck's East Asia and Europe-focused Cosmopolitan Climate Change (Cosmo-Climate) project, this special theme brings together experts from across a range of socio-cultural research fields to discuss and critically interrogate the challenges and capacities of doing methodological cosmopolitanism.
References
- Abbott, A. (2001) Chaos of disciplines, Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
- Beck, U. (1999) World risk society, London: Polity.
- Beck, U. (2004) ‘Cosmopolitical realism: on the distinction between cosmopolitanism in philosophy and the social sciences’, Global Networks, 4 (2), 131–56, doi: 10.1111/j.1471-0374.2004.00084.x.
- Beck, U. (2006) Cosmopolitan vision, Cambridge: Polity Press.
- Beck, U. (2007) ‘Beyond class and nation: reframing social inequalities in a globalizing world’, The British Journal of Sociology, 58 (4), 679–705, doi: 10.1111/j.1468-4446.2007.00171.x.
- Beck, U. (2010) ‘Remapping social inequalities in an age of climate change: for a cosmopolitan renewal of sociology’, Global Networks, 10 (2), 165–81, doi: 10.1111/j.1471-0374.2010.00281.x.
- Beck, U. (2016a) The metamorphosis of the world, Cambridge: Polity Press.
- Beck, U. (2016b) ‘Varieties of second modernity and the cosmopolitan vision’, Theory, Culture & Society, 33 (7/8), 257–70, doi: 10.1177/0263276416671585.
- Beck, U. and E. Grande (2007) Cosmopolitan Europe, Cambridge: Polity.
- Beck, U. and E. Grande (2010) ‘Varieties of second modernity: the cosmopolitan turn in social and political theory and research’, British Journal of Sociology, 61 (3), 409–43, doi: 10.1111/j.1468-4446.2010.01320.x.
- Beck U. and D. Levy (2013) ‘Cosmopolitanized nations: re-imagining collectivity in world risk society’ Theory, Culture & Society, 30 (2), 3–31, doi: 10.1177/0263276412457223.
- Beck, U. and N. Sznaider (2006) ‘Unpacking cosmopolitanism for the social sciences: a research agenda’, British Journal of Sociology, 57 (1), 1–23, doi: 10.1111/j.1468-4446.2006.00091.x.
- Beck, U., A. Blok, D. Tyfield and J. Zhang (2013) ‘Cosmopolitan communities of climate risk: conceptual and empirical suggestions for a new research agenda’, Global Networks, 13 (1), 1–21, doi: 10.1111/glob.12001.
- Blok, A. (2015) ‘Towards cosmopolitan middle-range theorizing: a metamorphosis in the practice of social theory?’, Current Sociology, 63 (1), 110–14, doi: 10.1177/0011392114559952.
- Blok, A. and C. B. Jensen (2019) ‘The Anthropocene event in social theory: on ways of problematizing nonhuman materiality differently’, Sociological Review, 67 (6), 1195–211, doi: 10.1177/0038026119845551.
- Delanty, G. (2009) The cosmopolitan imagination: the renewal of critical social theory, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
10.1017/CBO9780511642227 Google Scholar
- Featherstone, D. (2019) ‘Maritime labour, transnational political trajectories and decolonization from below: the opposition to the 1935 British Shipping Assistance Act’, Global Networks, 19 (4), 539–62, doi: 10.1111/glob.12228.
- Gielis R. (2009) ‘A global sense of migrant places: towards a place perspective in the study of migrant transnationalism’, Global Networks, 9 (2), 271–87, doi: 10.1111/j.1471-0374.2009.00254.x.
- Gieryn T. F. (1983) ‘Boundary-work and the demarcation of science from non-science: strains and interests in professional ideologies of scientists’, American Sociological Review, 46 (6), 781–95, doi: 10.2307/2095325.
- Glick Schiller, N. (2010) ‘Old baggage and missing luggage: a commentary on Beck and Sznaider's “Unpacking cosmopolitanism for the social sciences: a research agenda”’, British Journal of Sociology, 61 (S1), 413–20, doi: 10.1111/j.1468-4446.2009.01297.x.
- Heise, U. (2008) Sense of place and sense of planet: the environmental imagination of the global, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
10.1093/acprof:oso/9780195335637.001.0001 Google Scholar
- Jasanoff, S. (2010) ‘A new climate for society’, Theory, Culture & Society, 27 (2/3), 233–53, doi: 10.1177/0263276409361497.
- Law, J. (2004) After method: mess in social science research, London: Routledge.
10.4324/9780203481141 Google Scholar
- Latour, B. (2004) Politics of nature: how to bring the sciences into democracy, Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
10.4159/9780674039964 Google Scholar
- McFarlane, C. (2010) ‘The comparative city: knowledge, learning, urbanism’, International Journal of Urban and Regional Research, 34 (4), 725–42, doi: 10.1111/j.1468-2427.2010.00917.x.
- Mishra, N. (2012) ‘The mainstreamisation of cultural diversity: the corporates, media and similarisation of publics in India’ Journal for Communication and Culture, 2 (2), 139–59, available at: https://core.ac.uk/reader/25807210.
- Mao, Z. (2014) ‘Cosmopolitanism and global risk: news framing of the Asian financial crisis and the European debt crisis’, International Journal of Communication, 8, 1029–48, available at: https://ijoc.org/index.php/ijoc/article/download/2240/1115.
- Otto, I. M., A. Biewald, D. Coumou, G. Feulner, C. Köhler, T. Nocke, A. Blok, A. Gröber, S. Selchow, D. Tyfield, I. Volkmer, H. J. Schellnhuber and U. Beck (2015) ‘Socio-economic data for global environmental change research’, Nature Climate Change, 5, 503–6, doi: 10.1038/nclimate2593.
- Puig de la Bellacasa, M. (2012) ‘“Nothing comes without its world”: thinking with care’, Sociological Review, 60 (2), 197–216, doi: 10.1111/j.1467-954X.2012.02070.x.
- Savransky, M. (2016) The adventure of relevance: an ethics of social inquiry, Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.
10.1057/978-1-137-57146-5 Google Scholar
- Selchow, S. (2016) ‘The paths not (yet) taken: Ulrich Beck, the “cosmopolitized world” and security studies’, Security Dialogue, 47 (5), 369–85, doi: 10.1177/0967010616647859.
- Scheel, S. F. Grommé, E. Ruppert, F. Ustek-Spilda, B. Cakici and V. Takala (2019) ‘Doing a transversal method: developing an ethics of care in a collaborative research project’, Global Networks, Early View, doi: 10.1111/glob.12263.
- Thorsen, L. M. (2014) ‘Aesthetics of concern: art in the wake of the triple disaster of northeastern Japan and Hurricane Katrina’ Current Objectives of Postgraduate American Studies, 14 (2), 1–21, doi: 10.5283/copas.196.
10.5283/copas.196 Google Scholar
- Tyfield, D and A. Blok (2016) ‘Doing methodological cosmopolitanism in a mobile world’, Mobilities, 11 (4), 629–41, doi: 10.1080/17450101.2016.1211829.
- Urry, J. (2000) Sociology beyond societies: mobilities for the twenty-first century, New York: Routledge.
- Vara, A. M. (2015) ‘A South American approach to metamorphosis as a horizon of equality: focusing on controversies over lithium’, Current Sociology, 63 (1), 100–4, doi: 10.1177/0011392114559950.