Supplemental home care and topping-up: A shift from service universalism towards a new and privatised public service model?
Corresponding Author
Ulf Hjelmar
The Danish Center for Social Science Research, VIVE, Copenhagen, Denmark
Ulf Hjelmar, The Danish Center for Social Science Research, VIVE, Herluf Trolles Gade 11, 1052 Copenhagen K, Denmark
E-mail: ulhj@vive.dk
Search for more papers by this authorTine Rostgaard
The Danish Center for Social Science Research, VIVE, Copenhagen, Denmark
Search for more papers by this authorCorresponding Author
Ulf Hjelmar
The Danish Center for Social Science Research, VIVE, Copenhagen, Denmark
Ulf Hjelmar, The Danish Center for Social Science Research, VIVE, Herluf Trolles Gade 11, 1052 Copenhagen K, Denmark
E-mail: ulhj@vive.dk
Search for more papers by this authorTine Rostgaard
The Danish Center for Social Science Research, VIVE, Copenhagen, Denmark
Search for more papers by this authorAbstract
How does a public service model based on service universalism react to the introduction of market principles of topping up? In a recent so-called Free Municipality Scheme (an experimental scheme that allowed for greater operational autonomy locally in an effort to reduce state bureaucracy), a number of Danish municipalities were for the first time ever allowed to compete with for-profit providers of home care in selling supplemental home care services paid entirely by the user. The take-home message from this experience is that the introduction of supplemental home care entails challenges and eventually wider implications for the public service model, on an economic, organisational and cultural level. Supplemental services represent a new and potentially powerful combination of market and state logics that eventually redirects away from the universalist welfare state and towards a new and increasingly privatised public service model – a model where the service level is determined by the user's capacity to purchase and pay for services. The introduction of such services therefore implies a change of the potential of the Nordic welfare state to ensure equal access regardless of class and income.
References
- Andersson, K. & Kvist, E. (2015). The neoliberal turn and the marketization of care: The transformation of eldercare in Sweden. European Journal of Women's Studies, 22(3), 274–287.
- Anttonen, A. & Häikiö, L. (2011). Care “going market”: Finnish elderly care policies in transition. Nordic Journal of Social Research, 2, 1–21.
10.15845/njsr.v2i0.111 Google Scholar
- Anttonen, A. & Karsio, O. (2017). How marketisation is changing the Nordic model of care for older people. In: F. Martinelli, A. Anttonen& M. Mätzke(Eds.), Social services disrupted: Changes, challenges and policy implications for Europe in times of austerity (pp. 219–238). Cheltenham, England: Edward Elgar.
10.4337/9781786432117.00020 Google Scholar
- Anttonen, A. & Sipilä, J. (2012). Universalism in the British and Scandinavian social policy Debates. In: A. Anttonen, L. Häikiö& K. Stefansson(Eds.), Welfare state, universalism and diversity (pp. 16–41). Cheltenham, England: Edward Elgar.
10.4337/9781849805940.00007 Google Scholar
- Askim, J., Hjelmar, U., & Pedersen, L. H. (2018). Turning innovation into evidence-based policies. Lessons learned from the Nordic free communes experiments. Scandinavian Political Studies, 41(4), 288–308.
- Bergh, A. (2008). The universal welfare state. Theory and the case of Sweden. Political Studies, 52, 745–766.
- Brennan, D., Cass, B., Himmelweit, S., & Szebehely, M. (2012). The marketization of care: Rationales and consequences in Nordic and liberal care regimes. Journal of European Social Policy, 22(4), 377–391.
- Brook, L., Hall, J., & Preston, I. (2000). What drives support for higher public spending? Journal of Social Policy, 29(2), 329−354.
- Burau, V., Theobald, H., & Blank, R. H. (2007). Governing home care: A cross-national comparison. Cheltenham, England: Edward Elgar.
10.4337/9781847206862 Google Scholar
- Dahl, H. M. (2009). New public management, care and struggles about recognition. Critical Social Policy, 29(4), 634–654.
- Danish Ministry of Finance. (2016). Fair og lige konkurrence [Competition on fair and equal terms]. Danish Ministry of Finance, København, Denmark.
- Deloitte. (2013). Ældreområdet – internationale perspektiver [Elderly care – International perspectives]. København, Denmark: Social- og Integrationsministeriet.
- Doyle, M. & Timonen, V. (2008). Breaking the mould: New trajectories in the domiciliary care of older people in Ireland. International Journal of Social Welfare, 17, 324–332.
- Erlandsson, S., Storm, P., Stranz, A., Szebehely, M., & Trydegård, G.-B. (2013). Marketisation trends in Swedish eldercare: Competition, choice and calls for stricter regulation. In: G. Meagher& M. Szebehely(Eds.), Marketisation in Nordic eldercare: A report on legislation, oversight, extent and consequences (pp. 23–84). Stockholm, Sweden: Stockholm University & Normacare.
- Henriksson, L. & Wrede, S. (2008). Care work in the context of a transforming welfare state. In: S. Wrede, L. Henriksson, H. Høst, S. Johansson, & B. Dybbroe(Eds.), Care work in crisis: Reclaiming the Nordic ethos of care (pp. 121–30). Lund, Sweden: Studentlitteratur.
- Hjelmar, U. & Christiansen, A. M. (2016). Tilkøbsydelser på ældreområdet – en ny mulighed for kommunerne? [Supplemental services in elderly care: A new option for municipalities?]. København, Denmark: KORA.
- Hood, C. (1991). A public management for all seasons. Public Administration, 69(1), 3–19.
- Karsio, O. & Anttonen, A. (2013). Marketisation of eldercare in Finland: Legal frames, out-sourcing practices and the rapid growth of for-profit services. In: G. Meagher& M. Szebehely(Eds.), Marketisation in Nordic eldercare: A report on legislation, oversight, extent and consequences (pp. 85–126). Stockholm, Sweden: Stockholm University, Department of Social Work & Normacare.
- Kvale, S. & Brinkman, S. (2008). Interviews. Learning the craft of qualitative research. London, England: Sage.
- Miles, M. B. & Huberman, M. (1994). Qualitative data analysis. London, England: Sage.
- Moberg, L. (2017). Marketisation of Nordic eldercare – Is the model still universal? Journal of Social Policy, 46(3), 603–621.
- Petersen, O. H. & Hjelmar, U. (2014). Marketization of welfare services in Scandinavia: A review of Swedish and Danish experiences. Scandinavian Journal of Public Administration, 17(4), 3–20.
- Pierson, P. (1996). The new politics of the welfare state. World Politics, 48(2), 143–179.
- Puthenparambil, J. M., Kröger, T., & Van Aerschot, L. (2017). Users of home-care services in a Nordic welfare state under marketisation: The rich, the poor and the sick. Health & Social Care in the Community, 25(1), 54–64.
- Rauch, D. (2007). Is there really a Scandinavian Social Service Model? Acta Sociologica, 50(3), 249–269.
- Razavi, S. (2007). The political and social economy of care in a development context. Geneva, Switzerland: UNRISD.
- Rostgaard, T., Andersen, M. H., Clement, S. L., & Rasmussen, S. (2013). Omsorgsbetinget livskvalitet og hjemmehjælp [Quality of life and home care]. Aalborg, Denmark: Aalborg Universitet.
- Rostgaard, T. (2017). Providing choice in a public long-term care system. The implication of free choice in Danish home care. In: D. Pilling & K. Christensen (Eds.), Ashgate research companion to care work around the world. London, England: Ashgate.
- Rostgaard, T. & Matthiessen, M. (2017). Frit valg i hjemmeplejen – Arbejdsvilkår for medarbejdere i privat og offentlig hjemmepleje [Free choice in home care – Working conditions in private and public home care]. København, Denmark: KORA.
- Rostgaard, T. & Matthiessen, M. (2019). Hjælp til svage ældre [Help to the elderly]. København, Denmark: VIVE.
- Sipilä, J., Anttonen, A., & Kröger, T. (2009). A Nordic welfare state in post-industrial society. In: J. L. Powell& J. Hendricks(Eds.), The welfare state in post-industrial society: A global perspective (pp. 181–199). Dordrecht, Netherlands: Springer.
10.1007/978-1-4419-0066-1_10 Google Scholar
- Svensson, M. & Edebalk, P. G. (2006). Kvalitetskonkurrens och kundval inom kommunal äldreomsorg [Competition and choice in local elderly care services]. Konkurrensverkets uppdragsforskningsserie 2006:6. Stockholm, Sweden: Konkurrensverket.
- Szebehely, M. & Meagher, G. (2011). Private financing of elderly care in Sweden. Stockholm, Sweden: Institute for Futures Studies.
- Szebehely, M. & Meagher, G. (2018). Nordic eldercare – Weak universalism becoming weaker? Journal of European Social Policy, 28(3), 294–308.
- Szebehely, M. & Trydegård, G.-B. (2012). Home care for older people in Sweden: A universal model in transition. Health & Social Care in the Community, 20(3), 300–309.
- Tufte, P. & Dahl, H. M. (2016). Navigating the field of temporally framed care in the Danish home care sector. Sociology of Health & Illness, 38(1), 109–122.
- Vabø, M., Christensen, K., Jacobsen, F. F., & Trætteberg, H. D. (2013). Marketisation in Norwegian eldercare: Preconditions, trends and resistance. In: G. Meagher & M. Szebehely (Eds.), Marketisation in Nordic eldercare: A report on legislation, oversight, extent and consequences (pp. 163–202). Stockholm studies in social work 30. Stockholm, Sweden: Stockholm University, Department of Social Work & Normacare.