Institutions and the gender wage gap: How production and welfare regime moderates the effect of family policy
Corresponding Author
Ji Young Kang
Department of Social Welfare, Hannam University, Daejeon, South Korea
Ji Young Kang, Department of Social Welfare, Hannam University, 70 Hannam-ro Daedeok-gu Daejeon, South Korea
E-mail: jiyoungksw@hnu.kr
Search for more papers by this authorCorresponding Author
Ji Young Kang
Department of Social Welfare, Hannam University, Daejeon, South Korea
Ji Young Kang, Department of Social Welfare, Hannam University, 70 Hannam-ro Daedeok-gu Daejeon, South Korea
E-mail: jiyoungksw@hnu.kr
Search for more papers by this authorAbstract
The aim of this study was to determine whether the effects of work and family reconciliation policy on the gender wage gap are moderated by institutional contexts of production and welfare regime. Using time-series analysis for 13 countries from 1981 to 2015, the study revealed a strong association between childcare and a lower gender wage gap in the Coordinated Market Economies (CMEs)/social democratic welfare states but not in Liberal Market Economies (LMEs)/liberal welfare states. The study also found that the impact of leave generosity on the gender wage gap in CMEs/social democratic welfare states is less salient than in CMEs/continental welfare states. This study highlights the extent to which family policy affects the gender wage gap hinges on how each country organises its market coordination and welfare institutions and pushes the current literature forward to a question of ‘what kinds of’ family policy matters in ‘which’ production and welfare regimes.
Open Research
Data Availability Statement
The data that support the findings of this study are available from the corresponding author upon reasonable request.
References
- Arulampalam, W., Booth, A., & Bryan, M. (2007). Is there a glass ceiling over Europe? Exploring the gender pay gap across the wage distribution. ILR Review, 60(2), 163–186.
- Bambra, C. (2007). Defamilisation and welfare state regimes: A cluster analysis. International Journal of Social Welfare, 16(4), 326–336.
- Becker, G. (1991). A Treatise on the family. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.
10.4159/9780674020665 Google Scholar
- Berger, L. M., Hill, J., & Waldfogel, J. (2005). Maternity leave, early maternal employment and child health and development in the US. The Economic Journal, 115(501), 29–47.
- Blau, F. D. & Kahn, L. M. (2003). Understanding international differences in the gender pay gap. Journal of Labor Economics, 21(1), 106–144.
- Boeckmann, I., Misra, J., & Budig, M. (2015). Mother's employment in wealthy countries: Cultural and institutional factor shaping mothers' employment and working hours in postindustrial countries. Social Forces, 93(4), 1301–1333.
- Bonoli, G. (1997). Classifying welfare states: A two-dimension approach. Journal of Social Policy, 26(3), 351–372.
- Booth, A. & Francesconi, M. (2003). Union coverage and non-standard work in Britain. Oxford Economic Papers, 55(3), 383–416.
- Brady, D., Huber, E., & Stephens, J. (2014). Comparative welfare states data set. University of North Carolina and WZB Berlin Social Science Center.
- Budig, M. & England, P. (2001). The Wage penalty for motherhood. American Sociological Review, 66(2), 204–225.
- Charles, M., Buchmann, M., Halebsky, S., Powers, J. M., & Smith, M. (2001). The context of women’s market careers – A cross-national study. Work and Occupations, 28(3), 371–396.
- Datta Gupta, N., Smith, N., & Verner, M. (2008). Child care and parental leave in the Nordic countries: A model to aspire to? Review of Economics of the Household, 6(1), 65–89.
- Ebbinghaus, B. & Manow, P. (2001). Comparing welfare capitalism: Social policy and political economy in Europe, Japan, and the USA. New York, NY: Routledge.
- Esping-Andersen, G. (1990). The three worlds of welfare capitalism. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
- Estevez-Abe, M. (2005). Gender bias in skills and social policies: The varieties of capitalism perspective on sex segregation. Social Politics, 12(2), 180–215.
- Estevez-Abe, M. (2006). Gendering the varieties of capitalism: A study of occupational segregation by sex in advanced industrial societies. World Politics, 59(1), 142–175.
- Estevez-Abe, M., Iversen, T., & Soskice, D. (2001). Social protection and the formation of skills: A reinterpretation of the welfare state. In P. A. Hall & D. Soskice (Eds.), Varieties of capitalism: The institutional foundations of comparative advantage (pp. 145–183). Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press.
10.1093/0199247757.003.0004 Google Scholar
- Evertsson, M., Grunow, D., & Aisenbrey, S. (2016). Work interruptions and young women’s career prospects in Germany, Sweden and the U.S. Work, Employment, and Society, 30(2), 291–308.
- Fenger, H. (2007). Welfare regimes in Central and Eastern Europe: Incorporating post-communist countries in a welfare regime typology. Contemporary Issues and Ideas in Social Sciences. Retrieved from http://www.learneurope.eu/files/9913/7483/4204/Welfare_regimes_in_Central_and_Eastern_Europe.pdf
- Ferrera, M. (1996). The 'Southern model' of welfare in Social Europe. Journal of European Social Policy, 6(1), 17–37.
10.1177/095892879600600102 Google Scholar
- Frege, C. & Godard, J. (2014). Varieties of capitalism and job quality: The attainment of civic principles at work in the United States and Germany. American Sociological Review, 79(5), 942–965.
- Gornick, J. C. & Meyers, M. K. (2008). Creating gender egalitarian societies: An agenda for reform. Politics & Society, 36(3), 313–349.
- Grönlund, A. & Magnusson, C. (2016). Family-friendly policies and women's wages – is there a trade-off? Skill investments, occupational segregation and the gender pay gap in Germany, Sweden and the U.K. European Societies, 18, 91–113.
- Hall, P. & Soskice, D. (2001). An introduction to varieties of capitalism. In P. A. Hall & D. Soskice (Eds.), Varieties of capitalism: The institutional foundations of comparative advantage (pp. 1–68). Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press.
10.1093/0199247757.003.0001 Google Scholar
- Hegewisch, A. & Gornick, J. (2011). The impact of work-family policies on women's employment: A review of research from OECD countries. Community, Work & Family, 14(2), 119–138.
10.1080/13668803.2011.571395 Google Scholar
- Hicks, A. M. (1994). Introduction to pooling. In T. Janoski & A. M. Hicks (Eds.), The comparative political economy of the welfare state (pp. 169–188). Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
- Huber, E. & Stephens, J. D. (2001). Development and crisis of the welfare state. Chicago: The University of Chicago Press.
10.7208/chicago/9780226356495.001.0001 Google Scholar
- Hundley, G. (2000). Male/female earnings differences in self-employment: The effects of marriage, children, and the household division of labor. Industrial and Labor Relations Review, 54(1), 95–114.
- Iversen, T. (2005). Capitalism, democracy, and welfare. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
10.1017/CBO9780511758645 Google Scholar
- Iversen, T. & Rosenbluth, F. (2006). The political economy of gender: Explaining cross-national variation in the gender division of labor and the gender voting gap. American Journal of Political Science, 50(1), 1–19.
- Iversen, T. & Soskice, D. (2001). An asset theory of social policy preferences. American Political Science Review, 95(4), 875–893.
- Iversen, T. & Soskice, D. (2006). Electoral institutions and the politics of coalitions: Why some democracies redistribute more than others. American Political Science Review, 100(2), 165–181.
- Iversen, T. & Stephens, J. (2008). Partisan politics, the welfare state, and three worlds of human capital formation. Comparative Political Studies, 41(4–5), 600–637.
- Judge, G., Griffiths, W., Hill, R. C., Lutkepohl, H., & Lee, T.-C. (1985). The theory and practice of econometrics (2nd ed.). New York, NY: Wiley.
- Kang, J. Y. & Meyers, M. K. (2018). Family policy changes across welfare and production regime, 1990 to 2010. In G. B. Eydal & T. Rostgaard (Eds.), Handbook of family policy (pp. 66–82). Cheltenham, UK: Edward Elgar Publishing.
10.4337/9781784719340.00013 Google Scholar
- Korpi, W., Ferrarini, T., & Englund, S. (2013). Women’s opportunities under different family policy constellations: Gender, class, and inequality tradeoffs in western countries re-examined. Social Politics, 20(1), 1–40.
- Mandel, H. (2009). Configurations of gender inequality: The consequences of ideology and public policy. The British Journal of Sociology, 60(4), 693–719.
- Mandel, H. (2010). Winners and losers: The consequences of welfare state policies for gender wage inequality. European Sociological Review, 28(2), 241–262.
- Mandel, H. & Semyonov, M. (2005). Family policies, wage structures, and gender gaps: Sources of earnings inequality in 20 countries. American Sociological Review, 70(6), 949–967.
- Mandel, H. & Semyonov, M. (2006). A welfare state paradox: State interventions and women’ s employment opportunities in 22 countries. American Journal of Sociology, 111(6), 1910–1949.
- Mandel, H., & Shalev, M. (2006). A welfare state paradox: State interventions and women’s employment opportunities in 22 countries. American Journal of Sociology, 111, 1910–1949.
- Mandel, H. & Shalev, M. (2009). Gender, class, and varieties of capitalism. Social Politics, 16(2), 161–181.
- Martin, C. J. & Thelen, K. (2007). Contributions of the public sector to social solidarity in postindustrial societies. World Politics, 60(1), 1–36.
- Matteazzi, E., Pailhé, A., & Solaz, A. (2018). Part-time employment, the gender wage gap and the role of wage-setting institutions: Evidence from 11 European countries. European Journal of Industrial Relations, 24(3), 221–241.
- McGuinness, S., Kelly, E., O’Connell, P., & Callan, T. (2011). The impact of wage bargaining and worker preferences on the gender pay gap. European Journal of Industrial Relations, 17(3), 277–293.
- Miller, P. & Eastough, K. (2004). The gender wage gap in paid- and self-employment. Australian Economic Papers, 43(3), 257–276.
10.1111/j.1467-8454.2004.00229.x Google Scholar
- Morgan, K. J. (2005). The ‘production’ of child care: How labor markets shape social policy and vice versa. Social Politics, 12(2), 243–263.
- O’Connor, J. S. (1993). Gender, class and citizenship in the analysis of welfare state regimes: comparative issues theoretical and methodological issues. The British Journal of Sociology, 44(3), 501–518.
- OECD. (2017). Gender wage gap (indicator). https://doi.org/10.1787/7cee77aa-en
10.1787/9789264281318-15-en Google Scholar
- OECD. (2018). Length of maternity leave, parental leave, and paid father-specific leave. Retrieved from http://stats.oecd.org/index.aspx?queryid=54760
- OECD. (2020). Public expenditure on daycare/home-help services under family policy, as a percentage of GDP. Source: OECD, Social Expenditure Statistics (database). https://doi.org/10.1787/data-00166-en
- Pettit, B. & Hook, J. (2005). The structure of women's employment in comparative perspective. Social Forces, 84(2), 779–801.
- Pettit, B., & Hook, J. (2009). Gendered tradeoffs: Women, family, and workplace inequality in twenty-one countries. New York: Russell Sage Foundation.
- Pierson, P. (2001). The new politics of the welfare state. Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press.
10.1093/0198297564.001.0001 Google Scholar
- Podesta, F. (2016). Recent developments in quantitative comparative methodology: The case of pooled time series cross-section analysis. DSS paper SOC, 3-02. Retrieved from http://docplayer.net/388149-Recent-developments-in-quantitative-comparative-methodology.html
- Rubery, J. (2009). How gendering the varieties of capitalism requires a wider lens. Social Politics: International Studies in Gender, State & Society, 16(2), 192–203.
- Rueda, D. (2005). Insider-outsider politics in industrialized democracies: The challenge to social democratic parties. American Political Science Review, 99(1), 61–74.
- Rueda, D. & Pontusson, J. (2000). Wage inequality and varieties of capitalism. World Politics, 52(3), 350–383.
- Schäfer, A. & Gottschall, K. (2015). From wage regulation to wage gap. How wage-setting institutions and structures shape the gender wage gap across three industries in 24 European Countries and in Germany. Cambridge Journal of Economics, 39(2), 467–496.
- Schroeder, M. (2009). Integrating welfare and production typologies: How refinements of the varieties of capitalism approach call for a combination of welfare typologies. Journal of Social Policy, 38(1), 19–43.
- Thelen, K. (2012). Varieties of capitalism: Trajectories of liberalization and the new politics of social solidarity. Annual Reviews of Political Science, 15, 137–159.
- Tomaskovic-Devey, D. & Skaggs, S. (1999). An establishment-level test of the statistical discrimination hypothesis. Work and Occupations, 26(4), 422–445.
- Tomlinson, J. (2007). Employment regulation, welfare and gender regimes: A comparative analysis of women’ s working-time patterns and work–life balance in the UK and the US. The International Journal of Human Resource Management, 18(3), 401–415.
- Visser, J. (2006). Union membership statistics in 24 countries. Monthly Labor Review, 129(1), 38–49.