Volume 32, Issue 4 p. 616-632

The Protective Action Decision Model: Theoretical Modifications and Additional Evidence

Michael K. Lindell

Corresponding Author

Michael K. Lindell

Texas A&M University, Hazard Reduction & Recovery Center, College Station, TX, USA.

Michael K. Lindell, Texas A&M University, Hazard Reduction & Recovery Center, College Station, TX 77843-3137, USA; mlindell@tamu.eduSearch for more papers by this author
Ronald W. Perry

Ronald W. Perry

Arizona State University, School of Public Affairs, Phoenix AZ, USA.

Search for more papers by this author
First published: 20 June 2011
Citations: 1,015

Abstract

The Protective Action Decision Model (PADM) is a multistage model that is based on findings from research on people's responses to environmental hazards and disasters. The PADM integrates the processing of information derived from social and environmental cues with messages that social sources transmit through communication channels to those at risk. The PADM identifies three critical predecision processes (reception, attention, and comprehension of warnings or exposure, attention, and interpretation of environmental/social cues)—that precede all further processing. The revised model identifies three core perceptions—threat perceptions, protective action perceptions, and stakeholder perceptions—that form the basis for decisions about how to respond to an imminent or long-term threat. The outcome of the protective action decision-making process, together with situational facilitators and impediments, produces a behavioral response. In addition to describing the revised model and the research on which it is based, this article describes three applications (development of risk communication programs, evacuation modeling, and adoption of long-term hazard adjustments) and identifies some of the research needed to address unresolved issues.

The full text of this article hosted at iucr.org is unavailable due to technical difficulties.