Volume 77, Issue 1 p. 23-33
Article

What Is a Parergon?

PAUL DURO

PAUL DURO

Department of Art History/Visual and Cultural Studies, University of Rochester, Rochester, New York, 14627-0001

Search for more papers by this author
First published: 12 February 2019
Citations: 2

ABSTRACT

Despite important recent work, the rehabilitation of parergon as a critical concept in the history of art has yet to be fully broached. From the time Jacques Derrida introduced the term into contemporary critical theory in The Truth in Painting, its character and function have been largely understood as referencing a threshold or boundary—in particular, that of the border of the artwork. Yet a review of the term's long history suggests a meaning that differs in significant ways from its current near-univocal characterization as a synonym for a frame. In particular, premodern art theory and criticism identifies a parergon with matters such as the background action in a history painting, the inclusion in a landscape of picturesque embellishments, or, following Kant, the addition of ornament to a painting, a statue, or a building. This article therefore proposes we ask again: What is a parergon?

The full text of this article hosted at iucr.org is unavailable due to technical difficulties.