Excess Burden of Taxation and Environmental Policy Mix with a Consumer-Friendly Firm
Abstract
This study examines the environmental policy mix of tradable emission permits and emission taxes in a duopoly model with a consumer-friendly firm. We analyse the interplay of the two policies and the welfare consequences in the presence of excess burden of taxation. We show that an emission tax can be redundant when both the excess burden of taxation and the degree of consumer friendliness are insignificant. However, when the excess burden of taxation is significant, tradable permits policy with tax treatment should be applied to enhance welfare in the presence of a consumer-friendly firm. Finally, under the tax revenue-neutral case where the excess burden of taxation does not matter, the environmental policy mix is also efficient if the degree of consumer friendliness is sufficiently high.
References
- Benabou, R. and J. Tirole (2010) “Individual and Corporate Social Responsibility”, Economica, Vol. 77, 1–19.
- Borenstein, S. (1988) “On the Efficiency of Competitive Markets for Operating Licenses”, Quarterly Journal of Economics, Vol. 103, No. 2, 357–385.
- Bovenberg, A. and R. De Mooij (1994) “Environmental Levies and Distortionary Taxation”, American Economic Review, Vol. 84, No. 4, 1085–1089.
- Bovenberg, A. and L. Goulder (1996) “Optimal Environmental Taxation in the Presence of Other Taxes: General-Equilibrium Analyses”, American Economic Review, Vol. 86, No. 44, 985–1000.
- Brand, B. and M. Grothe (2015) “Social Responsibility in a Bilateral Monopoly.” Journal of Economics, Vol. 115, No. 3, 275–289.
- Burtraw, D. and K. McCormack (2017) “Consignment Auctions of Free Emissions Allowances”, Energy Policy, Vol. 107, 337–344.
- Crifo, P. and V. Forget (2015) “The Economics of Corporate Social Responsibility: A Firm-Level Perspective Survey”, Journal of Economic Survey, Vol. 29, 112–130.
- Fowlie, M. (2010) “Emissions Trading, Electricity Restructuring, and Investment in Pollution Abatement”, American Economic Review Vol. 100, No. 3, 837–869.
- Fullerton, D. (1997) “Environmental Levies and Distortionary Taxation: Comment”, American Economic Review, Vol. 87, No. 1, 245–251.
- Garcia, A., M. Leal and S.-H. Lee (2018) “Time-Inconsistent Environmental Policies with a Consumer-Friendly Firm: Tradable Permits versus Emission Tax”, International Review of Economics and Finance, Vol. 58, 523–537.
- Hsu, C. C., J-Y. Lee and L. Wang (2017) “Consumers Awareness and Environmental Policy in Differentiated Mixed Oligopoly”, International Review of Economics and Finance, Vol. 51, 444–454.
- Kato, K. (2006) “Can Allowing to Trade Permits Enhance Welfare in Mixed Oligopoly?” Journal of Economics, Vol. 88, No. 3, 263–283.
- Khezr, P. and I. MacKenzie (2018) “Consignment Auctions”, Journal of Environmental Economics and Management, Vol. 87, 42–51.
- Kitzmueller, M. and J. Shimshack (2012) “Economic Perspectives on Corporate Social Responsibility”, Journal of Economic Literature, Vol. 50, 51–84.
- Kopel, M. and B. Brand (2012) “Socially Responsible Firms and Endogenous Choice of Strategic Incentives”, Economic Modelling, Vol. 29, No. 3, 982–989.
- Laffont, J.-J., and Tirole, J. (1986) “Using Cost Observation to Regulate Firms”, Journal of Political Economy, Vol. 94, No. 3, 614–641.
- Lambertini, L. and A. Tampieri (2015) “Incentives, Performance and Desirability of Socially Responsible Firms in a Cournot Oligopoly”, Economic Modelling, Vol. 50, 40–48.
- Leal, M., A. Garcia, and S.-H. Lee (2018) “The Timing of Environmental Tax Policy With a Consumer-Friendly Firm”, Hitotsubashi Journal of Economics, Vol. 59, No. 1, 25–43.
- Lee, S.-H. and I.-T. Kim (2000) “Self-Selection and Optimal Nonlinear Effluent Charges”, Environmental and Resource Economics, Vol. 16, 1–14.
- Lee, S.-H. and S.-H. Park (2005) “Tradable Emission Permits Regulations: The Role of Product Differentiation”, International Journal of Business and Economics, Vol. 4, No. 3, 249–261.
- Lian, X., Q. Gong, L. Wang (2018) “Consumer Awareness and Ex-ante versus ex-post Environmental Policies Revisited”, International Review of Economics and Finance, Vol. 55, 68–77.
- Lin, J. and G. Tan (1999) “Policy Burdens, Accountability, and the Soft Budget Constraint”, American Economic Review, Vol. 89, No. 2, 426–431.
- Liu, C., Wang, L. and Lee, S.-H.(2015). “Strategic Environmental Corporate Social Responsibility in a Differentiated Duopoly”, Economics Letters, Vol. 129, 108–111.
- McWilliams, A. and D. Siegel (2001) “Corporate Social Responsibility: A Theory of the Firm Perspective”, Academy of Management Review, Vol. 26, 117–127.
- Malueg, D. (1990) “Welfare Consequences of Emission Credit Trading Programs”, Journal of Environmental Economics and Management, Vol. 18, No. 1, 66–77.
- Matsumura, T. and A. Ogawa (2014) “Corporate Social Responsibility or Payoff Asymmetry? A Study of an Endogenous Timing Game”, Southern Economic Journal, Vol. 81, No. 2, 457–473.
- Matsumura, T. and Tomaru, Y. (2013) “Mixed Duopoly, Privatization, and Subsidization with Excess Burden of Taxation”, Canadian Journal of Economics, Vol. 46, No. 2, 526–554.
- Matsumura, T. and Tomaru, Y. (2015) “Mixed Duopoly, Location Choice, and Shadow Cost of Public Funds”, Southern Economic Journal, Vol. 82, No. 2, 416–429.
- Moreno, D. and L. Ubeda (2006) “Capacity Precommitment and Price Competition Yield the Cournot Outcome”, Games and Economic Behavior, Vol. 56, No. 2, 323–332.
- Pal, R. and B. Saha (2015) “Pollution Tax, Partial Privatization and Environment”, Resource and Energy Economics, Vol. 40, 19–35.
- Requate, T. (1993) “Pollution Control in a Cournot Duopoly via Taxes or Permits”, Journal of Economics, Vol. 58, No. 3, 255–291.
- Sartzetakis, E. (1997) “Tradeable Emission Permits Regulations in the Presence of Imperfectly Competitive Product Markets: Welfare Implications”, Environmental and Resource Economics, Vol. 9, No. 1, 65–81.
10.1007/BF02441370 Google Scholar
- Sartzetakis, E. (2004) “On the Efficiency of Competitive Markets for Emission Permits”, Environmental and Resource Economics, Vol. 27, No. 1, 1–19.
- Schreck, P. (2011) “Reviewing the Business Case for Corporate Social Responsibility: New Evidence and Analysis”, Journal of Business Ethics, Vol. 103, 167–188.
- Stavins, R. (1998) “What Can We Learn from the Grand Policy Experiment? Lessons from SO2 Allowance Trading”, Journal of Economic Perspectives, Vol. 12, No. 3, 69–88.
- Wang, L. and J. Wang (2009) “Environmental Taxes in a Differentiated Mixed Duopoly”, Economic Systems, Vol. 33, No. 4, 389–396.
10.1016/j.ecosys.2009.08.002 Google Scholar
- Xu, L. and S.-H. Lee (2018) “ The Timing of Environmental Policies with Excess Burden of Taxation in Free-Entry Mixed Markets”, International Review of Economics and Finance, article in Press.
- Xu, L., S. Cho and S.-H. Lee (2016a) “Emission Tax and Optimal Privatization in Cournot–Bertrand Comparison”, Economic Modelling, Vol. 55, 73–82.
- Xu, L., S.-H. Lee and L. Wang (2016b) “Free Trade Agreements and Privatization Policy with an Excess Burden of Taxation”, Japan and World Economy, Vol. 37, 55–64.