Volume 59, Issue 3 p. 476-483
Research Article

Attributing Problem-Solving to God, Receiving Social Support, and Stress-Moderation

G. “Chuck” Rainville

Corresponding Author

G. “Chuck” Rainville

Research Department, AARP

Correspondence should be addressed to G. “Chuck” Rainville, AARP Research Department, 601 E. Street NW, Washington DC, 20049. E-mail: grainville@aarp.org

Search for more papers by this author
Neal Krause

Neal Krause

School of Public Health, University of Michigan

Search for more papers by this author
First published: 14 July 2020
Citations: 1

Note: The ideas expressed in this paper do not necessarily reflect those of AARP.

Data availability/Replication: AARP datasets are archived after official use at https://ropercenter.cornell.edu/aarp

Abstract

This research note explores the stress-moderating effects of attributing a problem-solving role to God among a nationwide sample of 2,260 Americans. Specifically, the ways in which the perception of “God-as-a-problem-solver” moderates stress is explored for Americans reporting low and high levels of social support from other people. Within a model that interacts two moderators (i.e., a moderated moderation analysis), two predictions are tested that extend from social support and sense of control frameworks. Consistent with one prediction, viewing God-as-a-problem-solver had a stress-buffering effect (i.e., a reduction of the negative impact of life stressors on a depressive symptomology outcome measure) among those receiving low social support. Consistent with a second prediction, viewing God-as-a-problem-solver served as a stress-exacerbator among those already receiving high levels of social support. Findings suggest that the optimal count of supportive sets of entities (be it God or other people) is no fewer or no more than one.

The full text of this article hosted at iucr.org is unavailable due to technical difficulties.