Volume 59, Issue 4 p. 586-605
Research Article

Still Opting for the Poor: The Brazilian Catholic Church and the National Movement of the Street Population

Madeleine Cousineau

Corresponding Author

Madeleine Cousineau

Retired Professor of Sociology, Mount Ida College

Correspondence should be addressed to Madeleine Cousineau. E-mail: madeleinecousineau@gmail.com

Search for more papers by this author
First published: 04 August 2020
Citations: 2

Acknowledgements: The author would like to thank Daniel Levine, Cecília Mariz, Robert Mackin, and Jerry Pankhurst, as well as the JSSR Editor and three anonymous reviewers, for their helpful comments on earlier versions of this article. Funding for this research was provided by Jack Shand Grants from the Society for the Scientific Study of Religion and a Joseph H. Fichter Grant (for gathering data on the role of religious sisters in organizing the Pastoral of the Street) from the Association for the Sociology of Religion.

[Corrected article updated on 17 August 2020, after first online publication.]

Abstract

Have rumors of the demise of liberation theology been greatly exaggerated? There is a prevailing belief among scholars and other observers that the Latin American Catholic Church has withdrawn from the preferential option for the poor, which had encouraged a combination of faith and activism for social justice. This article challenges that belief by means of qualitative data gathered during 8 months in Brazil that provide evidence of close connections between the Pastoral of the Street, a church program that mobilizes homeless people, and the National Movement of the Street Population (MNPR). The principal data came from 42 interviews with homeless or formerly homeless people, movement leaders, and religious sisters and lay workers in the pastoral program. Participant observation and documentary research supplemented the interviews. The findings demonstrate that the Pastoral of the Street helped to create the MNPR and continues to provide it with material and ideological support.

The full text of this article hosted at iucr.org is unavailable due to technical difficulties.