To rely or not to rely on common sense? Introducing critical Realism's insights to social network analysis
Corresponding Author
Sourabh Singh
Florida State University, Tallahassee, Florida, USA
Correspondence
Sourabh Singh, Florida State University, Tallahassee, Florida, USA.
Email: ssingh2@fsu.edu
Search for more papers by this authorCorresponding Author
Sourabh Singh
Florida State University, Tallahassee, Florida, USA
Correspondence
Sourabh Singh, Florida State University, Tallahassee, Florida, USA.
Email: ssingh2@fsu.edu
Search for more papers by this authorAbstract
In this article, I aim to critically evaluate the epistemological position of social network analysis. My main point is that while the two main schools of social network analysis – formalism and relationalism – claim to be different because of their respective comprehensions of the ontology of social networks, epistemologically they both rely on network actors' commonsensical comprehension of social ties to conduct social network analysis. Following critical realists' insights into the depth ontology of the social world, I argue that social network analysts must break from their and network actors' commonsensical comprehension of social ties in order to illustrate the objective principles of social networks. I suggest that one strategy for doing so is to treat the current networks of social actors under investigation as a product of historically shaped and state-mediated contests among social actors to define hierarchical features of their social relations. I present my study of the history of social networks in Indian politics during the early postcolonial period (1947–64) in support of my points.
REFERENCES
- Aaltola, M. (2005). The international airport: The hub-and-spoke pedagogy of the American empire. Global Networks, 5(3), 261–278.
- Adams, J. (1994). The familial state: Elite family practices and state-making in the early modern Netherlands. Theory and Society, 23(4), 505–539.
- Andeweg, R. B. (2000). Consociational democracy. Annual Review of Political Science, 3(1), 509–536.
- Bachelard, G. (2002). The formation of the scientific mind: A contribution to a psychoanalysis of objective knowledge. Manchester: Clinamen Press.
- Barrera Jr, M, Sandler, I.N, & Ramsay, T.B (1981). Preliminary development of a scale of social support: Studies on college students. American Journal of Community Psychology, 9(4), 435–447.
- Beteille, A. (2012). Caste, class and power: changing patterns of stratification in a Tanjore village. Oxford University Press.
10.1093/acprof:oso/9780198077435.001.0001 Google Scholar
- Bhaskar, R. (1979). The possibility of naturalism: A philosophical critique of the contemporary human sciences. London: Routledge.
- Bhaskar, R. (2008). A realist theory of science (Radical Thinkers). London: Verso.
- Bien, W., Marbach, J., & Neyer, F. (1991). Using egocentered networks in survey research. A methodological preview on an application of social network analysis in the area of family research. Social Networks, 13(1), 75–90.
- Borgatti, S. P., Everett, M. G., & Johnson, J. C. (2013). Analyzing social networks. London: SAGE Publications Limited.
- Borgatti, S. P., & Halgin, D. S. (2011). On network theory. Organization Science, 22(5), 1168–1181.
- Breiger, R. L. (1974). The duality of persons and groups. Social Forces, 53, 181–190.
- Burt, R. S. (1984). Network items and the general social survey. Social Networks, 6(4), 293–339.
- Burt, R. S. (2004). Structural holes and good ideas. American Journal of Sociology, 110(2), 349–399.
- Canguilhem, G. (1978). The Normal and the pathological (C. R. Fawcett, trans.). Dordrecht: Reidel.
10.1007/978-94-009-9853-7 Google Scholar
- Caplan, J., Torpey, J. C., & Torpey, J. (Eds.). (2001). Documenting individual identity: The development of state practices in the modern world. Princeton: Princeton University Press.
- Carnap, R. (1969). The logical structure of the world and pseudoproblems in philosophy. California: Open Court Publishing.
- Chambliss, W. J. (2001). Power, politics and crime. Colorado: Westview Press.
- Collier, A. (2004). In defence of objectivity. London: Routledge.
10.4324/9780203615041 Google Scholar
- Comte, A. (1975). Auguste Comte and positivism: The essential writings. New Brunswick: Transaction Publishers.
- Cruickshank, J. (2007). Realism and sociology: Anti-foundationalism, ontology and social research (Vol. 5). London: Routledge.
- Dépelteau, F., & Powell, C. (Eds.). (2013). Applying relational sociology: relations, networks, and society. New York: Palgrave Macmillan.
10.1057/9781137407009 Google Scholar
- DiMaggio, P. (1992). Nadel's paradox revisited: Relational and cultural aspects of organizational structure. Networks and Organizations: Structure, Form, and Action, Pp., 118–142.
- Dirks, N. B. (2011). Castes of mind: Colonialism and the making of modern India. Princeton University Press: Princeton.
- Donati, P., & Archer, M. S. (2015). The relational subject. Cambridge University Press.
10.1017/CBO9781316226780 Google Scholar
- Dumont, L. (1980). Homo hierarchicus: The caste system and its implications. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
- Durkheim, E. (2014). The rules of sociological method: and selected texts on sociology and its method. New York: Simon and Schuster.
- Elder-Vass, D. (2010). The causal power of social structures: Emergence, structure and agency. Cambridge University Press.
10.1017/CBO9780511761720 Google Scholar
- Emirbayer, M. (1997). Manifesto for a relational sociology. American Journal of Sociology, 103(2), 281–317.
- Erikson, E. (2013). Formalist and relationalist theory in social network analysis. Sociological Theory, 31(3), 219–242.
- Etzioni-Halevy, E. (2013). Bureaucracy and Democracy (Routledge Library Editions: Political Science Volume 7). London: Routledge.
10.4324/9780203707890 Google Scholar
- L. C. Freeman, D. R. White, & A. K. Romney (Eds.) (1992). Research methods in social network analysis. Transaction Publishers.
- Fuhse, J., & Mützel, S. (2011). Tackling connections, structure, and meaning in networks: Quantitative and qualitative methods in sociological network research. Quality & Quantity, 45(5), 1067–1089.
- Fuhse, J. A. (2009). The meaning structure of social networks. Sociological Theory, 27(1), 51–73.
- C. J. Fuller (Ed.) (1996). Caste today (p. 1). New Delhi: Oxford University Press.
- Gibson, D. R. (2005). Taking turns and talking ties: Networks and conversational interaction. American Journal of Sociology, 110(6), 1561–1597.
- Gluckman, M. (1960). Tribalism in modern British Central Africa. Cahiers d'études africaines, 1(cahier 1), 55–70.
10.3406/cea.1960.2939 Google Scholar
- Gorski, P. S. (1993). The Protestant ethic revisited: Disciplinary revolution and state formation in Holland and Prussia. American Journal of Sociology, 99(2), 265–316.
- Heritage, J. (2013). Garfinkel and ethnomethodology. Cambridge: John Wiley & Sons.
- Higley, J. (2010). Elite theory and elites. In Handbook of politics (pp. 161–176). New York, NY: Springer.
10.1007/978-0-387-68930-2_9 Google Scholar
- Higley, J., & Burton, M. (2006). Elite foundations of liberal democracy. New York: Rowman & Littlefield Publishers.
- Kertzer, D. I., Arel, D., & Hogan, D. P. (2002). Census and identity: The politics of race, ethnicity, and language in national censuses (Vol. 1). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
- Klineberg, O. (2019). Nationalism and tribalism among African students: A study of social identity (Vol. 12). Paris: Walter de Gruyter GmbH & co KG.
- Knipscheer, K. C., & Antonucci, T. C. (Eds.). (1990). Social Network Research: Substantive Issues and Methodological Research: Workshop: Revised Papers. London: Swets & Zeitlinger.
- Koyré, A. (2013). The astronomical revolution: Copernicus-Kepler-Borelli. London: Routledge.
10.4324/9780203706312 Google Scholar
- Lawson, T. (1997). Economics and reality. Routledge.
10.4324/9780203195390 Google Scholar
- Lecourt, D. (1975). Marxism and epistemology: Bachelard. London: Canguilhem and Foucault.
- Lijphart, A. (1996). The puzzle of Indian democracy: A consociational interpretation. American Political Science Review, 90(2), 258–268.
- Lipset, S. M. (1959). Some social requisites of democracy: Economic development and political legitimacy. American Political Science Review, 53(1), 69–105.
- Loveman, M. (2005). The modern state and the primitive accumulation of symbolic power. American Journal of Sociology, 110(6), 1651–1683.
- Malamat, A. (1973). Tribal societies: Biblical genealogies and African lineage systems. European Journal of Sociology/Archives Européennes de Sociologie, 14(1), 126–136.
- Mamdani, M. (2014). When victims become killers: Colonialism, nativism, and the genocide in Rwanda. Princeton University Press: Princeton.
- Marin, A., & Hampton, K. N. (2007). Simplifying the personal network name generator: Alternatives to traditional multiple and single name generators. Field Methods, 19(2), 163–193.
- Marx, K. (2005). Grundrisse: Foundations of the critique of political economy. London: Penguin.
- McLean, P. D. (1998). A frame analysis of favor seeking in the renaissance: Agency, networks, and political culture. American Journal of Sociology, 104(1) AJSv104, 51–91.
- McLean, P. D. (2017). Culture in networks. Cambridge: Polity Press.
- Mische, A. (2008). Partisan publics: Communication and contention across Brazilian youth activist networks (Vol. 31). Princeton: Princeton University press.
- Mische, A. (2011). Relational sociology, culture, and agency. The sage handbook of social network analysis, 80–97.
- Moore, B. (1993). Social origins of dictatorship and democracy: Lord and peasant in the making of the modern world (Vol. 268). Boston: Beacon press.
- Pachucki, M. A., & Breiger, R. L. (2010). Cultural holes: Beyond relationality in social networks and culture. Annual Review of Sociology, 36, 205–224.
- Perelman, M. (2000). The invention of capitalism: Classical political economy and the secret history of primitive accumulation. Duke University Press.
10.1215/9780822380696 Google Scholar
- Portes, A. (1998). Social capital: Its origins and applications in modern sociology. Annual Review of Sociology, 24(1), 1–24.
- Rook, K. S. (1984). The negative side of social interaction: Impact on psychological well-being. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 46(5), 1097.
- Schumpeter, J. A. (1942). Socialism, capitalism and democracy. New York: Harper and Brothers.
- Scott, J. (1991). Social network analysis. London: Sage.
- Searle, J. R. (1995). The construction of social reality. New York: Simon and Schuster.
- Simmel, G. (1955). Conflict and the web of group affiliations.(trans. By Kurt H. Wolff and Reinhard Bendix).
- Singh, S (2020). What is the Relational Logic of Subjectivity? Insights from Nehru’s Political Habitus for Shifting between Populism and Political Networking. (Under Review).
- Singh, S. (2015). Role of political habitus in shaping dynamics of democracy: Insights from Nehruvian and Gandhian period of democracy in India. Comparative Sociology, 14(5), 682–714.
- Singh, S. (2016a). What is relational structure? Introducing history to the debates on the relation between fields and social networks. Sociological Theory, 34(2), 128–150.
- Singh, S. (2016b). Political field dynamics and the Elite's interest in democracy: Insights from the political Elite's role in consolidating Indian democracy. International Journal of Politics, Culture, and Society, 29(2), 183–208.
- Singh, S. (2016c). Epistemological lacunae in conceptualising political structure: A solution from field theory. European Journal of Cultural and Political Sociology, 3(4), 469–493.
10.1080/23254823.2016.1204930 Google Scholar
- Srinivas, M. N. (1962). Caste in modern India and other essays. Caste in modern India and other essays.
- Van der Poel, M. G. (1993). Delineating personal support networks. Social Networks, 15(1), 49–70.
- Wasserman, S., & Faust, K. (1994). Social network analysis: Methods and applications. (Vol. 8). Cambridge: Cambridge University press.
10.1017/CBO9780511815478 Google Scholar
- Weber, M. (2017). Methodology of social sciences, London: . Routledge.
10.4324/9781315124445 Google Scholar
- Weber, M. (1954). Max Weber on Law in Economy and Society, tr. Max Rheinstein and Edward Shils. Cambridge, Massachusetts: Harvard University Press.
- Wellman, B. (1988). Structural analysis: From method and metaphor to theory and substance. In B. Wellman, & S. D. Berkowitz (Eds.), Social structures: A network approach. Cambridge, England: Cambridge University Press.
- White, H. C. (2008). Identity and control: A structural theory of social action. Princeton University Press: Princeton.
- Yeros, P. (Ed.). (2016). Ethnicity and Nationalism in Africa: Constructivist Reflections and Contemporary Politics. Springer.
- Yeung, K. T. (2005). What does love mean? Exploring network culture in two network settings. Social Forces, 84(1), 391–420.