Taking Metaregulation to the United Nations Human Rights Treaty Regime: The Case of the Convention on the Rights of Persons with Disabilities
Corresponding Author
Sarah Arduin
Address correspondence to Sarah Arduin, University of Dublin Trinity College—Law School, House 39, College Green, Dublin 2, Dublin 2, Ireland. Telephone: +353 86 227 55 94; Email: arduinsa@tcd.ie.Search for more papers by this authorCorresponding Author
Sarah Arduin
Address correspondence to Sarah Arduin, University of Dublin Trinity College—Law School, House 39, College Green, Dublin 2, Dublin 2, Ireland. Telephone: +353 86 227 55 94; Email: arduinsa@tcd.ie.Search for more papers by this authorAbstract
This article argues that regulatory scholarship can be harnessed to promote human rights, in this case the rights of persons with disabilities. It argues that the regulatory regime of the Convention on the Rights of Persons with Disabilities (the Convention) establishes a human rights metaregulatory regime. It shows that the Convention delegates all of the regulatory functions to four different actors, to the effect that no single actor has the full range of regulatory competencies. The implication of this high degree of delegation is that the Convention establishes a three-party framework whereby the interaction between the regulatee and the two regulators is mediated by an oversight body. While organically independent, each actor is functionally interdependent so that an equilibrium is established. At a time where the effectiveness of the UN human rights treaty system is under assault, this article argues that the metaregulatory regime of the CRPD provides an optimistic vision for the future of human rights treaties.
REFERENCES
- Abbott, Kenneth W., and Duncan Snidal. 2011. “ The Governance Triangle: Regulatory Standards Institutions and the Shadow of the State.” In The Politics of Global Regulation, edited by Walter Mattli and Ngaire Woods. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
- Aichele, Vincent. 2018. “ Article 33: National Implementation and Monitoring.” In The UN Convention on the Rights of Persons with Disabilities: A Commentary, edited by Ilias Bantekas, Michael A. Stein and Dimitris Anastasiou. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
- Arduin, Sarah. 2018. “ Article 3: General Principles.” In The UN Convention on the Rights of Persons with Disabilities: A Commentary, edited by Ilias Bantekas, Michael A. Stein, and Dimitris Anastasiou. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
- Arduin, Sarah. 2019. “ Expressive Dimension of the Right to Inclusive Education.” In The Right to Inclusive Education in International Human Rights Law, edited by Gauthier Beco, Shivaun Quinlivan, and Janet E. Lord. Cambridge Disability Law and Policy Series. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
10.1017/9781316392881.007 Google Scholar
- Arnardóttir, Odny M., and Gerard Quinn. 2009. The UN Convention on the Rights of Persons with Disabilities: European and Scandinavian Perspectives. International Studies in Human Rights, vol. 100. Leiden, the Netherlands: Martinus Nijhoff.
- Ayres, Ian, and Braithwaite, John. 1992. Responsive Regulation: Transcending the Deregulation Debate. Oxford Socio-Legal Studies. New York: Oxford University Press.
- Australia. Department of Social Services. 2017. National Disability Strategy 2010–2020. Australian Government Action Plan. https://www.dss.gov.au/sites/default/files/documents/12_2017/final_-_national_disability_strategy_australian_government_action_plan_-_5_dec_2017.pdf.
- Baldwin, Robert, and Julia Black. 2008. “Really Responsive Regulation.” Modern Law Review 71 (1): 59–94.
- Bar-Gill, Oren, and Cass R. Sunstein. 2015. “Regulation as Delegation.” Journal of Legal Analysis 7 (1): 1–36.
- Black, Julia. 2002. “Critical Reflections on Regulation.” Australian Journal of Legal Philosophy 27: 1–36.
- Black, Julia. 2008. “Constructing and Contesting Legitimacy and Accountability in Polycentric Regulatory Regimes.” Regulation and Governance 2 ( 2): 137–64.
- Braithwaite, John. 1982. “Enforced Self-Regulation: A New Strategy for Corporate Crime Control.” Michigan Law Review 80 (7): 1466–507.
- Braithwaite, John. 2000. “The New Regulatory State and the Transformation of Criminology.” British Journal of Criminology 40 (2): 222–38.
- Braithwaite, John. 2011. “The Essence of Responsive Regulation.” University of British Columbia Law Review 44 (3): 475–520.
- Braithwaite, John. 2017. “ Types of Responsiveness.” In Regulatory Theory: Foundations and Applications, edited by Peter Drahos. Acton, Australian Capital Territory: ANU Press.
10.22459/RT.02.2017.07 Google Scholar
- Braithwaite, John, and Drahos, Peter. 2000. Global Business Regulation. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
10.1017/9780521780339 Google Scholar
- Charlesworth, Hilary. 2017. “ A Regulatory Perspective on the International Human Rights System.” In Regulatory Theory: Foundations and Applications, edited by Peter Drahos. Acton, Australian Capital Territory: ANU Press.
10.22459/RT.02.2017.21 Google Scholar
- Coglianese, Cary, and Evan Mendelson. 2012. “ Meta-regulation and Self-Regulation.” In The Oxford Handbook of Regulation, edited by Robert Baldwin, Martin Cave, and Martin Lodge. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
- Coglianese, Cary, and Jennifer Nash. 2010. “ Government Clubs: Theory and Evidence from Voluntary Environmental Programs.” In Voluntary Programs: A Club Theory Perspective, edited by Matthew Potoski and Aseem Prakash. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
- Combrinck, Helene. 2018. “ Article 36: Consideration of Reports.” In The UN Convention on the Rights of Persons with Disabilities: A Commentary, edited by Ilias Bantekas, Michael A. Stein, and Dimitris Anastasiou. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
- Darian-Smith, Eve, and Colin Scott. 2009. “Regulation and Human Rights in Socio-Legal Scholarship.” Law & Policy 31 (3): 271–81.
- De Búrca, Gráinne. 2009. “The EU in the Negotiation of the UN Disability Convention.” European Law Review 35 (2): 174–96.
- De Búrca, Gráinne, Robert O. Keohane, and Charles Sabel. 2012. “New Modes of Pluralist Global Governance.” New York University Journal of International Law and Policy 45 (3): 723–86.
- Drahos, Peter. 2017. Regulatory Theory: Foundations and Applications. Acton, Australian Capital Territory: ANU Press.
10.22459/RT.02.2017 Google Scholar
- Drahos, Peter, and Martin Krygier. 2017. “ Regulation, Institutions and Networks.” In Regulatory Theory, edited by Peter Drahos. Acton, Australian Capital Territory: ANU Press.
10.22459/RT.02.2017.01 Google Scholar
- Dworkin, Ronald. 1977. Taking Rights Seriously. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
- European Union Fundamental Rights Agency. 2017. “Developments in the Implementation of the Convention on the Rights of Persons with Disabilities.” In Fundamental Rights Report, Chapter 9. http://fra.europa.eu/en/publications-and-resources/publications/annual-reports/fundamental-rights-2017.
- Flynn, Eilionóir. 2011. From Rhetoric to Action: Implementing the UN Convention on the Rights of Persons with Disabilities. Cambridge Disability Law and Policy Series. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
10.1017/CBO9780511996405 Google Scholar
- Gilad, Sharon. 2010. “It Runs in the Family: Meta-regulation and Its Siblings.” Regulation and Governance 4 (4): 485–506.
- Grabosky, Peter. 1995. “Using Non-governmental Resources to Foster Regulatory Compliance.” Governance 8 (4): 527–50.
- Grabosky, Peter. 2017. “ Meta-regulation.” In Regulatory Theory, edited by Peter Drahos. Acton, Australian Capital Territory: ANU Press.
10.22459/RT.02.2017.09 Google Scholar
- Hafner-Burton, Emilie M. 2005. “Trading Human Rights: How Preferential Trade Arrangements Influence Government Repression.” International Organization 59 (3): 593–629.
- Hafner-Burton, Emilie M. 2008. “Sticks and Stones: Naming and Shaming the Human Rights Enforcement Problem.” International Organization 62 (4): 689–716.
- Hafner-Burton, Emilie M., and Kiyoteru Tsutsui. 2007. “Justice Lost! The Failure of International Human Rights Law to Matter Where Needed Most.” Journal of Peace Research 44 (4): 407–25.
- Hathaway, Oona A. 2002. “Do Human Rights Treaties Make a Difference?” The Yale Law Journal 111 (8): 1935–2042.
- Hendrix, Cullen, and Wendy H. Wong. 2013. “When Is the Pen Truly Mighty? Regime Type and the Efficacy of Naming and Shaming in Curbing Human Rights Abuses.” British Journal of Political Science 43 (3): 651–72.
- Heyer, Katharina. 2015. Rights Enabled: The Disability Revolution, from the US, to Germany and Japan, to the United Nations. Ann Arbor: University of Michigan Press.
10.3998/mpub.5946811 Google Scholar
- Hood, Christopher, Colin Scott, Oliver James, George Jones, and Tony Travers. 1999. Regulation inside Government. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
10.1093/0198280998.001.0001 Google Scholar
- Hood, Christopher, Henry Rothstein, and Robert Baldwin. 2001. The Government of Risk: Understanding Risk Regulation Regime. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
10.1093/0199243638.001.0001 Google Scholar
- Johnstone, Rachael Lorna. 2007. “Cynical Savings or Reasonable Reform? Reflections on a Single Unified UN Human Rights Treaty Body.” Human Rights Law Review 7 (1): 173–200.
10.1093/hrlr/ngl021 Google Scholar
- Kanter, Arlene S. 2014. The Development of Disability Rights under International Law: From Charity to Human Rights. New York: Routledge.
10.4324/9780203711712 Google Scholar
- Kanter, Arlene S. 2018. “ Article 35: Reports by States Parties.” In The UN Convention on the Rights of Persons with Disabilities: A Commentary, edited by Ilias Bantekas, Michael A. Stein, and Dimitris Anastasiou. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
- Kaplow, Louis. 1992. “Rules versus Standards: An Economic Analysis.” Duke Law Journal 42: 557–629.
- Levi-Faur, David. 2011. “ Regulation and Regulatory Governance.” In Handbook on the Politics of Regulation, edited by David Levi-Faur. Cheltenham, UK: Edward Elgar Publishing.
- Lord, Janet. 2009. “ Disability Rights and the Human Rights Mainstream: Reluctant Gatecrashers?” In The International Struggle for New Human Rights, edited by Clifford Bob. Pennsylvania Studies in Human Rights. Philadelphia: University of Pennsylvania Press.
- McDougal, Myres S., and Gerhard Bebr. 1964. “Human Rights in the United Nations.” American Journal of International Law 58 (3): 603–41.
- Melish, Tara. 2007. “The UN Disability Convention: Historic Process, Strong Prospects, and Why the US Should Ratify.” Human Rights Brief 14 (2): 43–47.
- Melish, Tara. 2014. “ An Eye toward Effective Enforcement: A Technical-Comparative Approach to the CRPD Negotiations.” In Human Rights and Disability Advocacy, edited by Maya Sabatello and Marianne Schulze. Pennsylvania Studies in Human Rights. Philadelphia: University of Pennsylvania Press.
- Morgan, Bronwen. 1999. “Regulating the Regulators: Meta-regulation as a Strategy for Reinventing Government in Australia.” Public Management: An International Journal of Research and Theory 1 ( 1): 49–66.
10.1080/14719037800000004 Google Scholar
- Morgan, Bronwen. 2003. Social Citizenship in the Shadow of Competition: The Bureaucratic Politics of Regulatory Justification. Aldershot, UK: Ashgate Publishing.
- Morgan, Bronwen. 2008. The Intersection of Rights and Regulation: New Directions in Sociolegal Scholarship. Farnham, UK: Ashgate Publishing.
- Narlikar, Amrita, M. J. Daunton, and Robert M. Stern. 2012. The Oxford Handbook on the World Trade Organization. New York: Oxford University Press.
- OECD. 2018. OECD Regulatory Policy Outlook 2018. Paris: OECD Publishing.
10.1787/9789264303072-en Google Scholar
- Office of the High Commissioner for Human Rights. 2012. The UN Human Rights Treaty System Fact Sheet. Number 30/Review 1. New York: United Nations.
- Parker, Christine. 2002. The Open Corporation: Effective Self-Regulation and Democracy. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
10.1017/CBO9780511550034 Google Scholar
- Parker, Christine. 2007. “ Meta-regulation: Legal Accountability for Corporate Social Responsibility?” In The New Corporate Accountability: Corporate Social Responsibility and the Law, edited by Doreen McBarnet, Aurora Voiculescu, and Tom Campbell. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
- Pegram, Tom. 2015. “Global Human Rights Governance and Orchestration: National Human Rights Institutions as Intermediaries.” European Journal of International Relations 21 (3): 595–620.
- Posner, Eric A. 2014. The Twilight of Human Rights Law. New York: Oxford University Press.
- Quinn, Gerard, Theresia Degener, and Anna Bruce. 2002. Human Rights and Disability: The Current Use and Future Potential of United Nations Human Rights Instruments in the Context of Disability. United Nations Publications. New York: United Nations.
- Raustiala, Kal. 2011. “ The Role of NGOs in International Treaty-Making.” In Oxford Guide to Treaties, edited by Duncan Hollis. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
- Scott, Colin. 2004. “ Regulation in the Age of Governance: The Rise of the Post Regulatory State.” In The Politics of Regulation: Institutions and Regulatory Reforms for the Age of Governance, edited by Jacint Jordana and David Levi-Faur. CRC Series on Competition, Regulation and Development. Cheltenham, UK: Edward Elgar.
10.4337/9781845420673.00016 Google Scholar
- Scott, Colin. 2017. “ The Regulatory State and Beyond.” In Regulatory Theory, edited by Peter Drahos. Australian Capital Territory: ANU Press.
10.22459/RT.02.2017.16 Google Scholar
- Stein, Michael Ashley. 2007. “Disability Human Rights.” California Law Review 95 (1): 75–121.
- Stein, Michael Ashley, and Janet Lord. 2010. “Monitoring the Convention on the Rights of Persons with Disabilities: Innovations, Lost Opportunities, and Future Potential.” Human Rights Quarterly 32 (3): 689–728.
- Sunstein, Cass. 1988. “Beyond the Republican Revival.” Yale Law Journal 97 (8): 1539–90.
- Sunstein Cass. 1995. “Problems with Rules.” California Law Review 83 (4): 953–1026.
- Sunstein, Cass, and Edna Ullmann-Margalit. 1999. “Second-Order Decisions.” Ethics 110 (1): 5–31.
- UN Committee on the Rights of Persons with Disabilities. 2009. Guidelines on Treaty-Specific Document to Be Submitted by States Parties under Article 35, Paragraph 1, of the Convention on the Rights of Persons with Disabilities. UN Doc CRPD/C/2/3.
- UN Committee on the Rights of Persons with Disabilities. 2010. Initial Reports of States Parties. Spain. UN Doc. CRPD/C/ESP/1.
- UN Committee on the Rights of Persons with Disabilities. 2011. Working Methods of the Committee on the Rights of Persons with Disabilities Adopted at Its Fifth Session. UN Doc CRPD/C/5/4.d.
- UN Committee on the Rights of Persons with Disabilities. 2013a. Concluding Observations on the Initial Report of Austria. UN Doc. CRPD/C/AUT/CO/1.
- UN Committee on the Rights of Persons with Disabilities. 2013b. Initial Reports of States Parties. Germany. UN Doc. CRPD/C/DEU/1.
- UN Committee on the Rights of Persons with Disabilities. 2013c. Initial Reports of States Parties. New Zealand. UN Doc. CRPD/C/NZL/1.
- UN Committee on the Rights of Persons with Disabilities. 2013d. Initial Reports of States Parties. United Kingdom and Northern Ireland. UN Doc. CRPD/C/GBR/1.
- UN Committee on the Rights of Persons with Disabilities. 2014. Guidelines, Report on Its Twelfth Session. UN Doc CRPD/C/12/2. https://digitallibrary.un.org/record/791718/files/CRPD_C_12_2-EN.pdf.
- UN Committee on the Rights of Persons with Disabilities. 2015. Concluding Observations on the Initial Report of the European Union. CRPD/C/EU/CO/1.
- UN Committee on the Rights of Persons with Disabilities. 2016a. Concluding Observations on the Initial Report of Serbia. UN Doc. CRPD/C/SRB/CO/1.
- UN Committee on the Rights of Persons with Disabilities. 2016b. Concluding Observations on the Initial Report of Lithuania. UN Doc. CRPD/C/LTU/CO/1.
- UN Committee on the Rights of Persons with Disabilities. 2016c. Concluding Observations on the Initial Report of Italy. CRPD/C/ITA/CO/1.
- UN Committee on the Rights of Persons with Disabilities. 2016d. Guidelines on Independent Monitoring Frameworks and Their Participation in the Work of the Committee on the Rights of Persons with Disabilities. UN Doc CRPD/C/1/Rev. 1 Annex.
- UN Committee on the Rights of Persons with Disabilities. 2018. General Comment No. 7 on the Participation of Persons with Disabilities, Including Children with Disabilities, through Their Representative Organizations, in the Implementation and Monitoring of the Convention. UN Doc. CRPD/C/GC/7.
- UN General Assembly. 2002. Report of the Ad Hoc Committee on a Comprehensive and Integral International Convention on Protection and Promotion of the Rights and Dignity of Persons with Disabilities. UN Doc. A/57/357. http://static.un.org/esa/socdev/enable/rights/adhoca57357e.htm.
- UN General Assembly. 2006. Convention on the Rights of Persons with Disabilities. Resolution / Adopted by the General Assembly. A/RES/61/106.
- UN General Assembly. 2014. Strengthening and Enhancing the Effective Functioning of the Human Rights Treaty Body System. Resolution / Adopted by the General Assembly. A/RES/68/268. https://www.ohchr.org/Documents/HRBodies/TB/HRTD/A-RES-68-268_E.pdf.
- UN Human Rights Commission. 1992. Principles Relating to the Status and Functioning of National Institutions for the Promotion and Protection of Human Rights. Resolution 1992/54.
- UN Secretary-General. 2006. Press Release, December 13, SG/SM/10797, HR/4911, L/T/4400. http://www.un.org/News/Press/docs/2006/sgsm10797.doc.htm.
- UN Secretary-General. 2018. 30th Meeting of Chairs of the Human Rights Treaty Bodies. Secretariat, HRI/MC/2018/2.
- United Nations. 2010. National Human Rights Institutions: History, Principles, Roles and Responsibilities. Professional Training Series, No. 4/Review 1. New York: United Nations.