Regional cooperation and benefit sharing for sustainable water resources management in the Lower Mekong Basin
Corresponding Author
Serey Sok
Royal University of Phnom Penh, Phnom Penh, Cambodia
Correspondence
Serey Sok, Royal University of Phnom Penh, Phnom Penh, Cambodia.
Email: sok.serey@rupp.edu.kh
Search for more papers by this authorSopheak Meas
Keizo Obuchi Research Fellowships Program, UNESCO, Phnom Penh, Cambodia
Search for more papers by this authorSophearin Chea
Consortium of Civil Society Organizations, Social Accountability Program, Phnom Penh, Cambodia
Search for more papers by this authorNyda Chhinh
Department of Economic Development, Royal University of Phnom Penh, Phnom Penh, Cambodia
Search for more papers by this authorCorresponding Author
Serey Sok
Royal University of Phnom Penh, Phnom Penh, Cambodia
Correspondence
Serey Sok, Royal University of Phnom Penh, Phnom Penh, Cambodia.
Email: sok.serey@rupp.edu.kh
Search for more papers by this authorSopheak Meas
Keizo Obuchi Research Fellowships Program, UNESCO, Phnom Penh, Cambodia
Search for more papers by this authorSophearin Chea
Consortium of Civil Society Organizations, Social Accountability Program, Phnom Penh, Cambodia
Search for more papers by this authorNyda Chhinh
Department of Economic Development, Royal University of Phnom Penh, Phnom Penh, Cambodia
Search for more papers by this authorAbstract
Benefit sharing is a concept associated with regional cooperation for sustainable water resources management. To this end, the present study analyses how implementation of this concept may contribute to economic growth and the promotion of sustainable livelihoods in the Lower Mekong Basin (LMB). It focuses on the balance between economic and human development, national interests, and the procedures used to manage water resources in the basin. It was found that: (a) Benefits obtained from the Mekong River are not equally shared between riparian countries because of inadequate regional cooperation, with economic and social development in the LMB being uneven, with Thailand and Vietnam achieving better human development, poverty reduction and food security outcomes than Laos and Cambodia; (b) Lack of shared national interests, or a common development agenda, has resulted in unsustainable water resource management outcomes; and (c) Procedures for water resources management agreed by the four LMB countries are well-aligned with the conceptual framework for benefit sharing defined by Sadoff and Grey (2002, Water Policy, 4, 389), although while these procedures have the potential to facilitate a more cooperative agenda for equitable sharing of social, economic and environmental benefits from the water resources of the Mekong River, implementation of the 1995 Mekong Agreement currently remains controversial. The five procedures for water resource management developed by the Mekong River Commission have not resulted in satisfactory outcomes, due in part to the institution lacking regulatory authority.
REFERENCES
- ASEAN Secretariat (2018a) SME Policy Index ASEAN 2018. Boosting competitiveness and inclusive growth. Jakarta, Indonesia: ASEAN Secretariat.
- ASEAN Secretariat (2018b). ASEAN statistical leaflet 2018. Jakarta, Indonesia: ASEAN Secretariat.
- ASEAN Secretariat (2018c). ASEAN statistical highlights 2018. Jakarta, Indonesia: ASEAN Secretariat.
- Baran, E., Larinier, M., Ziv, G., & Marmulla, G. (2011) Review of the Fish and Fisheries Aspects in the Feasibility Study and the Environmental Impact Assessment of the Proposed Xayaburi Dam on the Mekong Mainstream. Gland: Worldwide Fund for Nature.
- Baran, E., Starr, P., & Kura, Y. (Eds.) (2007). Influence of built structures on Tonle Sap fisheries – synthesis report. Phnom Penh, Cambodia: WorldFish Center, Penang.
- Beilfuss, R., & Triet, T. (2014) Scoping study on Climate change and hydropower in the Mekong River Basin: A synthesis of research. Bonn, Germany: Deutsche Gesellschaft für and Internationale Zusammenarbeit (GIZ) GmbH.
- Biba, S. (2018). China's ‘old’ and ‘new’ Mekong River politics: The Lancang-Mekong Cooperation from a comparative benefit-sharing perspective. Water International, 1–20.
- Bravard, J. P., Goichot, M., & Tronchère, H. (2014). An assessment of sediment-transport processes in the Lower Mekong River based on deposit grain sizes, the CM technique and flow-energy data. Geomorphology, 207, 174–189. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.geomorph.2013.11.004
- Browder, G., & Ortolano, L. (2000). The evolution of an international water resources management regime in the Mekong river basin. Natural Resources Journal, 499–531.
- Campbell, I. C. (2016). Integrated management in the Mekong River Basin. Ecohydrology and Hydrobiology, 16(4), 255–262. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecohyd.2016.09.003
- Cernea, M. (2007). Financing for development: Benefit-sharing mechanisms in population resettlement. Economic and Political Weekly, 42(12), 1033–1046.
- Chen, H., Rieu-Clarke, A., & Wouters, P. (2013). Exploring China's transboundary water treaty practice through the prism of the UN Watercourses Convention. Water International, 38(2), 217–230. https://doi.org/10.1080/02508060.2013.782134
- Choi, S. J., & Lee, S. H. (2014). Patterns of international relations on hydropower development in the Mekong River Basin. 평화연구, 22(1), 389–434.
- Dosch, J., & Hensengerth, O. (2005). Sub-regional cooperation in Southeast Asia: The Mekong basin. European Journal of East Asian Studies, 4(2), 263–286. https://doi.org/10.1163/157006105774711422
10.1163/157006105774711422 Google Scholar
- FAO (2016) Country Briefs. Retrieved from http://www.fao.org/giews/countrybrief/country.jsp?code=KHM on March 1, 2017.
- Fisheries Office (2009) A study of the downstream impacts of the Yali Falls Dam in the Se San River Basin in Ratanakiri Province, Northeast Cambodia. Ratanakiri, Cambodia: Fisheries Office and Non-Timber Forest Products (NTFP) Project, Ratanakiri Province.
- Friend, R., Arthur, R., & Keskinen, M. (2009). Songs of the doomed: the continuing neglect of capture fisheries in hydropower development in the Mekong. Contested waterscapes in the Mekong region: Hydropower, livelihoods and governance, 307-332.
- Ganjanakhundee, S. (2012). Laos: No work on Xayaburi dam until green concerns solved. The Nation, 4. Retrieved from http://www.nationthailand.com/national/30181251
- Grimsditch, M. (2012). Understanding new threats and challenges from hydropower development to biodiversity and community rights in the 3S River Basin. Ratanakiri, Cambodia: 3S Rivers Protection Network.
- Grumbine, R. E. (2018). Using transboundary environmental security to manage the Mekong River: China and South-East Asian Countries. International Journal of Water Resources Development, 34(5), 792–811. https://doi.org/10.1080/07900627.2017.1348938
- Ha, M. -L. (2011). The role of regional institutions in sustainable development: a review of the Mekong River commission’s first 15 years. Consilience: The Journal of Sustainable Development, 5(1), 125–140.
- Ha, T. T. T., van Dijk, H., & Bush, R. S. (2012). Mangrove conservation or shrimp farmer's livelihood? The devolution of forest management and benefit sharing in the Mekong Delta, Vietnam. Ocean and Coastal Management, 69, 185–193. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ocecoaman.2012.07.034
- Haefner, A. (2013). Regional environmental security: Cooperation and challenges in the Mekong subregion. Global Change, Peace and Security, 25(1), 27–41. https://doi.org/10.1080/14781158.2013.758099
10.1080/14781158.2013.758099 Google Scholar
- Han, H. (2017). China, an upstream hegemon: A destabilizer for the governance of the Mekong river? Pacific Focus, 32(1), 30–55. https://doi.org/10.1111/pafo.12085
- Hang, N. T., & When, U. (2016). Data sharing in international transboundary contexts: The Vietnamese perspective on data sharing in the Lower Mekong Basin. Journal of Hydrology, 536, 351–364.
- Hirsch, P. (2010). The changing political dynamics of dam building on the mekong. Water Alternatives, 3 (2), 312–323.
- Hirsch, P. (2016). The shifting regional geopolitics of Mekong dams. Political Geography, 51, 63–74. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.polgeo.2015.12.004
- Ho, S. (2014). River politics: China's policies in the Mekong and the Brahmaputra in comparative perspective. Journal of Contemporary China, 23(85), 1–20. https://doi.org/10.1080/10670564.2013.809974
- Hortle, K. G., & Bamrungrach, P. (2015). Fisheries Habitat and Yield in the Lower Mekong Basin. Phnom Penh, Cambodia: Mekong River Commission.
- Hunt, L. (2016). Mekong river commission faces radical change. The Diplomat, 22. Retrieved from https://thediplomat.com/2016/01/mekong-river-commission-faces-radical-change/
- Jacobs, J. W. (2002). The Mekong River Commission: Transboundary water resources planning and regional security. Geographical Journal, 168(4), 354–364. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.0016-7398.2002.00061.x
- Lebel, L., Lebel, P., Chitmanat, C., & Sriyasak, P. (2014). Benefit sharing from hydropower watersheds: Rationales, practices, and potential. Water Resources and Rural Development, 4, 12–28. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.wrr.2014.10.006
10.1016/j.wrr.2014.10.006 Google Scholar
- Lee, S. (2013). Hydropower development in the Mekong River Basin–analysis through the hydrohegemony approach. Southeast Asia Research, 23(1), 227–264.
- Lee, S. (2015). Benefit sharing in the Mekong River basin. Water International, 40(1), 139–152. https://doi.org/10.1080/02508060.2014.978974
- Li, X. (2012). Hydropower in the Mekong river basin: A balancing test. Environmental Claims Journal, 24(1), 51–69. https://doi.org/10.1080/10406026.2012.663299
- Luttrell, C., Loft, L., Gebara, M. F., Kweka, D., Brockhaus, M., Angelsen, A., & Sunderlin, W. D. (2013). Who should benefit from REDD+? Rationales and realities Ecology Society, 18(4), 52. https://doi.org/10.5751/ES-05834-180452
- McIntyre, O. (2015). Benefit-sharing and upstream/downstream cooperation for ecological protection of transboundary waters: Opportunities for China as an upstream state. Water International, 40(1), 48–70. https://doi.org/10.1080/02508060.2014.990350
- Mehta, L. (2007). Whose scarcity? Whose property? The case of water in western India. Land Use Policy, 24(4), 654–663. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.landusepol.2006.05.009
- Minh, N. L. (2008). Hanging in balance: Benefit sharing in community based fishery resource management in the Lower Mekong Basin. Local Environment, 13(5), 437–448. https://doi.org/10.1080/13549830701809767
10.1080/13549830701809767 Google Scholar
- MoNRE (2013) Long-term vision and strategy for a safe, prosperous and sustainable delta. Hanoi, Vietnam: Ministry of Natural Resources and Environment.
- MRC (1995). Agreement on the cooperation for the sustainable development of the Mekong River Basin. Vientiane, Laos: Mekong River Commission.
- MRC (2002) Annual Report 2001. Phnom Penh, Cambodia: MRC. Retrieved from http://www.mrcmekong.org/annual_report/annual_report.htm
- MRC (2010). State of the basin report. Vientiane, Laos: Mekong River Commission.
- MRC (2011). Knowledge based on benefit sharing. Vientiane, Laos: Mekong River Commission.
- MRC (2015a). 20 Years of cooperation – mekong river commission. Vientiane, Laos: Mekong River Commission.
- MRC (2015b). 20 years of cooperation. Vientiane, Laos: Mekong River Commission.
- MRC (2017). Statement on prior consultation process for the Pak Beng Hydropower Project in Lao PDR. Vientiane, Laos: Mekong River Commission.
- MRC (29 Aug. 2018a). Pak Lay hydropower project. Retrieved from http://www.mrcmek ong.org/topics/pnpca-prior-consultation/pak-lay-hydropower-project/
- MRC (2018b) Linking the MRC Procedures in Support of Mekong Water Diplomacy (Draft V1.0): A handbook (2018). 20 Years of Cooperation - Mekong River Commission. Vientiane: Mekong River Commission.
- MRC (2018c). Summary note. Review report on joint environmental monitoring (JEM) activities and recommendations for Mekong mainstream hydropower projects (Draft). Vientiane, Laos: Mekong River Commission.
- MRC & MWR (2016). Technical Report –Joint Observation and Evaluation of the Emergency Water Supplement from China to the Mekong River. Vientiane, Laos: Mekong River Commission and Ministry of Water Resources of the People's Republic of China.
- Pearse-Smith, S. W. D. (2012). Water war’ in the Mekong Basin? Asia Pacific Viewpoint, 53(2), 147–162. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-8373.2012.01484.x
- Phillips, D. J. H., & Woodhouse, M. (2009). Benefit sharing in the Nile River Basin: Emerging strategies for fresh water use at the country and selected sub- Basin Levels, as revealed by the trans-boundary waters opportunity analysis. Windhoek, Namibia: Phillips Robinson and Associates.
- Phomsouvanh, A., Saphakdy, B., & De Silva, S. S. (2015). Production trends, monetary returns and benefit sharing protocols from the extensive aquaculture practice of culture-based fisheries in rural communities in Lao PDR. Aquaculture, 439, 29–38. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.aquaculture.2015.01.022
- Pomfret, R. (2013). ASEAN's new frontiers: Integrating the newest members into the ASEAN economic community. Asian Economic Policy Review, 8(1), 25–41. https://doi.org/10.1111/aepr.12000
- Pöyry (2011). Government of Laos Xayaburi hydropower compliance report. Zurich, Switzerland: Pöyry Energy.
- Radosevich, G. E., & Olson, C. D. (1999). Existing and emerging basin arrangements in Asia: Mekong River Commission case study. Paper presented at the Third Workshop on River Basin Institution Development. Retrieved http://siteresources.worldbank.org/INTWRD/918599-11126159431 68/20 431963/
- Ratner, B. D. (2003). The politics of regional governance in the Mekong River Basin. Global Change, Peace and Security, 15(1), 59–76. https://doi.org/10.1080/0951274032000044522
10.1080/0951274032000044522 Google Scholar
- Reilly, J. (2012). A norm-taker or a norm-maker? Chinese aid in Southeast Asia. Journal of Contemporary China, 21(73), 71–91. https://doi.org/10.1080/10670564.2012.627667
- Ringler, C., von Braun, J., & Rosegrant, M. W. (2004). Water policy analysis for the Mekong River Basin. Water International, 29(1), 30–42. https://doi.org/10.1080/02508060408691746
- Sadoff, C., & Grey, D. (2002). Beyond the river: The benefits of cooperation on international rivers. Water Policy, 4(5), 389–403. https://doi.org/10.1016/S1366-7017(02)00035-1
10.1016/S1366-7017(02)00035-1 Google Scholar
- Sarkkula, J., Keskinen, M., Koponen, J., Kummu, M., Richey, J. E., & Varis, O. (2009). Hydropower in the Mekong region: what are the likely impacts upon fisheries?Contested waterscapes in the Mekong Region: Hydropower, livelihoods and governance, 227-252.
- Schmeier, S. (2009). Regional cooperation efforts in the Mekong river basin: Mitigating river-related security threats and promoting regional development. Austrian Journal for Southeast Asian Studies, 2(2), 28–52.
- Shicavone, A. (2010). Trade and climate change implications for food security in mainland Southeast Asia. International Institute for Sustainable Development (IISD), Winnipeg.
- Sneddon, C., & Fox, C. (2006). Rethinking transboundary waters: A critical hydropolitics of the Mekong basin. Political Geography, 25(2), 181–202. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.polgeo.2005.11.002
- Statista, Inc (2016). Principal rice exporting countries worldwide in 2015/2016. Retrieved from https://www.statista.com/statistics/255947/top-rice-exporting-countries-worldwide-2011/
- Suhardiman, D., Wichelns, D., Lebel, L., & Sellamuttu, S. S. (2014). Benefit sharing in Mekong Region hydropower: Whose benefits count? Water Resources and Rural Development, 4, 3–11. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.wrr.2014.10.008
10.1016/j.wrr.2014.10.008 Google Scholar
- The Economist (2018). The global food security index. Building resilience in the face of rising food security risks. London, UK: The Economist.
- Thompson, J. R., Laizé, C. L. R., Green, A. J., Acreman, M. C., & Kingston, D. G. (2014). Climate change uncertainty in environmental flows for the Mekong River. Hydrological Sciences Journal, 59(3–4), 935–954. https://doi.org/10.1080/02626667.2013.842074
- Turton, A. (2008). Reflections from South Africa on a possible benefit-sharing paradigm for trans-boundary waters (p. 19). Pretoria, South Africa: CSIR.
- Ty, P. H., van Westen, A., & Zoomers, A. (2013). Compensation and resettlement policies after compulsory land acquisition for hydropower development in Vietnam. Policy and Practice, Land, 2(4), 678–704.
- UNDP (2018). Human development indices and indicators: 2018 statistical update. New York, NY: United Nations Development Programme.
- Wang, P., Lassoie, J. P., Dong, S., & Morreale, S. J. (2013). A framework for social impact analysis of large dams: A case study of cascading dams on the Upper-Mekong River, China. Journal Environmental Management, 117, 131–140. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jenvman.2012.12.045
- Wichelns, D. (2014). Sharing the benefits of hydropower: Co-investing the economic rents. Water Resources and Rural Development, 4, 29–39. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.wrr.2014.10.002
10.1016/j.wrr.2014.10.002 Google Scholar
- WLE Greater Mekong (2015) Dams in the Mekong Basin. Retrieved from https://wlemekong.cgiar.org/wpcontent/uploads/A4_Mekong_Dams_2015.pdf on March 1, 2017.
- World Bank (2018a). Cambodia economic update, april 2018: Recent economic developments and outlook. Phnom Penh, Cambodia: World Bank.
10.1596/29811 Google Scholar
- World Bank (2018b). Taking stock. An update on Vietnam's recent economic developments. Hanoi, Vietnam: World Bank.
10.1596/29959 Google Scholar
- World Bank (2018c). Lao PDR economic monitor, June 2018: safeguarding stability – an ongoing agenda. Washington, DC: World Bank.
10.1596/29920 Google Scholar
- World Bank (2018d). Thailand economic monitor: Beyond the innovation paradox. Bangkok, Thailand: World Bank.
10.1596/30247 Google Scholar
- World Bank (2018e) World bank open data. Retrieved from https://data.worldbank.org/