Lifetime investment and consumption with recursive preferences and small transaction costs
Yaroslav Melnyk
SFI, EPFL, Quartier UNIL-Dorigny, Lausanne, Switzerland
Search for more papers by this authorCorresponding Author
Johannes Muhle-Karbe
Department of Mathematics, Imperial College London, London, UK
Correspondence
Johannes Muhle-Karbe, Department of Mathematics, Imperial College London, South Kensington Campus, London SW7 2AZ, UK.
Email: j.muhle-karbe@imperial.ac.uk
Search for more papers by this authorFrank Thomas Seifried
Department of Mathematics, University of Trier, Trier, Germany
Search for more papers by this authorYaroslav Melnyk
SFI, EPFL, Quartier UNIL-Dorigny, Lausanne, Switzerland
Search for more papers by this authorCorresponding Author
Johannes Muhle-Karbe
Department of Mathematics, Imperial College London, London, UK
Correspondence
Johannes Muhle-Karbe, Department of Mathematics, Imperial College London, South Kensington Campus, London SW7 2AZ, UK.
Email: j.muhle-karbe@imperial.ac.uk
Search for more papers by this authorFrank Thomas Seifried
Department of Mathematics, University of Trier, Trier, Germany
Search for more papers by this authorFunding information:
German Academic Exchange Service (DAAD) and the European Research Council under the European Union's Seventh Framework Programme (FP/2007-2013)/ERC Grant Agreement n. 307465-POLYTE, and Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft within the Research Training Group 2126; CFM-Imperial Institute of Quantitative Finance.
Abstract
We investigate the effects of small proportional transaction costs on lifetime consumption and portfolio choice. The extant literature has focused on agents with additive utilities. Here, we extend this analysis to the archetype of nonadditive preferences: the isoelastic recursive utilities proposed by Epstein and Zin.
REFERENCES
- Beneš, V. E., Shepp, L. A., & Witsenhausen, H. S. (1980). Some solvable stochastic control problems. Stochastics, 4(1), 39–83.
10.1080/17442508008833156 Google Scholar
- Bichuch, M. (2012). Asymptotic analysis for optimal investment in finite time with transaction costs. SIAM Journal on Financial Mathematics, 3(1), 433–458.
- Bichuch, M. (2014). Pricing a contingent claim liability using asymptotic analysis for optimal investment in finite time with transaction costs. Finance and Stochastics, 18(3), 651–694.
- Buss, A., Uppal, R., & Vilkov, G. (2013). Asset prices in general equilibrium with recursive utility and illiquidity induced by transactions costs. INSEAD Working Paper No. 2014/01/FIN.
- Chacko, G., & Viceira, L. M. (2005). Dynamic consumption and portfolio choice with stochastic volatility in incomplete markets. Review of Financial Studies, 18(4), 1369–1402.
- Choi, J. H. (2014). Asymptotic analysis for Merton's problem with transaction costs in power utility case. Stochastics, 84(5), 803–816.
10.1080/17442508.2013.879142 Google Scholar
- Davis, M. H. A., & Norman, A. R. (1990). Portfolio selection with transaction costs. Mathematics of Operations Research, 21(4), 676–713.
- Duffie, D., & Epstein, L. G. (1992). Stochastic differential utility. Econometrica, 60(2), 353–394.
- Dumas, B. (1991). Super contact and related optimality conditions. Journal of Economic Dynamics and Control, 15(4), 675–685.
- Dupuis, P., & Ishii, H. (1993). SDEs with oblique reflection on nonsmooth domains. Annals of Probability, 21(1), 554–580.
- Epstein, L. G., & Zin, S. E. (1989). Substitution, risk aversion and the temporal behavior of consumption and asset returns: A theoretical framework. Econometrica, 57(4), 937–969.
- Gerhold, S., Guasoni, P., Muhle-Karbe, J., & Schachermayer, W. (2014). Transaction costs, trading volume, and the liquidity premium. Finance and Stochastics, 18(1), 1–37.
- Gerhold, S., Muhle-Karbe, J., & Schachermayer, W. (2012). Asymptotics and duality for the Davis and Norman problem. Stochastics, 84(5–6), 625–641.
10.1080/17442508.2011.619699 Google Scholar
- Gerhold, S., Muhle-Karbe, J., & Schachermayer, W. (2013). The dual optimizer for the growth-optimal portfolio under transaction costs. Finance and Stochastics, 17(2), 325–354.
- Hu, Y., & Schweizer, M. (2011). Some new BSDE results for an infinite-horizon stochastic control problem. In G. D. Nunno & B. Øksendal (Eds.), Advanced mathematical methods for finance (pp. 367–395). Berlin: Springer.
10.1007/978-3-642-18412-3_14 Google Scholar
- Ilyashenko, Y., & Yakovenko, S. (2008). Lectures on analytic differential equations, volume 86 of Graduate studies in mathematics. Providence, RI: American Mathematical Society.
- Janeček, K., & Shreve, S. E. (2004). Asymptotic analysis for optimal investment and consumption with transaction costs. Finance and Stochastics, 8(2), 181–206.
- Jang, B.-G., Koo, H. K., & Lee, S. (2015). Liquidation shocks and transaction costs. SSRN Working Paper.
- Kaup, L., & Kaup, B. (1983). Holomorphic functions of several variables: An Introduction to the fundamental theory. de Gruyter Studies in Mathematics. Berlin: de Gruyter.
- Kraft, H., Seiferling, T., & Seifried, F. T. (2017). Optimal consumption and investment with Epstein–Zin recursive utility. Finance and Stochastics, 21(1), 187–226.
- Kraft, H., & Seifried, F. T. (2014). Stochastic differential utility as the continuous-time limit of recursive utility. Journal of Economic Theory, 151, 528–550.
- Magill, M. J. P., & Constantinides, G. M. (1976). Portfolio selection with transactions costs. Journal of Economic Theory, 13(2), 245–263.
- Melnyk, Y., & Seifried, F. T. (2018). Small-cost asymptotics for long-term growth rates in incomplete markets. Mathematical Finance, 28(2), 668–711.
- Muhle-Karbe, J., Reppen, M., & Soner, H. M. (2017). A primer on portfolio choice with small transaction costs. Annual Review of Financial Economics, 9, 301–331.
- Polyanin, A., & Zaitsev, V. (2002). Handbook of exact solutions for ordinary differential equations (2nd ed.). Boca Raton, FL: CRC Press.
10.1201/9781420035339 Google Scholar
- Royer, M. (2004). BSDEs with a random terminal time driven by a monotone generator and their links with PDEs. Stochastics, 76(4), 281–307.
- Schroder, M., & Skiadas, C. (1999). Optimal consumption and portfolio selection with stochastic differential utility. Journal of Economic Theory, 89(1), 68–126.
- Seiferling, T., & Seifried, F. T. (2017). Epstein–Zin stochastic differential utility: Existence, uniqueness, concavity, and utility gradients. SSRN Working Paper.
- Shreve, S. E., & Soner, H. M. (1994). Optimal investment and consumption with transaction costs. Annals of Applied Probability, 4(3), 609–692.
- Skiadas, C. (1998). Recursive utility and preferences for information. Economic Theory, 12(2), 293–312.
- Weil, P. (1990). Nonexpected utility in macroeconomics. Quarterly Journal of Economics, 105(1), 29–42.
- Whalley, A. E., & Wilmott, P. (1997). An asymptotic analysis of an optimal hedging model for option pricing with transaction costs. Mathematical Finance, 7(3), 307–324.
- Xing, H. (2017). Consumption investment optimization with Epstein–Zin utility in incomplete markets. Finance and Stochastics, 21(1), 227–262.