Sustainability standards, multicriteria maximin, and viability
Luc Doyen
CNRS, GREThA, Research Group in Theoretical and Applied Economics, University of Bordeaux, Pessac, France
Search for more papers by this authorCorresponding Author
Pedro Gajardo
Departamento de Matemática, Universidad Técnica Federico Santa María, Valparaíso, Chile
Correspondence Pedro Gajardo, Departamento de Matemática, Universidad Técnica Federico Santa María, Avenida España 1680, 2390123 Valparaíso, Chile.
Email: pedro.gajardo@usm.cl
Search for more papers by this authorLuc Doyen
CNRS, GREThA, Research Group in Theoretical and Applied Economics, University of Bordeaux, Pessac, France
Search for more papers by this authorCorresponding Author
Pedro Gajardo
Departamento de Matemática, Universidad Técnica Federico Santa María, Valparaíso, Chile
Correspondence Pedro Gajardo, Departamento de Matemática, Universidad Técnica Federico Santa María, Avenida España 1680, 2390123 Valparaíso, Chile.
Email: pedro.gajardo@usm.cl
Search for more papers by this authorAbstract
This paper deals with sustainability criteria and standards. The maximin criterion, as the highest performance that can be sustained over time, promotes intergenerational equity, a pivotal issue for sustainability. The viable control approach, by investigating trajectories and actions complying over time with various standards and constraints, provides major insights into strong sustainability. The present paper addresses the links between maximin and viability approaches in a multicriteria context. It first shows how “Pareto maximin” can be characterized through viability kernels. Such a result makes it possible to determine the trade-offs and/or synergies between nonsubstitutable economic and ecological standards underlying strong sustainability. The second main result of the paper is to propose algorithms derived from the viability version of dynamic programming to approximate numerically Pareto maximin values, controls, and sustainability standards. Two examples relying on renewable resource management illustrate these analytic and numerical findings. In particular, synergies between sustainability standards of resource conservation, production or profitability are identified for overexploited stocks.
REFERENCES
- Asheim, G. B. (2007). Justifying, characterizing and indicating sustainability, Sustainability, Economics, and Natural Resources. Dordrecht: Springer-Verlag.
10.1007/978-1-4020-6200-1 Google Scholar
- Aubin, J.-P. (1990). A survey of viability theory. SIAM Journal on Control and Optimization, 28(4), 749–788.
- Aubin, J.-P., Bayen, A. M., & Saint-Pierre, P. (2011). Viability theory ( 2nd ed.). Heidelberg: Springer.
10.1007/978-3-642-16684-6 Google Scholar
- Baumgartner, S., & Quaas, M. F. (2009). Ecological-economic viability as a criterion of strong sustainability under uncertainty. Ecological Economics, 68(7), 2008–2020.
- Béné, C., & Doyen, L. (2000). Storage and viability of a fishery with resource and market dephased seasonalities. Environmental and Resource Economics, 15(1), 1–26.
- Béné, C., Doyen, L., & Gabay, D. (2001). A viability analysis for a bio-economic model. Ecological Economics, 36(3), 385–396.
- Bernardo, T. (2008). Viabilité, analyse de sensibilité et mesures d'impact pour des systèmes dynamiques contraints: Application à un modèle de changement climatique (PhD thesis). Paris 9.
- Bonneuil, N., & Boucekkine, R. (2014). Viable ramsey economies. Canadian Journal of Economics/Revue canadienne d’économique, 47(2), 422–441.
- Bruckner, T., Petschel-Held, G., Tóth, F. L., Füssel, H.-M., Helm, C., Leimbach, M., & Schellnhuber, H.-J. (1999). Climate Change decision-support and the tolerable windows approach. Environmental Modeling and Assessment, 4(4), 217–234.
10.1023/A:1019076603956 Google Scholar
- Brundtland, G., Khalid, M., Agnelli, S., Al-Athel, S., Chidzero, B., Fadika, L., & de Botero, M. M. (1987). Our common future (\‘brundtland report\’). Oxford University Press.
- Cairns, R. D., & Long, N. V. (2006). Maximin: A direct approach to sustainability. Environment and Development Economics, 11(3), 275–300.
- Cannarsa, P., & Frankowska, H. (1991). Some characterizations of optimal trajectories in control theory. SIAM Journal on Control and Optimization, 29(6), 1322–1347.
- Chichilnisky, G. (1996). An axiomatic approach to sustainable development. Social Choice and Welfare, 13(2), 231–257.
- Cissé, A. A., Gourguet, S., Doyen, L., Blanchard, F., & Péreau, J.-C. (2013). A bio-economic model for the ecosystem-based management of the coastal fishery in French Guiana. Environment and Development Economics, 18(3), 245–269.
- Clark, C. W. (1990). Mathematical bioeconomics pure and applied mathematics ( 2nd ed.). New York: John Wiley & Sons, Inc.
- De Lara, M., & Doyen, L. (2008). Sustainable management of natural resource: Mathematical models and methods. New York: Springer.
10.1007/978-3-540-79074-7 Google Scholar
- De Lara, M., Doyen, L., Guilbaud, T., & Rochet, M.-J. (2007). Monotonicity properties for the viable control of discrete-time systems. Systems Control Lett. 56(4), 296–302.
- Desilles, A., & Zidani, H. (2018). Pareto front characterization for multi-objective optimal control problems using Hamilton-Jacobi approach. preprint.
- Doyen, L., Armstrong, C., Baumgartner, S., Béné, C., Blanchard, F., Cissé, A. A., & Thébaud, O. (2019). From no whinge scenarios to viability tree. Ecological Economics, 163, 183–188.
- Doyen, L., Béné, C., Bertignac, M., Blanchard, F., Cissé, A. A., Dichmont, C., & Thébaud, O (2017). Ecoviability for ecosystem-based fisheries management. Fish and Fisheries, 18(6), 1056–1072.
- Doyen, L., Cissé, A., Gourguet, S., Mouysset, L., Hardy, P.-Y., Béné, C., & Thébaud, O. (2013). Ecological-economic modelling for the sustainable management of biodiversity. Computational Management Science, 10(4), 353–364.
10.1007/s10287-013-0194-2 Google Scholar
- Doyen, L., & Martinet, V. (2012). Maximin, viability and sustainability. Journal of Economic Dynamics and Control, 36(9), 1414–1430.
- Fleurbaey, M. (2015). On sustainability and social welfare. Journal of Environmental Economics and Management, 71, 34–53.
- Gajardo, P., & Hermosilla, C. (2020). Pareto fronts of the set of sustainable thresholds for constrained control systems. Applied Mathematics & Optimization, 1–19. Advance online publication.
- Gajardo, P., Olivares, M., & Ramírez Cabrera, H. (2018). Methods for the sustainable rebuilding of overexploited natural resources. Environmental Modeling & Assessment, 23(6), 713–727.
- Guigue, A. (2014). Approximation of the Pareto optimal set for multiobjective optimal control problems using viability kernels. ESAIM: Control, Optimisation and Calculus of Variations, 20(1), 95–115.
- Howarth, R. (1995). Sustainability under uncertainty: A deontological approach. Land Economics, 71(4), 417–427.
- Krawczyk, J. B., Pharo, A., Serea, O. S., & Sinclair, S. (2013). Computation of viability kernels: A case study of by-catch fisheries. Computational Management Science, 10(4), 365–396.
10.1007/s10287-013-0189-z Google Scholar
- Margolis, M., & Naevdal, E. (2008). Climate change decision-support and the tolerable windows approach. Environmental Resource Economics, 4(40), 401.
- Martinet, V. (2011). A characterization of sustainability with indicators. Journal of Environmental Economics and Management, 61, 183–197.
- Martinet, V., & Doyen, L. (2007). Sustainability of an economy with an exhaustible resource: A viable control approach. Resource and Energy Economics, 29(1), 17–39.
- Martinet, V., Gajardo, P., De Lara, M., & Ramırez Cabrera, H. (2011). Bargaining with intertemporal maximin payoffs (EconomiX Working Papers 2011-7). EconomiX, University of Paris West—Nanterre la Défense, Nanterre.
- Miettinen, K. (1999). Nonlinear multiobjective optimization, volume 12 of International Series in Operations Research & Management Science. Boston, MA: Kluwer Academic Publishers.
- Neumayer, E. (2010). Weak versus strong sustainability: Exploring the limits of two opposing paradigms ( 3rd ed.). Northampton, MA: Edward Elgar Publishing.
10.4337/9781849805438 Google Scholar
- Oubraham, A., & Zaccour, G. (2018). A survey of applications of viability theory to the sustainable exploitation of renewable resources. Ecological Economics, 145(Suppl. C), 346–367.
- Péreau, J.-C., Doyen, L., Little, L. R., & Thébaud, O. (2012). The triple bottom line: Meeting ecological, economic and social goals with individual transferable quotas. Journal of Environmental Economics and Management, 63(3), 419–434.
- Pereau, J.-C., Mouysset, L., & Doyen, L. (2018). Groundwater management in a food security context. Environmental and Resource Economics, 71(2), 319–336.
- Rockström, J., Steffen, W., Noone, K., Persson, A, Chapin, F. S., III, Lambin, E. F., & Foley, J. A. (2009). A safe operating space for humanity. Nature, 461(09), 472–475.
- Schuhbauer, A., & Sumaila, U. (2016). Economic viability and small-scale fisheries - a review. Ecological Economics, 124(C), 69–75.
- Solow, R. (1974). Intergenerational equity and exhaustible resources. Review of Economic Studies, 41(5), 29–45.
10.2307/2296370 Google Scholar