Original Article
Universal Gravitation and the (Un)Intelligibility of Natural Philosophy
Matias Slavov Postdoctoral researcher,
Matias Slavov Postdoctoral researcher
Department of Social Sciences and Philosophy, University of Jyväskylä
Search for more papers by this authorMatias Slavov Postdoctoral researcher,
Matias Slavov Postdoctoral researcher
Department of Social Sciences and Philosophy, University of Jyväskylä
Search for more papers by this authorAbstract
This article centers on Hume's position on the intelligibility of natural philosophy. To that end, the controversy surrounding universal gravitation shall be scrutinized. It is very well known that Hume sides with the Newtonian experimentalist approach rather than with the Leibnizian demand for intelligibility. However, what is not clear is Hume's overall position on the intelligibility of natural philosophy. It shall be argued that Hume declines Leibniz's principle of intelligibility. However, Hume does not eschew intelligibility altogether; his concept of causation itself stipulates mechanical intelligibility.
References
- Anstey, P. (2015). ‘Experimental Pedagogy and the Eclipse of Robert Boyle in England,' Intellectual History Review 25(1), pp. 115–131.
10.1080/17496977.2014.891182 Google Scholar
- Barfoot, M. (1990). ‘ Hume and the Culture of Science in the Early Eighteenth Century,' in M. A. Stewart (ed.) Studies in the Philosophy of Scottish Enlightenment. Oxford: Oxford University Press, pp. 151–190.
- Belkind, O. (2012). ‘ Newton's Scientific Method and the Universal Law of Gravitation,' in A. Janiak and E. Schliesser (eds) Interpreting Newton. Critical Essays. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, pp. 138–168.
- Berkeley, G. 1709(1948). ‘ An Essay Towards a New Theory of Vision,' in A. A. Luce and T. E. Jessop (eds) The Works of George Berkeley, the Bishop of Cloyne, Volume, Volume 1. London: Thomas Nelson and Sons, pp. 171–236.
- Biener, Z. (2017). ‘De Gravitatione Reconsidered: The Changing Significance of Experimental Evidence for Newton's Metaphysics of Space,' Journal of the History of Philosophy 55(4), pp. 583–608.
- Brown, C. R. and Morris, W. E. (2012). Starting with Hume. London and New York: Continuum.
- Boehm, M. (2013). ‘The Normativity of Experience and Causal Belief in Hume's Treatise,' Hume Studies 39(2), pp. 203–231.
- Boehm, M. (2016). ‘Hume's Foundational Project in the Treatise,' European Journal of Philosophy 24(1), pp. 55–77.
- Buckle, S. (2004). Hume's Enlightenment Tract. Oxford: Clarendon Press.
10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199271146.001.0001 Google Scholar
- Burnham, D. (2018) ‘ Gottfried Leibniz: Metaphysics.' Internet Encyclopedia of Philosophy, ISSN 2161-0002, http://www.iep.utm.edu/leib-met/.
- Capaldi, N. (1975). David Hume: The Newtonian Philosopher. Boston: Twayne Publishers.
- Chambers, E. (1728). Cyclopædia, or an Universal Dictionary of Arts and Sciences, 2 volumes, with the 1753 supplement. Digitized by the University of Wisconsin Digital Collections Center. Available at http://uwdc.library.wisc.edu/collections/HistSciTech/Cyclopaedia
- Dear, P. (2006). ‘ The Intelligibility of Nature,' in How Science Makes Sense of the World. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
10.7208/chicago/9780226139500.001.0001 Google Scholar
- Della Rocca, M. (2017). ‘ Playing with Fire: Hume, Rationalism, and a Little Bit of Spinoza,' in M. Della Rocca (ed.) The Oxford Handbook of Spinoza. New York: Oxford University Press, pp. 464–481.
- Demeter, T. (2014). ‘ Enlarging the Bounds of Moral Philosophy: Newton's Method and Hume's Science of Man,' in Z. Biener and E. Schliesser (eds) Newton and Empiricism. New York: Oxford University Press, pp. 171–206.
10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199337095.003.0008 Google Scholar
- Demeter, T. (2017). David Hume and the Culture of Scottish Newtonianism: Methodology and Ideology in Enlightenment Inquiry. Boston: Brill.
- De Regt, H. W. (2017). Understanding Scientific Understanding. New York: Oxford University Press.
10.1093/oso/9780190652913.001.0001 Google Scholar
- De Pierris, G. (2006). ‘Hume and Locke on Scientific Methodology: The Newtonian Legacy,' Hume Studies 32(2), pp. 277–330.
- Descartes, R. 1644(1982). Principles of Philosophy. Valentine Rodger Miller, Reese P. Miller (eds. trans.). Dordrecht, Boston, London: Kluwer Academic Publishers.
- Dicken, P. (2011). ‘On Some Limitations of Humean Disagreement: Miraculous Testimony and Contrary Religions,' Sophia 50(3), pp. 345–355.
- Downing, L. (2005). ‘ Occasionalism and Strict Mechanism: Malebranche, Berkeley, Fontenelle,' in C. Mercer and E. O'Neill (eds) Early Modern Philosophy: Mind, Matter, and Metaphysics. New York: Oxford University Press, pp. 206–230.
10.1093/0195177606.003.0013 Google Scholar
- Ducheyne, S. (2009). ‘ “Newtonian” Elements in Locke, Hume, and Reid, or: How Far Can One Stretch a Label?' in S. D. Snobelen (ed.) Enlightenment and Dissent. Isaac Newton in the Eighteenth Century, no, Volume 25, pp. 62–105.
- Ducheyne, S. (2012). The Main Business of Natural Philosophy. Isaac Newton's Natural-Philosophical Methodology. Dordrecht, Heidelberg, London, New York: Springer.
- Dunlop, K. (2012). ‘ What Geometry Postulates: Newton and Barrow on the Relationship of Mathematics to Nature,' in A. Janiak and E. Schliesser (eds) Interpreting Newton: Critical Essays. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, pp. 69–102.
- Force, J. E. (1987). ‘Hume's Interest in Newton and Science,' Hume Studies 13(2), pp. 166–216.
- Garber, D. and Roux, S. (2013). ‘ Introduction,' in R. Garber (ed.) The Mechanization of Natural Philosophy, xi-xviii. Dordrecht: Springer.
- Harper, W. (2011). ‘ Isaac Newton's Scientific Method,' in Turning Data into Evidence about Gravity and Cosmology. New York: Oxford University Press.
- Harper, W. (2016). ‘ Newton's Argument for Universal Gravitation,' in R. Iliffe and G. E. Smith (eds) Cambridge Companion to Newton, Second edn. Clays, St Ives plc: Cambridge University Press, pp. 229–260.
10.1017/CCO9781139058568.007 Google Scholar
- Hazony, Y. and Schliesser, E. (2016). ‘ Newton and Hume,' in P. Russell (ed.) The Oxford Handbook of Hume. New York: Oxford University Press, pp. 673–707.
- Henry, J. (2011). ‘Gravity and De gravitatione: The Development of Newton's Ideas on Action at a Distance,' Studies in History and Philosophy of Science 42, pp. 11–27.
- Hight, M. A. (2008). Idea and Ontology. An Essay in Early Modern Metaphysics of Ideas. University Park, Pennsylvania: The Pennsylvania State University Press.
- Hume, D. (2000). in D. F. Norton and M. J. Norton (eds) A Treatise of Human Nature. New York: Oxford University Press.
- Hume, D. (2006a). in T. L. Beauchamp (ed.) An Enquiry Concerning Human Understanding. New York: Oxford University Press.
- Hume, D. (2006b). in T. L. Beauchamp (ed.) An Enquiry Concerning the Principles of Morals. New York: Oxford University Press.
- Janiak, A. (2007). ‘Newton and the Reality of Force,' Journal of the History of Philosophy 45(1), pp. 127–147.
- Janiak, A. (2008). Newton as Philosopher. New York: Cambridge University Press.
- Janiak, A. (2013). ‘Metaphysics and Natural Philosophy in Descartes and Newton,' Foundations of Science 18, pp. 403–417.
- Jones, P. (1984). Hume's Sentiments: Their Ciceronian and French Context. Edinburgh: Edinburgh University Press.
- Kochiras, H. (2011). ‘Gravity's Cause and Substance Counting: Contextualizing the Problems,' Studies in History and Philosophy of Science 42, pp. 167–184.
- Kochiras, H. (2013). ‘The Mechanical Philosophy and Newton's Mechanical Force,' Philosophy in Science 80(4), pp. 557–578.
- Kochiras, H. (2017a). ‘ Locke's Philosophy of Science,' in E. N. Zalta (ed.) The Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy. URL = https://plato.stanford.edu/entries/locke-philosophy-science/.
- Kochiras, H. (2017b) ‘ Newton's General Scholium and the Mechanical Philosophy.' <hal-01442121v2>.
- Landy, D. (2018). Hume's Science of Human Nature. Scientific Realism, Reason, and Substantial Explanation. New York and London: Routledge.
- Laudan, L. (1981). ‘ Thomas Reid and the Newtonian Turn of British Methodological Thought,' in Science and Hypotheses. Dordrecht: Springer, pp. 86–110.
10.1007/978-94-015-7288-0_7 Google Scholar
- Leibniz, G. W. 1697(1989a). ‘ On the Ultimate Origination of Things.' In Ariew, Roger and Garber, Daniel (eds. trans.),' in Philosophical Essays. Hackett Publishing Company: Indianapolis & Cambridge, pp. 149–155.
- Leibniz, G. W. ca. 1710–1716(1989b). ‘ Against Barbaric Physics: Toward a Philosophy of What There Actually Is and Against the Revival of the Qualities of the Scholastics and Cimerical Intelligences.' In Ariew, Roger and Garber, Daniel (eds. trans.),' in Philosophical Essays. Indianapolis & Cambridge: Hackett Publishing Company, pp. 312–320.
- Leibniz, G. W. 1715–1716(1989c). ‘ From the Letters to Clarke (1715–16).' In Ariew, Roger and Garber, Daniel (eds. trans.),' in Philosophical Essays. Indianapolis & Cambridge: Hackett Publishing Company, pp. 321–346.
- Leibniz, G. W. 1704(1996). New Essays Concerning Human Understanding. Peter Remnant and Jonathan Bennett (trans. eds.). Glasgow: Cambridge University Press.
10.1017/CBO9781139166874 Google Scholar
- Malebranche, N. 1674–1675(1977). Search after Truth. Thomas M. Lennon and Paul J. Olscamp (trans. eds.). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
- McDonough, J. K. (2014). ‘ Leibniz's Philosophy of Physics,' in E. N. Zalta (ed.) The Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy. URL=https://plato.stanford.edu/entries/leibniz-physics/.
- McMullin, E. (1978). Newton on Matter and Activity. Notre Dame, London: Notre Dame University Press.
- Meli, D. B. (1993). Equivalence and Priority: Newton Versus Leibniz. Oxford: Clarendon Press.
- Millican, P. (2003). ‘ Hume's Sceptical Doubts Concerning Induction,' in P. Millican (ed.) Reading Hume on Human Understanding. Essays on the First Enquiry. New York: Oxford University Press, pp. 107–174.
- Millican, P. (2007). in D. Hume (ed.) Ix-lvi Introduction to an Enquiry Concerning Human Understanding by. New York: Oxford University Press.
- Millican, P. (2017). ‘Hume's Fork, and His Theory of Relations,' Philosophy and Phenomenological Research 95(1), pp. 3–65.
- Newton, I. 1672(1974). ‘ From a Letter to Oldenburg,' in I. Newton and H. S. Thayer (eds) Newton's Philosophy of Nature: Selections from His Writings. New York: Hafner Press, pp. 6–7.
- Newton, I. 1692–1693(2004a). ‘ Correspondence with Richard Bentley,' in A. Janiak (ed.) Newton. Philosophical Writings. New York: Cambridge University Press, pp. 94–105.
10.1017/CBO9780511809293 Google Scholar
- Newton, I. 1704(1979). Opticks. Mineola: Dover Publications.
- Newton, I. 1713(2004b). ‘ Correspondence with Roger Cotes,' in A. Janiak (ed.) Newton. Philosophical Writings. New York: Cambridge University Press, pp. 118–122.
10.1017/CBO9780511809293 Google Scholar
- Newton, I. 1687, 1714, 1723(1999). The Principia. Mathematical Principles of Natural Philosophy. Cohen, I. Bernard, Whitman, Anne (trans., eds.), Budenz, Julia (ass.). Berkeley: University of California Press.
- Ott, W. (2009). Causation and Laws of Nature in Early Modern Philosophy. New York: Oxford University Press.
10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199570430.001.0001 Google Scholar
- Owen, D. (2003). ‘ Hume Versus Price on Miracles and Prior Probabilities: Testimony and the Bayesian Calculation,' in P. Millican (ed.) Reading Hume on Human Understanding. New York: Oxford University Press, pp. 335–348.
- Robison, W. (2018). ‘ Hume, Descartes, and Adam: Hume's Project,' in Proceedings of the 45th Annual Hume Society Conference. Budapest: Hungarian Academy of Sciences.
- Rosenberg, A. (1993). ‘ Hume and the Philosophy of Science,' in D. F. Norton (ed.) The Cambridge Companion to Hume. New York: Cambridge University Press, pp. 64–89.
10.1017/CCOL0521382734.003 Google Scholar
- Rutherford, D. (1992). ‘Leibniz's Principle of Intelligibility,' History of Philosophy Quarterly 9(1), pp. 35–49.
- Ryan, T. (2003). ‘Hume's Argument for the Temporal Priority of Causes,' Hume Studies 29(1), pp. 29–41.
10.1353/hms.2011.0121 Google Scholar
- Schliesser, E. (2007). ‘ Hume's Newtonianism and Anti-Newtonianism,' in E. N. Zalta (ed.) The Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy. URL = https://plato.stanford.edu/entries/hume-newton/.
- Schliesser, E. (2009). ‘ Hume's Attack on Newton's Philosophy,' in S. D. Snobelen (ed.) Enlightenment and Dissent. Isaac Newton in the Eighteenth Century, no, Volume 25, pp. 167–203.
- Schliesser, E. (2011). ‘ Without God: Gravity as a Relational Quality of Matter in Newton's Treatise,' in P. Anstey and D. Jalobeanu (eds) Vanishing Matter and the Laws of Motion: Descartes and Beyond. New York: Routledge, pp. 80–102.
- Schliesser, E. (2013). ‘On Reading Newton as an Epicurean: Kant, Spinozism and the Changes to the Principia,' Studies in History and Philosophy of Science 44, pp. 416–428.
- Shapiro, A. E. (2004). ‘Newton's “Experimental Philosophy.”,' Early Science and Medicine 9(3), pp. 185–217.
10.1163/1573382042176254 Google Scholar
- Slavov, M. (2013). ‘Newton's Law of Universal Gravitation and Hume's Conception of Causality,' Philosophia Naturalis 50(2), pp. 277–305.
10.3196/003180215815620396 Google Scholar
- Slavov, M. (2016a). ‘Newtonian and Non-Newtonian Elements in Hume,' Journal of Scottish Philosophy 14(3), pp. 275–296.
- Slavov, M. (2016b). ‘Hume on the Laws of Dynamics: The Tacit Assumption of Mechanism,' Hume Studies 42(1–2), pp. 113–136.
- Smeenk, C. (forthcoming) ‘ Cosmology and Physical Astronomy in Newton's General Scholium.' Submitted for a volume regarding Newton's General Scholium. In Snobelen, S. D., Ducheyne, S., Mandelbrote, S. (eds.).
- Smit, H. (2010). ‘Apriority, Reason, and Induction in Hume,' Journal of the History of Philosophy 48(3), pp. 313–343.
- Smith, G. E. (2016). ‘ The Methodology of the Principia,' in R. Iliffe and G. E. Smith (eds) Cambridge Companion to Newton, Second edn. Clays, St Ives plc: Cambridge University Press, pp. 187–228.
10.1017/CCO9781139058568.006 Google Scholar
- Smith, G. E. and Iliffe, R. (2016). ‘ Introduction,' in R. Iliffe and G. E. Smith (eds) Cambridge Companion to Newton, Second edn. Clays, St Ives plc: Cambridge University Press, pp. 1–33.
- Snelders, H. A. M. (1989). ‘Christiaan Huygens and Newton's Theory of Gravitation,' The Royal Society Journal of the History of Science 43(2), pp. 209–222.
- Stanistreet, P. (2002). Hume's Scepticism and the Science of Human Nature. Aldershot: Ashgate.
- Stein, H. (1970). ‘ On the Notion of Field in Newton, Maxwell, and Beyond,' in R. H. Stuewer (ed.) Historical Perspectives of Science. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press, pp. 264–287.
- Stein, H. (1990). ‘“From the Phenomena of Motions to the Forces of Nature”: Hypothesis or Deduction?' Proceedings of the Biennial Meeting of the Philosophy of Science Association 2, pp. 209–222.
10.1086/psaprocbienmeetp.1990.2.193069 Google Scholar
- Taylor, J. (2015). Reflecting Subjects: Passion, Sympathy, and Society in Hume's Philosophy. New York: Oxford University Press.
10.1093/acprof:oso/9780198729525.001.0001 Google Scholar
- Westfall, R. (1993). The Life of Isaac Newton. New York: Cambridge University Press.
