The Sources of Belief in Personal Capability: Antecedents of Self-Efficacy in Private Adaptation to Flood Risk
Corresponding Author
Sebastian Seebauer
LIFE – Centre for Climate, Energy and Society, JOANNEUM RESEARCH Forschungsgesellschaft mbH, Waagner-Biro-Straße 100, Graz, Styria, 8020 Austria
Address correspondence to Sebastian Seebauer, JOANNEUM RESEARCH Forschungsgesellschaft mbH, LIFE – Centre for Climate, Energy and Society, Waagner-Biro-Straße 100, 8020 Graz, Austria; tel: ++43(0)3168767654; fax: ++43(0)3168767699; sebastian.seebauer@joanneum.at.
Search for more papers by this authorPhilipp Babcicky
LIFE – Centre for Climate, Energy and Society, JOANNEUM RESEARCH Forschungsgesellschaft mbH, Waagner-Biro-Straße 100, Graz, Styria, 8020 Austria
Search for more papers by this authorCorresponding Author
Sebastian Seebauer
LIFE – Centre for Climate, Energy and Society, JOANNEUM RESEARCH Forschungsgesellschaft mbH, Waagner-Biro-Straße 100, Graz, Styria, 8020 Austria
Address correspondence to Sebastian Seebauer, JOANNEUM RESEARCH Forschungsgesellschaft mbH, LIFE – Centre for Climate, Energy and Society, Waagner-Biro-Straße 100, 8020 Graz, Austria; tel: ++43(0)3168767654; fax: ++43(0)3168767699; sebastian.seebauer@joanneum.at.
Search for more papers by this authorPhilipp Babcicky
LIFE – Centre for Climate, Energy and Society, JOANNEUM RESEARCH Forschungsgesellschaft mbH, Waagner-Biro-Straße 100, Graz, Styria, 8020 Austria
Search for more papers by this authorAbstract
Self-efficacy is one of the strongest and most consistent drivers of private flood mitigation behavior; however, the factors influencing self-efficacy in the context of flooding remain unclear. The present study examines three potential antecedents of self-efficacy: personal and vicarious experiences of floods or building-related events, social norms for private flood preparedness, and personal competencies such as technical abilities and social skills. While controlling for other drivers in a protection motivation theory (PMT) framework, these antecedents are tested as precursors of self-efficacy and intentions to improve flood resilience. Structural equation modeling is applied to conduct mediation analyses with survey data of 381 flood-prone households in Austria. Contrary to theoretical expectations, personal and vicarious experiences do not predict self-efficacy, presumably because rare flood events and changing hazard characteristics do not facilitate generalizable performance accomplishments. Social norms strongly and consistently influence self-efficacy, especially for actions observable by others, and also directly influence protective responses. Personal competencies increase self-efficacy and support protective action, particularly with regard to preventive and structural measures. The strength and direction of the antecedents of self-efficacy as well as of other PMT determinants vary between general and specific protective responses. This study provides important insights for risk managers, suggesting that interventions involving social norms and personal competencies can be effective in stimulating self-efficacy and, in turn, private flood mitigation. Interventions and research should clearly differentiate between general intention and the implementation of specific measures, and should address cumulative, synergistic, or tradeoff interrelations between multiple measures.
Supporting Information
| Filename | Description |
|---|---|
| risa13531-sup-0001-TableS1.xlsx44.4 KB | Supporting Material |
Please note: The publisher is not responsible for the content or functionality of any supporting information supplied by the authors. Any queries (other than missing content) should be directed to the corresponding author for the article.
REFERENCES
- Babcicky, P., & Seebauer, S. (2019). Unpacking protection motivation theory: Evidence for a separate protective and non-protective route in private flood mitigation behavior. Journal of Risk Research, 22(12), 1503–1521. https://doi.org/10.1080/13669877.2018.1485175
- Babcicky, P., & Seebauer, S. (2017). The two faces of social capital in private flood mitigation: Opposing effects on risk perception, self-efficacy and coping capacity. Journal of Risk Research, 20(8), 1017–1037.
- Backhaus, K., Erichson, B., & Weiber, R. (2015). Fortgeschrittene multivariate Analysemethoden. Berlin: Springer.
10.1007/978-3-662-46087-0 Google Scholar
- Bamberg, S. (2013). Changing environmentally harmful behaviors: A stage model of self-regulated behavioral change. Journal of Environmental Psychology, 34, 151–159.
- Bamberg, S., Masson, T., Brewitt, K., & Nemetschek, N. (2017). Threat, coping and flood prevention – A meta-analysis. Journal of Environmental Psychology, 54, 116–126.
- Bandura, A. (1977). Self-efficacy: Toward a unifying theory of behavioral change. Psychological Review, 84(2), 191–215.
- Bandura, A. (1982). Self-efficacy mechanism in human agency. American Psychologist, 37(2), 122–147.
- Becker, J. S., Paton, D., Johnston, D. M., & Ronan, K. R. (2012). A model of household preparedness for earthquakes: How individuals make meaning of earthquake information and how this influences preparedness. Natural Hazards, 64(1), 107–137.
- Botzen, W., Aerts, J., & van den Bergh, J. C. (2009). Willingness of homeowners to mitigate climate risk through insurance. Ecological Economics, 68(8), 2265–2277.
- Botzen, W. J. Wouter, Kunreuther, H., Czajkowski, J., & Moel, H. (2019). Adoption of individual flood damage mitigation measures in new york city: An extension of protection motivation theory. Risk Analysis, 39(10), 2143–2159. https://doi.org/10.1111/risa.13318.
- Bubeck, P., Botzen, W. J. W., & Aerts, J. C. J. H. (2012). A review of risk perceptions and other factors that influence flood mitigation behavior. Risk Analysis, 32(9), 1481–1495.
- Bubeck, P., Botzen, W. J. W., Kreibich, H., & Aerts, J. C. J. H. (2013). Detailed insights into the influence of flood-coping appraisals on mitigation behaviour. Global Environmental Change, 23(5), 1327–1338.
- Bubeck, P., Botzen, W. W., Laudan, J., Aerts, J. C., & Thieken, A. H. (2018). Insights into flood-coping appraisals of protection motivation theory: Empirical evidence from Germany and France. Risk Analysis, 38, 1239–1257.
- Byrne, B. M. (2010). Structural equation modeling with AMOS: Basic concepts, applications, and programming. New York: Routledge.
- Cialdini, R. B., Reno, R. R., & Kallgren, C. A. (1990). A focus theory of normative conduct: Recycling the concept of norms to reduce littering in public places. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 58(6), 1015–1026.
- Covey, J., Horwell, C. J., Rachmawati, L., Ogawa, R., Martin-del Pozzo, A. L., Armienta, M. A., … Dominelli, L. (2019). Factors motivating the use of respiratory protection against volcanic ashfall: A comparative analysis of communities in Japan, Indonesia and Mexico. International Journal of Disaster Risk Reduction, 35, 101066. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijdrr.2019.101066
- Demuth, J. L., Morss, R. E., Lazo, J. K., & Trumbo, C. (2016). The effects of past hurricane experiences on evacuation intentions through risk perception and efficacy beliefs: A mediation analysis. Weather, Climate, and Society, 8(4), 327–344.
- Edwards-Schachter, M., García-Granero, A., Sánchez-Barrioluengo, M., Quesada-Pineda, H., & Amara, N. (2015). Disentangling competences: Interrelationships on creativity, innovation and entrepreneurship. Thinking Skills and Creativity, 16, 27–39.
- Enders, C. K., & Bandalos, D. L. (2001). The relative performance of full information maximum likelihood estimation for missing data in structural equation models. Structural Equation Modeling: A Multidisciplinary Journal, 8(3), 430–457.
- Frick, J., Kaiser, F., & Wilson, M. (2004). Environmental knowledge and conservation behavior: Exploring prevalence and structure in a representative sample. Personality and Individual Differences, 37, 1597–1613
- Grothmann, T., & Reusswig, F. (2006). People at risk of flooding: Why some residents take precautionary action while others do not. Natural Hazards, 38(1), 101–120.
- HORA (Natural Hazard Overview & Risk Assessment Austria) (2018). Hochwasserrisikozonierung. [Digital Hazard Map]. Retrieved from http://hora.gv.at
- Kasperson, R. E., Renn, O., Slovic, P., Brown, H. S., Emel, J., Goble, R., … Ratick, S. (1988). The social amplification of risk: A conceptual framework. Risk Analysis, 8(2), 177–187.
- Kellens, W., Terpstra, T., & De Maeyer, P. (2013). Perception and communication of flood risks: A systematic review of empirical research. Risk Analysis, 33(1), 24–49.
- Kreibich, H., Bubeck, P., van Vliet, M., & de Moel, H. (2015). A review of damage-reducing measures to manage fluvial flood risks in a changing climate. Mitigation and Adaptation Strategies for Global Change, 20, 967–989.
- Kunreuther, H. C., & Michel-Kerjan, E. O. (2009). At war with the weather: Managing large-scale risks in a new era of catastrophes. Cambridge: MIT Press.
10.7551/mitpress/9780262012829.001.0001 Google Scholar
- Lawrence, J., Quade, D., & Becker, J. (2014). Integrating the effects of flood experience on risk perception with responses to changing climate risk. Natural Hazards, 74(3), 1773–1794.
- Le Deist, F. D., & Winterton, J. (2005). What is competence? Human Resource Development International, 8(1), 27–46.
10.1080/1367886042000338227 Google Scholar
- Lindell, M. K., & Hwang, S. N. (2008). Households' perceived personal risk and responses in a multihazard environment. Risk Analysis, 28(2), 539–556.
- Lindell, M. K., & Perry, R. W. (2000). Household adjustment to earthquake hazard a review of research. Environment and Behavior, 32(4), 461–501.
- Liu, T., & Jiao, H. (2018). How does information affect fire risk reduction behaviors? Mediating effects of cognitive processes and subjective knowledge. Natural Hazards, 90(3), 1461–1483.
- Lo, A. Y. (2013). The role of social norms in climate adaptation: Mediating risk perception and flood insurance purchase. Global Environmental Change, 23(5), 1249–1257.
- Marsh, H. W., & Hocevar, D. (1985). Application of confirmatory factor analysis to the study of self-concept: First- and higher order factor models and their invariance across groups. Psychological Bulletin, 97(3), 562–582.
- Martin, I. M., Bender, H. W., & Raish, C. (2008). Making the decision to mitigate risk. In W. E. Martin, C. Raish, & B. Kent (Eds.), Wildfire risk: Human perceptions and management implications (pp. 117–141). Washington, DC: Resources for the Future.
- McEwen, L., Holmes, A., Quinn, N., & Cobbing, P. (2018). ‘Learning for resilience': Developing community capital through flood action groups in urban flood risk settings with lower social capital. International Journal of Disaster Risk Reduction, 27, 329–342.
- McIvor, D., & Paton, D. (2007). Preparing for natural hazards: Normative and attitudinal influences. Disaster Prevention and Management: An International Journal, 16(1), 79–88.
10.1108/09653560710729839 Google Scholar
- Mertens, K., Jacobs, L., Maes, J., Poesen, J., Kervyn, M., & Vranken, L. (2018). Disaster risk reduction among households exposed to landslide hazard: A crucial role for self-efficacy? Land Use Policy, 75, 77–91.
- Miceli, R., Sotgiu, I., & Settanni, M. (2008). Disaster preparedness and perception of flood risk: A study in an alpine valley in Italy. Journal of Environmental Psychology, 28(2), 164–173.
- Mishra, S., & Suar, D. (2012). Effects of anxiety, disaster education, and resources on disaster preparedness behavior. Journal of Applied Social Psychology, 42(5), 1069–1087.
- Mulilis, J. P., & Lippa, R. (1990). Behavioral change in earthquake preparedness due to negative threat appeals: A test of protection motivation theory. Journal of Applied Social Psychology, 20(8), 619–638.
- Norris, F. H., Smith, T., & Kaniasty, K. (1999). Revisiting the experience–behavior hypothesis: The effects of Hurricane Hugo on hazard preparedness and other self-protective acts. Basic and Applied Social Psychology, 21(1), 37–47.
- Ogunbode, C. A., Böhm, G., Capstick, S. B., Demski, C., Spence, A., & Tausch, N. (2018). The resilience paradox: Flooding experience, coping and climate change mitigation intentions. Climate Policy, 19, 703–715.
- Perkins, D., & Zimmerman, M. (1995). Empowerment theory, research, and application. American Journal of Community Psychology, 23(5), 569–579.
- Poussin, J. K., Botzen, W. J. W., & Aerts, J. C. J. H. (2014). Factors of influence on flood damage mitigation behaviour by households. Environmental Science & Policy, 40, 69–77.
- Prochaska, J. O., & Velicer, W. F. (1997). The transtheoretical model of health behavior change. American Journal of Health Promotion, 12(1), 38–48.
- Raschky, P. A., Schwarze, R., Schwindt, M., & Zahn, F. (2013). Uncertainty of governmental relief and the crowding out of flood insurance. Environmental and Resource Economics, 54(2), 179–200.
- Richert, C., Erdlenbruch, K., & Figuières, C. (2017). The determinants of households’ flood mitigation decisions in France: On the possibility of feedback effects from past investments. Ecological Economics, 131, 342–352.
- Rimal, R. N. (2000). Closing the knowledge-behavior gap in health promotion: The mediating role of self-efficacy. Health Communication, 12(3), 219–237.
- Rogers, R. W. (1983). Cognitive and physiological processes in fear appeals and attitude change: A revised theory of protection motivation. In J. T. Cacioppo & R. Petty (Eds.), Social psychophysiology: A sourcebook (pp. 153–176). London: Guilford.
- Schunk, D. H. (1995). Self-efficacy and education and instruction. In J. E. Maddux (Ed.), Self-efficacy, adaptation, and adjustment: Theory, research, and application (pp. 281–303). New York: Plenum Press.
10.1007/978-1-4419-6868-5_10 Google Scholar
- Siegrist, M., & Gutscher, H. (2008). Natural hazards and motivation for mitigation behavior: People cannot predict the affect evoked by a severe flood. Risk Analysis, 28(3), 771–778.
- Stewart, A. (2015). The measurement of personal self-efficacy in preparing for a hurricane and its role in modeling the likelihood of evacuation. Journal of Marine Science and Engineering, 3(3), 630–653.
- Terpstra, T. (2011). Emotions, trust, and perceived risk: Affective and cognitive routes to flood preparedness behavior. Risk Analysis, 31(10), 1658–1675.
- Thieken, A. H., Kreibich, H., Müller, M., & Merz, B. (2007). Coping with floods: Preparedness, response and recovery of flood-affected residents in Germany in 2002. Hydrological Sciences Journal, 52(5), 1016–1037.
- Thistlethwaite, J., Henstra, D., Brown, C., & Scott, D. (2018). How flood experience and risk perception influences protective actions and behaviours among Canadian homeowners. Environmental Management, 61, 197–208.
- van Valkengoed, A. M., & Steg, L. (2019). Meta-analyses of factors motivating climate change adaptation behaviour. Nature Climate Change, 9(2), 158–163.
- Vallance, S., & Carlton, S. (2015). First to respond, last to leave: Communities' roles and resilience across the ‘4Rs’. International Journal of Disaster Risk Reduction, 14, 27–36.
- Weinstein, N. D. (1989). Effects of personal experience on self-protective behavior. Psychological Bulletin, 105(1), 31–50.
- Winterton, J., Delamare-Le Deist, F., & Stringfellow, E. (2006). Typology of knowledge, skills and competences: Clarification of the concept and prototype. Luxembourg: Office for Official Publications of the European Communities. Retrieved from https://www.cedefop.europa.eu/files/3048_en.pdf
- Wood, M. M., Mileti, D. S., Kano, M., Kelley, M. M., Regan, R., & Bourque, L. B. (2012). Communicating actionable risk for terrorism and other hazards. Risk Analysis, 32(4), 601–615.
- Zaalberg, R., Midden, C., Meijnders, A., & McCalley, T. (2009). Prevention, adaptation, and threat denial: Flooding experiences in the Netherlands. Risk Analysis, 29(12), 1759–1778.
