A Resilience-Based Approach to Risk Assessments—Building Resilient Organizations under Arctic Conditions
Corresponding Author
Jacob Taarup-Esbensen
University College Copenhagen, Copenhagen, Denmark
Address correspondence to Jacob Taarup-Esbensen, University College Copenhagen, Sigurdsgade 26, 2200 København N, Denmark; jata@kp.dk.
Search for more papers by this authorCorresponding Author
Jacob Taarup-Esbensen
University College Copenhagen, Copenhagen, Denmark
Address correspondence to Jacob Taarup-Esbensen, University College Copenhagen, Sigurdsgade 26, 2200 København N, Denmark; jata@kp.dk.
Search for more papers by this authorAbstract
Reliability and higher levels of safety are thought to be achieved by using systematic approaches to managing risks. The assessment of risks has produced a range of different approaches to assessing these uncertainties, presenting models for how risks affect individuals or organizations. Contemporary risk assessment tools based on this approach have proven difficult for practitioners to use as tools for tactical and operational decision making. This article presents an alternative to these assessments by utilizing a resilience perspective, arguing that complex systems are inclined to variety and uncertainty regarding the results they produce and are therefore prone to systemic failures. A continuous improvement approach is a source of reliability when managing complex systems and is necessary to manage varieties and uncertainties. For an organization to understand how risk events occur, it is necessary to define what is believed to be the equilibrium of the system in time and space. By applying a resilience engineering (RE) perspective to risk assessment, it is possible to manage this complexity by assessing the ability to respond, monitor, learn, and anticipate risks, and in so doing to move away from the flawed frequency and consequences approach. Using a research station network in the Arctic as an example illustrates how an RE approach qualifies assessments by bridging risk assessments with value-creation processes. The article concludes by arguing that a resilience-based risk assessment can improve on current practice, including for organizations located outside the Arctic region.
REFERENCES
- Aven, T. (2012). Foundational issues in risk assessment and risk management. Risk Analysis, 32(10), 1647–1656. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1539-6924.2012.01798.x
- Aven, T. (2016). Risk assessment and risk management: Review of recent advances on their foundation. European Journal of Operational Research, 253(1), 1–13. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ejor.2015.12.023
- Aven, T., & Krohn, B. S. (2014). A new perspective on how to understand, assess and manage risk and the unforeseen. Reliability Engineering and System Safety, 121, 1–10. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ress.2013.07.005
- Aven, T., & Renn, O. (2009). On risk defined as an event where the outcome is uncertain. Journal of Risk Research, 12(1), 1–11. https://doi.org/10.1080/13669870802488883
- Dekker, S. (2019). Foundations of safety science. London: CRC Press LLC.
10.4324/9781351059794 Google Scholar
- Delvosalle, C., Fievez, C., Pipart, A., & Debray, B. (2006). ARAMIS project: A comprehensive methodology for the identification of reference accident scenarios in process industries. Journal of Hazardous Materials, 130(3 Spec. iss.), 200–219. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jhazmat.2005.07.005
- El Hajj, C., Piatyszek, E., Tardy, A., & Laforest, V. (2015). Development of generic bow-tie diagrams of accidental scenarios triggered by flooding of industrial facilities (Natech). Journal of Loss Prevention in the Process Industries, 36, 72–83. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jlp.2015.05.003
- Elger, K., Opel, T., Topp-Jørgensen, E., Hansen, J., Tairova, Z., & Rash, M. (2015). Interact - Station Catalogue 2015. Aarhus University.
- Flick, U. (2009). An introduction to qualitative research ( 4th ed.). London, UK: Sage Publications Ltd.
- Government of Canada. (2016). Arctic operations manual. Retrieved from https://www.nrcan.gc.ca/sites/www.nrcan.gc.ca/files/earthsciences/files/pdf/polar/pcsp_manual_eng.pdf
- Haavik, T. K., Antonsen, S., Rosness, R., & Hale, A. (2019). HRO and RE: A pragmatic perspective. Safety Science, 117, 479–489. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ssci.2016.08.010
- Havinga, J., Dekker, S., & Rae, A. (2018). Everyday work investigations for safety. Theoretical Issues in Ergonomics Science, 19(2), 213–228. https://doi.org/10.1080/1463922X.2017.1356394
- Health and Safety Executive. (2014). Risk assessment: A brief guide to controlling risks in the workplace. Health and Safety Executive. Retrieved from www.hse.gov.uk/pubns/indg163.htm
- Hiermaier, S., Sharte, B., & Fischer, K. (2019). Resilience engineering: Chances and challenges for a comprehensive concept. In M. Ruth & S. Goessling-Reisemann (Eds.), Handbook on resilience of socio-technical systems (pp. 155–166). UK: Edward Elgar Publishing, Cheltenham. https://doi.org/10.4337/9781786439376.00015
10.4337/9781786439376.00015 Google Scholar
- Hollnagel, E., & Fujita, Y. (2013). The Fukushima disaster-systemic failures as the lack of resilience. Nuclear Engineering and Technology, 45(1), 13–20. https://doi.org/10.5516/NET.03.2011.078
- Hollnagel, E., Wears, R. L., & Braithwaite, J. (2015). From Safety-I to Safety-II: A White Paper. Retrieved from https://www.england.nhs.uk/signuptosafety/wp-content/uploads/sites/16/2015/10/safety-1-safety-2-whte-papr.pdf
- Hopkins, A. (2014). Issues in safety science. Safety Science, 67, 6–14. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ssci.2013.01.007
- Icepeople. (2018). Aurora Explorer resumes normal service four days after Barentsburg dock crash; engine surge blamed for accident. Icepeople. Retrieved from http://icepeople.net/2018/07/18/aurora-explorer-resumes-normal-service-four-days-after-barentsburg-dock-crash-engine-surge-blamed-for-accident/
- IMO. (2017). Code for ships operating in Polar waters (POLAR CODE) (Vol. 1). Retrieved from http://www.imo.org/en/MediaCentre/HotTopics/polar/Pages/default.aspx
- ISO. (2009). ISO 31000 - Risk management: Principles and guidelines. Geneva, Switzerland.
- Jasinska, J. (2019). Tragedy strikes as scientists’ bodies found after going for walk in Norwegian mountains and being swept away by avalanche. The First News2. Retrieved from https://www.thefirstnews.com/article/tragedy-strikes-as-scientists-bodies-found-after-going-for-walk-in-norwegian-mountains-and-being-swept-away-by-avalanche-5977
- Katz, C. (2018). Polar Bears Appear Where They Never Were Before. 6–7.
- La Porte, T. R. (1996). High Reliability Organizations—Unlike, Demanding and at Risk. Journal of Contingencies & Crisis Management, 4(2), 60–71.
10.1111/j.1468-5973.1996.tb00078.x Google Scholar
- Lay, E., Branlat, M., & Woods, Z. (2015). A practitioner's experiences operationalizing Resilience Engineering. Reliability Engineering and System Safety, 141, 63–73. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ress.2015.03.015
- Le Coze, J. C. (2019). Vive la diversité! High Reliability Organisation (HRO) and Resilience Engineering (RE). Safety Science, 117, 469–478. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ssci.2016.04.006
- Li, W., Sun, Y., Cao, Q., He, M., & Cui, Y. (2019). A proactive process risk assessment approach based on job hazard analysis and resilient engineering. Journal of Loss Prevention in the Process Industries, 59(March), 54–62. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jlp.2019.02.007
- Linkov, I., Fox-Lent, C., Read, L., Allen, C. R., Arnott, J. C., Bellini, E., … Woods, D. (2018). Tiered approach to resilience assessment. Risk Analysis, 38(9), 1772–1780. https://doi.org/10.1111/risa.12991
- Markowski, A. S., & Kotynia, A. (2011). “Bow-tie” model in layer of protection analysis. Process Safety and Environmental Protection, 89(4), 205–213. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.psep.2011.04.005
- Mentes, A., & Turan, O. (2019). A new resilient risk management model for Offshore Wind Turbine maintenance. Safety Science, 119, 360–374. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ssci.2018.06.022
- Pariès, J., Macchi, L., Valot, C., & Deharvengt, S. (2019). Comparing HROs and RE in the light of safety management systems. Safety Science, 117, 501–511. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ssci.2018.02.026
- Paté-Cornell, E., & Cox, L. A. (2014). Improving risk management: From lame excuses to principled practice. Risk Analysis, 34(7), 1228–1239. https://doi.org/10.1111/risa.12241
- Perrow, C. (1984). Normal accidents—Living with high-risk technologies. New York, USA: Harper Collins Publishers.
- Renn, O., & Klinke, A. (2015). Complexity, uncertainty and ambiguity in inclusive risk governance. In T. J. Andersen (Ed.), The Routledge companion to strategic risk management (pp. 13–30). London, UK: Routledge.
- Righi, A. W., Huber, G. J., Gomes, J. O., & de Carvalho, P. V. R. (2016). Resilience in firefighting emergency response: Standardization and resilience in complex systems. IFAC-PapersOnLine, 49(32), 119–123. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ifacol.2016.12.200
10.1016/j.ifacol.2016.12.200 Google Scholar
- Schaffer, A., & Schneider, M. (2019). Towards a responsible resilience. In M. Ruth & S. Goessling-Reisemann (Eds.), Handbook on resilience of socio-technical systems (pp. 9–29). UK: Edward Elgar Publishing, Cheltenham. https://doi.org/10.4337/9781786439376.00007
10.4337/9781786439376.00007 Google Scholar
- SRA. (2019). Society for Risk Analysis Glossary. 9pp. Retrieved from https://www.sra.org/sites/default/files/pdf/SRAGlossary-FINAL.pdf
- Stoffle, R., & Minnis, J. (2008). Resilience at risk: Epistemological and social construction barriers to risk communication. Journal of Risk Research, 11(1–2), 55–68. https://doi.org/10.1080/13669870701521479
- Sysselmannen. (2020). Sysselmannen avlivet isbjørnen. Retrieved from https://www.sysselmannen.no/nyheter/2020/01/sysselmannen-avlivet-isbjornen/
- Topp-Jørgensen, E., Rasch, M., Vincent, W., & Barnard, C. (2014). Interact - Management planning for Arctic and Northern Alpine research stations – Examples of good practices. Aarhus: Aarhus University, DCE – Danish Centre for Enviroment and Energy.
- Voytenko, M. (2016). Passenger ship ORTELIUS. Fleetmom website. Retrieved from https://www.fleetmon.com/maritime-news/2016/13187/passenger-ship-ortelius-arctic-ocean/
- Weick, K. E., & Sutcliffe, K. M. (2001). Managing the unexpected: Assuring high reliability performance in an age of complexity. San Francisco: Jossey Bass.
- Weick, K. E., Sutcliffe, K., & Obstfeld, D. (1999). Organizing for high reliability: Processes of collective mindfulness. In R. S. Sutton & B. M. Staw (Eds.), Research in organizational behavior (Vol. 1, pp. 81–123). Stanford: JAI Press Inc.
- Woods, D. D. (2006). Resilience engineering: Concepts and precepts ( E. Hollnagel, Ed.). Hampshire, UK: CRC Press LLC.
- Woods, D. D. (2009). Escaping failures of foresight. Safety Science, 47(4), 498–501. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ssci.2008.07.030
- Woods, D. D. (2015). Four concepts for resilience and the implications for the future of resilience engineering. Reliability Engineering and System Safety, 141, 5–9. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ress.2015.03.018