Volume 85, Issue 2 p. 346-375
Original Article

Appetite for Destruction? China, Ecologically Unequal Exchange, and Forest Loss

John M. Shandra

Corresponding Author

John M. Shandra

Department of Sociology, State University of New York at Stony Brook

Direct correspondence to John M. Shandra, Department of Sociology, State University of New York at Stony Brook, Stony Brook, NY; e-mail: john.shandra@stonybrook.edu.

Search for more papers by this author
Michael Restivo

Michael Restivo

Department of Sociology, State University of New York at Geneseo

Search for more papers by this author
Jamie M. Sommer

Jamie M. Sommer

Department of Sociology, University of South Florida

Search for more papers by this author
First published: 08 July 2019
Citations: 14
Direct correspondence to John M. Shandra, Department of Sociology, State University of New York at Stony Brook, Stony Brook, NY; e-mail: john.shandra@stonybrook.edu.

Abstract

We test the hypothesis from the theory of ecologically unequal exchange that agricultural exports to China are related to increased forest loss in low- and middle-income nations exporting to it. We do so by analyzing data for 75 low- and middle-income nations using ordinary least squares regression. We find support for our hypothesis that flows of agricultural exports from low- and middle-income nations to China are related to increased forest loss in exporting nations. We also find that a country's total agricultural exports, proximity of forest to infrastructure, and protected areas tend to increase forest loss.

The full text of this article hosted at iucr.org is unavailable due to technical difficulties.