Volume 86, Issue 2 p. 177-203
Original Article

Patterns of Educational, Occupational, and Residential Aspirations of Rural Youth: The Role of Family, School, and Community*

Donghui Wang

Corresponding Author

Donghui Wang

Center for Population and Development Studies, School of Sociology and Population Studies, Renmin University of China

Search for more papers by this author
Annelise DeJong Hagedorn

Annelise DeJong Hagedorn

Department of Arts and Sciences, Blue Ridge Community College

Search for more papers by this author
Diane K. McLaughlin

Diane K. McLaughlin

Department of Agricultural Economics, Sociology and Education, The Pennsylvania State University

Search for more papers by this author
First published: 11 May 2020
Citations: 6
*
Funding for data collection for the study was provided by the Center for Rural Pennsylvania, a legislative agency of the Pennsylvania General Assembly, and USDA's National Research Initiative grant number 2007-35401-17736. Institutional research support facilities have been provided by the Population Research Institute, funded by NICHD Center Grant R24HD41025, and the Department of Agricultural Economics, Sociology, and Education at The Pennsylvania State University.

Abstract

Research on youth and adolescents increasingly suggests that youths' aspirations are complex, multidimensional constructs. This is especially the case for rural youth, who may face conflicting goals when considering their educational, occupational, and residential aspirations. However, few studies have explored rural youths' aspirations from a MultiDimensional perspective. Using data from the younger cohort of the Rural Youth Education study, this research applies latent class analysis to examine the heterogeneity of rural youths' educational, occupational, and residential aspirations. Five distinct subgroups of youth are identified (1) ambitious stayers (27 percent), (2) ambitious yet uncertain youth (28 percent), (3) typical achievers (13 percent), (4) unambitious movers (8 percent), and (5) typical stayers (24 percent). These five subgroups of youth differ in their aspirations, the certainty of those aspirations, and perceived relationships among aspirations. Subsequent multinomial analysis shows strong associations of family, school, and community characteristics with youths' aspirational profiles. Youth with better family economic resources and good parent–child relationships are more likely to fall into the “typical achiever” category, relative to the other four categories. Understanding the interrelationship of rural youth's aspirations can help policymakers and community members develop strategies to assist rural youth in achieving an array of future goals.

Conflict of Interest

The authors report no competing interests.

The full text of this article hosted at iucr.org is unavailable due to technical difficulties.